MIDDLE EAST - ISRAEL
This page has news excerpts and comments on a variety of topics, mostly pertaining to
the Middle East and Israel. You are welcome to e-mail your thoughts; those deemed of interest
to our visitors will be included here.
Click here to send E-mail
now Please include software or other words in the subject of the e-mail to
clearly show it is not spam. Thanks.
You can search this individual page by using
the FIND function. Enter "Control - F" (FIND), or click on Edit
(Ctrl-E), then click on Find (Alt-F). Enter the keyword for the
search. Then, click on Find Next (Alt-F or hit enter) to locate the word or name
you seek.
Or, you can: SEARCH ENTIRE WINSPORTS SOFTWARE WEB SITE
TOPICS
Israel creation and
history
Comprehensive history
The Jews took
nobody's land
Security Fence
Arafat, Hamas, and terrorism
Muslims and Jews
Ethiopian
immigration to Israel
Anti-Semitism in Europe
Nobel Prizes . . . comparing Muslim and
Jewish recipients
Rand Study for
Independent Palestinian State
Irena Sendler, Polish Holocaust Heroione
Charles Winters, 1948 Aircraft to Israel
Variety of Middle East web
sites
Israel
creation and history
The Arabs had what they are
demanding now, but still were not satisfied. Almost
immediately after Israel was created, armies from five Arab countries (with 80
million Arabs) invaded Israel, determined to drive the Israelis into the sea.
About 1/2 million Israelis, with very limited arms, battled for 15 months, lost
more than 1% of its people (6000), and finally forced a truce in 1949. The Arabs had
full control of Gaza, West Bank, Golan Heights, and East Jerusalem. The Arabs
refused to allow Jews access to their holiest site (Western Wall), when the
Arabs controlled it. ( Israel always has allowed all religions access to their
holy sites.) Israel was about 4 miles wide near Tel Aviv. Arab tanks could have cut
Israel in half in about 10 minutes. Unfortunately, the Arabs would not allow the
Israelis to live in peace. The Arabs repeatedly broke the truce, determined to
destroy Israel. Israel was able to defend itself and improve its defensible
borders. Whatever problems the Arabs now have, they themselves are responsible.
Perhaps Turkey's partitioning of Cypress is an example of the only possible
immediate solution for Israel. Maybe, after several generations without hate
being taught in the schools, the walls can come down and both peoples can live
in peace. (factsandlogic.org, more
info) Very complete web sites with many links: www.geocities.com/truthmustbesaid/Middle-East
http://www.mideasttruth.com/index.html
http://www.geocities.com/compassionplease/SyriaTheMonster
Egypt
(with additional troops from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Algeria), Syria, Jordan,
Iraq, and Lebanon attacked Israel in
1967. Syria said it will drench the land
with Israeli blood and throw them into the sea. Against all odds, Israel won the
war and took land needed as a buffer zone against further attacks. (OCR,
9/30/01, Commentary 3 letter) [Arabs now want pre-1967 borders, to regain land
they lost after attacking and trying to destroy Israel.] ..... The middle east
Arab cartel produce oil for $2 a barrel, and sell it for $30 a barrel. (OCR,
9/9/03, Local 9) ..... Oppression
of Christians in Muslim countries:
"In its October 18 [2003] edition, “La Civiltà Cattolica” published a
strikingly severe article on the condition of Christians in Muslim countries.
The central thesis of the article is that “in all of its history, Islam has
shown a warlike and conquering face”; that “for almost a thousand years,
Europe lived under its constant threat”; and that what remains of the
Christian population in Islamic countries is still subjected to “perpetual
discrimination,” with episodes of bloody persecution." http://213.92.16.98/ESW_articolo/0,2393,41931,00.html
..... Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar said, "resistance will continue until the
Islamic
flag is raised
not
only over the minarets of Jerusalem, but
over
the whole universe."

The truth about Israel and Palestine
Thursday,
February 3, 2011
“Do the Jews even have a right to be in the Middle East at all?
Wasn’t there a group of indigenous people called the Palestinians, living
there since the beginning of measured history? Didn’t Jews arrive after
World War Two and conquer land that did not belong to them?”
This is utterly and completely false! The Jews lived in that land since
the time of Moses and despite some upsets from the Syrians and Babylonians,
remained in the land for some two thousand years until the Romans displaced
them. Prince Titus destroyed the temple in 70 AD. Then in the second century,
Emperor Hadrian crushed a new Jewish rebellion. This time, many of the Jews
were banished and others were made slaves of the Romans. A small number of
Jews did stay in the land and remained there right up through the twentieth
century. However, the name of the land at this time was changed because
Hadrian wanted to destroy Jewish identity. He renamed the land
“Syria-Palestinian.” Palestine was a Latin version of the word Philistine,
an ancient enemy of the Jews who were now extinct as a people. Hadrian was
deliberately insulting the Jews. There has never been a country called
Palestine. This was a nickname for the Holy Land under the Romans. The people
who today call themselves Palestinians are Arabs and they referred to themselves
as Arabs for centuries until they were dubbed “Palestinians” as a
publicity ploy by the terrorist and founder of the PLO, Yassir Arafat, who
himself did not use the title “Palestinian” until after the year 1964.
“Even if this is true, well then, OK. These Arabs lived in the land
for centuries.”
In ancient times Arabs could be found in many places but they did not
occupy the Holy Land in any significant number until after the time of
Mohammad and the spread of Islam. Muslims conquered the land from the
Byzantine Church (remnants of the converted, Roman Empire) Through the years,
with Crusades and other wars, the land switched ownership back and forth
between the Catholic Church and the Muslims. Eventually it fell into the hands
of another Muslim empire, the Ottomans. After defeating the Ottomans in World
War One, the Middle East found itself under the domain of Great Britain.
Even though the Middle East became a prize of the British Empire,
England had neither the desire nor ability to run that region of the world
forever. For this reason, they began working to create a series of new states
in which the Arabs (who had helped them defeat the Ottoman Empire) could
administer their own affairs. Although the term “Arabia” was already a
general description for a large part of this area, many of the Middle East
countries we know of today did not officially become independent nations until
the British occupation and subsequent withdrawal from this turbulent region of
the world.
While working to create new, multiple states, Great Britain (with the
cooperation of the League of Nations, an early proto-type of the United
Nations) decided they would also offer an opportunity for Jews all over the
world to return to their homeland. This invitation was called the Balfour
Declaration. Needless to say, grateful Jews responded with terrific
enthusiasm. Indeed, many children of Abraham did migrate from Russia, Western
Europe, and other corners of the globe where they had lived for some two
thousand years in ghettos at the mercy of pogroms or harsh policies of
Ant-Semitic governments. A homeland of their own had been a hopeful vision to
the Jews for two millennia. The most familiar Jewish toast (common at Passover
celebrations) said “Next year in Jerusalem.” But few thought they were
reciting much more than a pipe dream. Now they could really, truly return to
Jerusalem! Just imagine how this must have felt! The Jews were going to
sojourn to a country of their own, and not just any country; the very land of
their ancestors, a land where a remnant of Jews had remained since ancient
times, living side by side with Muslims and Christians who also had interests
in Palestine and who viewed it as their Holy Land too.
"What exactly was offered to the Hebrew immigrants by the League of
Nations?"
Everything we would today call Israel, everything we would
today call Jordan and most of what we would today call “the
occupied territories.”
When the Jews arrived, many of them purchased land from Arab lords. In
time, a terrain that had been little more than a desolate, flee bitten
combination of swamp and desert, swiftly turned green with farmland and
transplanted trees. The economy also boomed, transforming this area in
such an amazing way, that the term metamorphoses barely does justice.
New jobs were created, resulting in an influx of Arabs from other regions who
now saw Palestine as a land of opportunity and employment made possible by
Jewish farmers and businessmen recently arrived from Europe.
"What was the proportion of Arab and Jew in Palestine prior to the
Balfour Declaration? "
More Arabs than Jews inhabited the land at this time (resulting from
previous Muslim expansion) but the truth is, there was really only a handful
of each people group, because again, the swamp like conditions limited the
kind of life one could realistically enjoy in the Holy Land. The famous
author, Mark Twain wrote as much after his own personal visit. He was
surprised how desolate the Holy Land looked, how little was going on there and
how few people inhabited the area.
All of this changed when the League of Nations invited Jews to resettle
their ancient home. Ironically, it was after Jewish business created
a surplus of jobs that Arabs flooded into the territory in mass, creating a
situation where the Arabs greatly outnumbered the Jews.
In paradoxical fashion, the British, after inviting the Jews to return,
sold over 75 percent of Palestine to the Arabs, creating a new country called,
Trans-Jordan. This is an extremely important and seldom taught fact.
Please catch this: 75 percent of what had been offered to the Jews
was sold behind their backs to the Arabs instead! Not only were the Arabs
offered a “separate Palestinian state,” long ago, but they have been
living in one since the early part of the Twentieth Century. It’s called Jordan,
a country three times the size of what remained for the Jews.
The Jews accepted this betrayal, only because they had no choice. After,
all a sliver of the promise was better than no land at all.
But the Arabs didn’t want the Jews to have even a sliver and fresh
controversy broke out over what to do with the remaining 25 percent.
To appease the Arabs, the United Nations voted to divvy up the remaining
25 percent between the Jews and the Arabs. The Jews accepted this partition.
The Arabs did not.
After the partition vote from the United Nations, Israel declared its
Independence on May 14, 1948. One day later, five Arab armies invaded Israel
from Egypt, Tran Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq.
Important Note: This war had nothing to do with allowing a two state
solution. Indeed, the Arabs waged war because they were rejecting a two state
solution. Their stated goal was the complete extermination of Israel!
From Abid Saud King of Saudi Arabia 1947:
“ There are fifty million Arabs. What does it matter if we
lose ten million people to kill all of the Jews. The price is worth
it.”
From Azam Pasha, Secretary General of the Arabs League 1947:
“This will be a war of extermination and momentous massacre, which
will be spoken of like the Mongolian Massacres.”
From Haj Amin El Hussein Mufti of Jerusalem 1947
“ I declare a holy war my Moslem brothers. Murder the Jews!
Murder them all!”
Jews pleaded with Palestinian Arabs to remain in their homes.
Although many of the Arabs did flee or join the invading armies, a
considerable portion of Arabs remained in Israel. This interesting fact
is seldom discussed. About 300,000 Arabs fled Israel and about 160,000
remained. Today Israel still contains a vital Arab population and these Arabs
have more rights in Israel than any other Arab in any Arab country! In fact,
shortly before Yassir Arafat’s death, when there was talk (once again) under
the Bush administration, of a “separate Palestinian state” the Arab
citizens in Israel were asked if they wanted to move, renouncing their Israeli
citizenship, and live in the Palestine sector. Guess what they decided!
Some of them probably fell on the floor laughing before saying to the Israeli
government, “Oh, I’m sorry. You were serious.”
In 1948, when Israel beat the odds and defeated five invading nations,
the problem of refugees came up. We always hear about the Arab refugees
from Israel. But they were not the only refugees. Hundreds of thousands
of Jews were kicked out of Arab lands too. All of the Jewish refugees were
welcomed into Israel where as Arabs who wanted to resettle in Arab countries
were (for the most part) denied admission. Jordan was an exception but
even in Jordan most of the refugees were confined to camps. They lived in that
condition all the way up to 1967, when Israel annexed Jordan’s West Bank.
Prior to 1967 there was no significant ongoing discussion amongst the
countries of the world regarding Jordan’s treatment of the “poor
Palestinians.”
On December 11, 1948, the United Nations drafted and ratified Resolution
194. This was a call for the Arab states and Israel to resolve the
refugee/resettlement issues but the condition was that all returning citizens
would agree to live in peace. Receiving no such guarantee from the Arabs,
Israel decided to postpone repatriation until her neighbors would recognize
her right to exist.
In 1967, 9 different nations (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Algeria,
Kuwait, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq), declared war on Israel and promised to
exterminate every Jew.
“Egypt is ready to plunge into a total war that will be the end of
Israel” (Radio Cairo, May 17, 1967).
Surprising the world with a preemptive strike, Israel defeated the Arabs
in just six days. At that time, their territory was expanded to the West Bank,
The Golan Heights, The Gaza Strip, the Sinai, and the remainder of Jerusalem
(half of which had been taken over by Jordan after the 1947 war.) This
territory is frequently referred to as a part of Israel’s “illegal
occupation.” I tend to hate that term and I argue against it for the
following reasons:
1) When we think of occupying countries, what usually comes to mind is
an aggressive empire seeking to conquer and expand, not a tiny little nation
that expanded its borders only as a means of survival, to prevent her
untrustworthy neighbors from attacking again.
2) Most of this land had been legally offered to Israel in the Balfour
Declaration anyway, before Great Britain sold it behind Israel’s back.
3) Historically, the land had been the home of the Jews for literally
thousands of years.
4) The United Nations has become so corrupt, I no longer accept their
standard as to what is legal or illegal.
This is not to say that Israel has not given back land or made peace
treaties. The Sinai has been returned and other territories have been slowly
transferred to the Palestinian authorites. But, when two nations make a peace
treaty, there is supposed to be give and take on both sides. Israel’s deal
(brokered by the U.S) always goes like this. “You give the Palestinians back
some land and here is what they will do: They’ll promise to stop
killing you.” That’s the deal. Then, shortly after the deal, the
promise is broken and missiles are fired into Israel from Gaza (where the
Palestinians were finally offered their own autonomous rule) or a suicide
bomber kills women and children on a bus.
Let me be as straight with my readers as I possibly can. Nothing
Israel does, no gesture, no concession, no discussion, will make a hill of
beans of difference. They can sign a peace treaty. They can jump on board for
a two state solution. It doesn’t matter. Hezbolah wants Israel dead.
Al-Qaeda wants Israel dead. Hamas wants Israel dead. But it isn’t limited to
the terrorist groups. Muslim Brotherhood wants Israel dead. Palestine
itself wants Israel dead. The surrounding Arab nations want Israel dead. The
Persian nation of Iran wants Israel dead.
My advice to Israel: Just do what you have to do. Do what you need to
do. Do what is right. The world will hate you no matter what action you take
and the Arabs will try to kill you no matter how much flowery talk you
participate in with our State Department. You may as well just do
what’s right.
Bibliography
1) Middle East Conflict by Mitchell G. Bard, Ph.D
2) Philistine, by Ramon Bennett.
NOTE: For a fuller, lengthier, documented look at the history of the
Jews and the Palestinians, just clink into the link below and read a 12 part
series by Bob Siegel:
The
Truth About Israel And Palestine
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/forbidden-table-talk/2011/feb/3/
rare-history-lesson-truth-about-israel-and-palesti/

The UN
Sham Pampers The Palestinian Sham
by Guy
Millière
November 1, 2011 at 5:00 am
http://www.hudson-ny.org/2550/un-palestinian-sham
In his speech to the UN General Assembly last
month, Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, spoke of the United
Nations as the «house of lies » and the «theater of the absurd.» One
could go farther and state the whole truth: The United Nations has become a
sham.
The new United Nations Human Rights Council is
composed overwhelmingly of countries in perpetual violation of human rights,
and should more accurately be called the Council against Human Rights and
for the Promotion of Global Anti-Semitism.
The General Assembly is a place where
dictators and tyrants have an automatic majority to pass absurd motions and
obscene texts, such as the one that defines Zionism as racism, adopted in
1975, and repealed only sixteen years later with the greatest difficulty,
thanks to U.S. Ambassador John Bolton. The US veto in the UN Security
Council is the sole obstacle to the enactment of equally racist decisions.
Originally intended to foster peace on earth
and to end totalitarian regimes, the UN has become a place where Western
democracies are hostages to brutal, barbaric regimes. No one has yet even
been fired for « the biggest heist in history », over $117 billion, the
Oil-for-Food scandal of 2004, in which the UN set up a program supposedly to
provide food for impoverished Iraqis under the regime of Saddam Hussein, but
instead accepted kickbacks from the Iraqi regime while the food never
reached the people. Supposed UN peacekeepers in Africa still continue to
distribute goods to underage children in exchange for sex.
The tribune from which Benjamin Netanyahu
spoke is the same from which other world leaders also spoke. The President
of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, uttered genocidal
recommendations to cheers. The Prime Minister of Turkey, Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, was acclaimed as he accused Israel of using « excessive force »
against a Turkish flotilla's attempt to break a perfectly legal naval
blockade.
But, as UN recognition of a Palestinian state,
or at least an upgrade from which to continue making Israel's existence as
unpleasant as possible, was the featured act this year, Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas addressed the General Assembly with lies -- about
everything from who was responsible for stalling negotiations for the past
two years (the Israelis had agreed to a requested construction freeze, after
which the Palestinians still refused to come to the table until few weeks
before the deadline, and then demanded another construction freeze) -- to
who had failed to fulfill its side of the Oslo accords (the Palestinians had
agreed to stop incitement, but, among other violations since day one, never
even tried). Abbas descended from the podium to sanctimonious applause.
Western representatives walked out when
Ahmadinejad spoke, but when it was Abbas's turn, they remained. Many even
applauded. Does this mean they endorse lies? It appears they do, and that is
a shame.
Who can fail to understand that when Abbas
describes the creation of Israel in 1948 as a « Nakba » [catastrophe] for
Palestinians, he deliberately obscures the war of extermination waged
against Israel the day of its birth by five Arab nations: Egypt, Jordan,
Syria, Lebanon and Iraq?
At the time, the Western countries remained passive observers of the war,
and Israel's survival seemed a form of miracle.
Who can fail to see that when Abbas speaks of
occupation of Palestinian lands for « sixty-three years, » he is saying
the whole of Israel is an « occupied land »?
Who can fail to feel addled hearing Abbas
describe the security fence as an « annexation Wall » against
Palestinians, when everyone knows - or should know - that it was precisely
incessant terrorist attacks committed by Palestinian Arabs that forced
Israel to erect the barrier?
Who can fail to know, hearing Abbas refer to
« return of all refugees » to Israel as a condition for peace, that
Palestinian leaders -- both of the Palestine Liberation Organization and
Hamas -- have made clear both in their charters and every day on their media
as well as every outlet available [see www.pmw.org],
that their aim is to drown Jewish Israel in a stream of millions of Muslim
Arabs?
Why would anyone accept Abbas's references to
« Palestinian territories » and « Palestinian people » ? The term «
Palestinian people » is of recent coinage. The
« Palestinian people » was a term invented in the mid-1960s, when
the Egyptians and Soviets decided to market the war against Israel as a war
of « national liberation .» What was to be "liberated," it
turned out, was all of Israel, "from the [Jordan] River to the
[Mediterranean] Sea, " as Faisal al-Husseini, the Palestinian Authority
Minister for Jerusalem Affairs, put it.
There has
never been a « Palestinian territory » belonging to a « Palestinian
people, » let alone a Palestinian nation.
Palestine was an area controlled for hundreds of years by the Ottoman Empire
until it was disbanded in the 1920s. The area was then governed as the
British Mandate of Palestine until Israel was declared a state in 1948, and
Arab armies immediately went to war to try to destroy it. Between 1920 and
1948, Jews had « Palestine » stamped on their passports as their country
of origin, and were « Palestinians » every bit as much as the Arabs were.
The people who now call themselves « Palestinians » are those Arabs who
left that land when the war
started: some fled not to be in the middle of the fighting; others were told
on bullhorns to leave to make it easier to kill the Jews so the Arabs could
sooner come back.
After Israel beat back the invaders, the Arabs
who had fled from Palestine wanted to return; the Israelis refused on the
grounds that, as they had not stayed to help, they had not been loyal and
could therefore considered fifth-columnists. The Arabs who did stay, the
Israeli Arabs -- in this allegedly « apartheid » state -- still make up
about 20% of the population, over a million and a half. They have their own
political parties; their own members elected to the Israeli parliament, the
Knesset; sit on the Supreme Court; hold senior positions in the Israeli
diplomatic corps; work as physicians in the top hospitals and as professors
at the leading universities, and even serve in the Israeli army only if they
wish.
If they are not as integrated into the society as they might wish to be, it
is because they have chosen so -- not because any opportunities have been
denied them. As the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan used, to say, «Everyone
is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own set of facts .»
When Abbas returned to Ramallah from his
September trip to the UN, the slogans chanted by the crowd were clear: « A
million martyrs marching to Jerusalem! » and, « We will liberate Palestine
in blood! »; but it seems no Western diplomat heard them and drew the
undisguised conclusion.
Most Western countries – the United States
apart – have rarely conducted themselves other than disgracefully
regarding Israel, right from the beginning. The United Nations is where much
of this conduct not only takes place, but is pantingly encouraged.
When the PLO carried out waves of terror
attacks that culminated in the Munich massacre of Israeli athletes in 1972,
the Western world could see it was dealing with terrorists and murderers.
When, however, two years later, Yasser Arafat was invited to the UN, and
gave a speech as distorted as that recently given by Mahmoud Abbas, no
Western UN representative seemed to recall that Arafat was, at that time,
chief of all the terrorists and murderers who not only killed athletes in
Munich, but also, among other acts, had an elderly, wheelchair-ridden man
thrown off a boat into the sea.
When the PLO was admitted to the UN as an
observer, no representative of any Western country refused to sit alongside
the representative of this terrorist organization. When, in Madrid in 1991,
the discussions that would lead to the Oslo Accords were initiated, Western
pressure was instrumental in pushing Israel toward a « peace process,»
opening the door to the legitimization of the Palestinian Authority and a
decade of suicide bombings that killed more than 1,400 Jews. Israeli leaders
have bowed to pressure; this does not excuse those who exerted the pressure.
Meanwhile, in speech after speech, the PLO
leaders have spread a falsified version of history describing Israel as an
artificial and colonial state. After 1921, however, and the fall of the
Ottoman Empire, virtually all the states in the region -- The Republic of
Turkey, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Transjordan, Saudi Arabia, and the
British Mandate of Palestine -- were born, a fact that seems to have been
forgotten. Jordan, formerly Transjordan, and now consisting 70% of
Palestinians, was created then, too, on 80% of the land of the British
Mandate that was supposed to become the Jewish national home -- another fact
that seems to have been forgotten.
At that time, what is now called the West Bank
was annexed by Jordan, and Gaza by Egypt.
If the PLO had ever spoken about a plan to "liberate" these
territories, or had called them « occupied Palestinian territories, » it
would immediately have been crushed by the Arab armies.
For many years, the PLO, founded in 1964, was
nothing more than an instrument in the Arabo-Soviet aggression against
Israel. When the Soviet Union fell in 1991, the Western world became the
PLO's major financier; while the PLO could then have disappeared, the West
did everything to save it.
It was at this point that the West gave the
PLO massive financial aid that makes the «
Palestinians » the world's most subsidized « people .»
The Palestine Liberation Organization agreed
in 1993 to Israel's right to live in peace, and accepted the UN Security
Council Resolutions 242 and 338, rejecting "violence and
terrorism." Since that moment, however, the PLO has never ceased
embodying terror, hatred, and a rabid desire to destroy Israel. It pretends
to be less radical than Hamas, but, as its own charter, which was never
rescinded, and Mahmoud Abbas's UN speech guilelessly attest, cherishes the
same goal: to exterminate Israel as a Jewish state..
Israeli leaders are constantly badgered to
reach out to adversaries who will never sign a peace agreement, not only
because they are at war, but because they are committed to wage the war
until, they hope, Israel is wiped off the map, just as it is in all of their
maps [www.pmw.org].
The United Nations, meanwhile, not only has
never even attempted to enforce its own resolutions, but has been
enthusiastically working with the PLO to subvert them. If the UN, or the
Quartet, or anyone now accepts the unilateral creation of a "judenrein"
[cleansed of Jews: in other words, really apartheid] ], anti-Semitic,
Palestinian state that still calls for annihilation of Israel, it would be a
pitiful surrender, as well as a negation of all the values that both the UN
and the West claim to embody.
Although the American position makes creating
a Palestinian state impossible at this time, no doubt the pressure on Israel
will continue on, as always.
Which leaders in the West, seized by an onset
of moral dignity, will have the courage to affirm that just as the UN has
become a sham, the « Palestinian cause » is itself just a sham? The
problem could be solved overnight if the Arabs cared as much about their
people as the Jews do about theirs. In 1948, 800 000 Jews were expelled from
Arab lands and arrived in Israel, while at the same time around 700 000
Arabs left Israel for Arab lands. The Jews took in every one of their
people; the Arabs, instead, preferred to consign their « brothers » to
squalid refugee camps, and let the West pick up the bill.
To maintain the current situation may seem to
be the lesser evil, but is not a solution. It might be an worthwhile idea to
ask Western countries to suspend funding the Palestinian Authority if it
continues to ask for a State, as the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US
Congress recently discussed.
Western countries might be asked to suspend
funding any branch of the UN that promotes the unilateral creation of a
Palestinian State, as the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US Congress also
recently discussed.
Western countries might also be asked to set
strict conditions for continued funding, and to refuse to pay if
anti-Semitic propaganda and the glorification of terrorism continue to
appear in Palestinian media and classrooms, or there is no doubt that
anti-Semitic propaganda and glorification of terrorism will never disappear.
The territories conquered by Israel in the
defensive war of 1967 are not occupied territories; they are disputed
territories. Should Israel seriously be expected to hold them in perpetuity
for countries that repeatedly wage war on it until such a time as perhaps
its militant neighbors might feel like reclaiming them?
As a country constantly threatened and
regularly attacked by its neighbors, Israel's right to set its borders in
accordance with its security requirements and apply Israeli law within the
resulting area, should be recognized. The Palestinian Authority, especially
if it links up with Hamas, is a rogue entity and should be treated as such.
The status of the Arab population in Judea and
Samaria will have to be resolved from there. Pre-1967, these Arabs had the
same status as Palestinian Arabs in Jordan. They are fundamentally one and
the same population. Palestinian Arabs constitute the vast majority of
Jordan's population, The Arabs living in Judea and Samaria are the same
people as Palestinian Arabs living in Jordan -- where millions more
Palestinian Arabs live than in Judea and Samaria -- although they have been
dispossessed of their rights. They should recover them. Jordan is a
Palestinian state already. As Muhdar Zaran recently wrote, « It is not
certain that King Abdullah's regime will be able to survive a revolt from
the frustrated and angry Palestinian majority, should one take place.» He
added, « It might be time to start at least considering a Plan B for
Jordan.». I would add: It might be time to consider a Plan B for
Palestinian Arabs.
At present the Middle East is a zone of
turbulence and extreme Islamist agitation. Nobody in the area cares about
the « Palestinian cause » except as a pretext for whipping up hatred
toward Israel. What really should concern Western leaders today is Islamist
imperialism and the deeper meaning of the hatred of Israel.
Appeasement and cowardice will not decrease
Islamist agitation. No one ever won a confrontation by abandoning the
battlefield to the enemy.To abandon Israel would not be without far-reaching
consequences, resulting in yet another Islamist terrorist State based on
heavy Islamist supremacy, malicious lies and anti-Western racism.

The United
Nations Should Not Recognize an Apartheid, Judenrein, Islamic Palestine
by Alan
M. Dershowitz
September 21, 2011 at 11:30 am
http://www.hudson-ny.org/2442/united-nations-palestine
The draft constitution for the new state of
Palestine declares that "
Islam
is the official religion in Palestine."
It also states that Sharia
Law
will be "the major source of legislation." It is ironic that the
same Palestinian leadership which supports these concepts for Palestine
refuses to acknowledge that Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people.
Israel, in contrast to the proposed Palestinian state, does not have an
official state religion. Although it is a Jewish state, that description is
not a religious one but rather a national one. It accords equal rights to
Islam, Christianity and all other religions, as well as to atheists and
agnostics. Indeed, a very high proportion of Israelis describe themselves as
secular.
The new Palestinian state would
prohibit
any Jews
from being citizens, from owning land or from
even living in the Muslim state of Palestine.
The Ambassador of the PLO to the United States was asked during an interview
whether "any Jew who is inside the borders of Palestine will have to
leave?" His answer: "Absolutely!" After much criticism, the
Ambassador tried to spin his statement, saying that it applied only to Jews
"who are amid the occupation." Whatever that means, one thing is
clear: large numbers of Jews will not be welcome to remain in Islamic
Palestine as equal citizens. In contrast, Israel has more than 1 million Arab
citizens, most of whom are Muslims. They are equal under the law, except that
they need not serve in the Israeli army.
The new Palestine will have the very
"law of return" that it demands that Israel should give up. All
Palestinians, no matter where they live and regardless of whether they have
ever set foot in Palestine, will be welcome to the new state, while a Jew
whose family has lived in Hebron for thousands of years will be excluded.
To summarize, the new Palestinian state will
be a genuine apartheid state. It will practice religious and ethnic
discrimination, it will have one official religion and it will base its laws
on the precepts of one religion. Imagine what the status of gays will be under
Sharia law!
Palestinian leadership accuses Israel of
having roads that are limited only to Jews. This is entirely false: a small
number of roads on the West Bank are restricted to Israelis, but they are
equally open to Israeli Jews, Muslims and Christians alike. The entire state
of Palestine will have a "no Jews allowed" sign on it.
It is noteworthy that the very people who
complain most loudly about Israel's law of return and about its character as
the nation state of the Jewish people, are silent when it comes to the new
Palestinian state. Is it that these people expect more of Jews than they do of
Muslims? If so, is that not a form of racism?
What would the borders of a Palestinian state
look like if the Palestinians got their way without the need to negotiate with
Israel? The Palestinians would get, as a starting point, all of the land
previously occupied by Jordan prior to the 1967 War, in which Jordan attacked
Israel. This return to the status quo that led to the 6 Day War is
inconsistent with the intention of Security Council Resolution 242, which
contemplated some territorial changes.
The new boundaries of this
Palestinian
state would include Judaism's holiest place, the Western Wall.
It would also include the access
roads to Hebrew University,
which Jordan used to close down this great institution of learning founded by
the Jews nearly 100 years ago. The new Palestinian state would also
incorporate the
Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem,
in which Jews have lived for 3000 years, except for those periods of time
during which they were expelled by force.
It is contemplated, of course, that Israel
would regain these areas as part of a land swap with the Palestinians. But
there is no certainty that the Palestinians would agree to a reasonable land
swap. Palestinian leaders have already said that they would hold these
important and sacred sites hostage to unreasonable demands. For example, the
Western Wall covers only a few acres, but the Palestinian leadership has
indicated that these acres are among the most valuable in the world, and in
order for Israel to regain them, they would have to surrender thousands of
acres. The same might be true of the access road to Hebrew University and the
Jewish Quarter.
When Jordan controlled these areas, the
Jordanian government made them Judenrein—
Jews
could not pray at the Western Wall, visit the Jewish Quarter, or have access
to Hebrew University.
There is no reason to believe that a Palestinian state would treat Jews any
differently if they were to maintain control over these areas.

British Methodists Distort History
June 13, 2011 at 5:00 am, Hudson Institute
In 2010, the Methodist Church in Britain produced a report entitled
"Justice
for Palestine and Israel". The report was adopted as official
Methodist policy. Consequently, British Methodists are now called upon to
boycott certain Israeli products and support the pro-Palestinian initiatives
of the World Council of Churches and Christian Aid.
We have looked at this report, which relies heavily upon a purported
history of Palestine in the twentieth century, supported by a bibliography
that makes no pretense to impartiality. Anyone who has any genuine
acquaintance of that history will be amazed at the continual
misrepresentations. In particular, the report repeatedly uses statistics that
will mislead an unknowing reader. The report is not the first example of this
genre of semi-fact, but perhaps it is the greatest masterpiece to date.
Some time ago, we reviewed a miniature product of the genre in our exposé
of the Myth
of Palestinian Christianity. To do the same for the Methodist report would
require a substantial monograph, not a mere article. Moreover, the task would
be a waste of time, since such a report can hardly have come from people who
might be prepared to change their minds.
But if the British Methodists ever show interest in salvaging their
reputation, they should engage a respectable historian (say Benny Morris) to
review the report and list its falsities. Moreover, they should pay that
historian handsomely for the mental torture involved. Cheaper and more
befitting a Christian institution would be to throw it officially into the
waste-paper basket. If that sounds exaggerated, consider just a sample of the
report's statements.
Of the Arab revolt (1936-1939), the report says that it "was put
down with brutal ferocity by British
forces during which 5000 Palestinians were killed and 10,000
wounded". Not mentioned is that up to half of the fatalities were Arabs
killed by other Arabs on various pretexts. This includes the fighting between
the Husseini and Nashashibi clans, in which the Nashashibi leadership was
largely wiped out. Jewish casualties are not mentioned at all.
Similar omissions occur where the report mentions the first Palestinian
intifada. It is described in this sentence: "This Intifada, which lasted
from 1987 to 1991, was mainly associated with stone throwing and popular
unrest within the Occupied territories, together with a corresponding firm
response by Israeli forces."
Not mentioned is that as many
Arabs were killed by other Arabs as by Israelis, on various accusations
of being collaborators and prostitutes, etc. The PLO and Hamas also ordered
the resignation of the entire local Jordanian-created police, which Israel had
left in place since 1967. As a result, crime multiplied without control and
various Palestinian organizations could rob the population in the name of
resistance. Those organizations also ordered endless strikes that deprived the
middle classes of income. A lot more happened than mere stone throwing.
The 1947 resolution of the United Nations General Assembly is described
as a plan "to partition the territory, with 56% going to the third of the
population who were Jewish." Sounds very unfair, if you do not know that 82%
of the Jewish part was the Negev desert. Its then
population, apart from Beersheba (6,490) and 510 in Jewish villages,
consisted of uncounted Bedouin nomads. It was allocated to the Jews on the
assumption that they alone might make it less of a desert, as indeed happened.
The UN plan, continues the report, "ignited a civil war" in
which "750,000 Palestinians" were "forced from their
country." Here the report is guilty of the most elementary of mistakes,
or rather deceptions: equating the total number of refugees with the number
that left the area of the British Mandate. In fact, it is estimated
that about a third went to the West Bank, a third went to the Gaza Strip and only
a third actually went away "from their country" to Lebanon,
Syria or Transjordan. Two-thirds, that is, of the Arab refugees were displaced
not from Mandatory Palestine but merely within it. The Jordanians and
Egyptians put them in refugee camps; the Palestinian Authority and Hamas, too,
keep them in those same camps.
Thus, adds the report, "Israel secured its independence on 78% of
the territory, having expelled around 80% of the Arab population." Only
it omits to note that 100% of the
Jewish population was expelled from the areas that came under Jordanian
and Egyptian rule. As for the 78%, three-fifths of it (4,700 out of 8,019 sq
miles) was the Negev desert. Once again, the percentages mentioned by the
report serve to deceive rather than to inform.
The description of the origins of the Six Day War is even more laconic:
"tensions culminated in the Six Day War in which Israel fought against
Egypt, Jordan and Syria." In fact, the first
belligerent act was committed by Egypt, when Nasser ordered a blockade
of the Israeli port of Eilat and told the UN buffer force to leave the border
between Egypt and Israel. It was also Jordan that initiated hostilities
against Israel, not the reverse. So it was Egypt and Jordan who made war on
Israel, who lost, and who thereby gave Israel control of the West Bank and
Gaza. The Arab League, meeting in Khartoum on September 1, 1967, thereupon
adopted its "Three 'No's": "no peace with Israel, no
recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel."
Thus the "Occupied
Territories" were born in a war of Arab aggression, after which the Arabs
refused to make peace because they refused to accept Israel in any form.
That was the permanent reality in which Israel was left to decide alone what
areas were necessary for its long-term security and began to settle them. Not
that the Methodists would tell you.
Of the origins of the PLO, the report merely declares: "In 1964,
the Palestinians finally achieved an independent political voice, through the
establishment of the Palestine Liberation Organization." No mention of
the fact that the PLO adopted a charter calling for the destruction of the
State of Israel by armed force, etc. This was before the Six Day War, when all
that prevented the creation of a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza
was Arab opposition.
The opposition included the PLO itself, since the PLO
charter of 1964 stated: "Article 24: This Organization does not
exercise any territorial sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite
Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip or in the Himmah Area..."
Israel alone must be the target. Only after the war, in 1968, did the PLO
revised the charter to eliminate that restriction. Indeed, the Methodist
report contains no explanation whatsoever of the Fatah and Hamas ideologies,
nor of the constant incitement against Israel today in the Palestinian
media and educational system.
And so on and so on. Now, we are familiar with this sort of repetitive
deception from banal Palestinian propaganda. But what is left of the
reputation of a church that adopts such a strategy?
So let us go on to a further example of the elementary statistical
blunders: "There are currently around 125,000 Palestinian Christians in
Israel/Palestine." Here they may be quoting a figure recently given by
Israel's Central
Bureau of Statistics of 122,000 Arab Christians in Israel, including
Jerusalem. But they forget that there are another 40,000 or so Arab Christians
in the West Bank and a few in Gaza. Add to that some tens of thousands, at
least, of non-Arab Christians in Israel.
This invalidates the report's central claim that there are
"declining numbers" of Christians in "Israel/Palestine."
In fact, their numbers have slowly but steadily increased since 1948. It is
simply their percentage in the total population that has decreased; for the
details see my Myth
of Palestinian Christianity. Thus the Methodist report not merely repeats
the frequent confusion between absolute numbers and percentages, it sloppily
fails to get the absolute number correct in the first place.
Note that the great majority of the Arab Christians live in Israel. From
there, during 1948-1967, the Jordanians rarely let them visit the holy places
in Jerusalem. After 1967, they could go there whenever they wanted to. But
what did the Six Day War mean for Christians, according to the Methodist
report? "To Christians, the loss of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was
of great significance."
Think, Methodists, what you mean by that. Christians have
"lost" the Holy Sepulchre, which is visited by thousands upon
thousands of Christians every day? Well, the Holy
Sepulchre is technically owned by the Muslim Waqf, while the local
churches have to request the key from two
Muslim families in order to open the door – and pay
for the privilege. But in that sense the Holy Sepulchre was
"lost" centuries ago. Some Christians might call it a demeaning and
intolerable situation, but not our Methodists.
As for the Muslims themselves, the report complains that "Muslims
lost de facto control of their third holiest Mosque – the Al Aqsa Mosque –
as well as the Dome of the Rock or Haram-al Sharif." Here the Methodists
show that, without any examination of the facts, they are merely capable of
making baseless pronouncements of politico-theological dogma.
After the Six Day War, the Muslim
Waqf was immediately permitted by Israel to retain its control of the Temple
Mount, while Jews were forbidden to pray there. The problem is the very
opposite: the State of Israel has been far too hesitant to exercise any
authority there, despite grossly irresponsible activities of the Waqf. The
Israeli police is satisfied if it can prevent rioting on the Temple Mount and
the hurling of rocks from there on Jews down below at the Western Wall. And
that is all.
In particular, the Waqf has
carried out unauthorized and unsupervised excavations in order to add
a third mosque underground. This cultural
vandalism also dangerously weakened the support walls of the Temple Mount.
The excavated material was dumped outside in the Kidron valley, where the
Israeli archaeologist Gabriel
Barkay belatedly rescued 400 lorry loads of it. He is supervising a
multi-year project to sift through it all. Extremely valuable
artefacts going back to the First Temple period have emerged.
The Waqf cares nothing for this, since it claims that any
talk of a Jewish temple there is a Zionist fabrication; this is a
purely Muslim site. Such claims belie the New Testament along with the Old
Testament, since Jesus and the apostles are often described as visiting the
Temple. But the Methodists ignore those Muslim claims that their Bible is
replete with lies.
The report has a section bemoaning "The Plight of Palestinian
Israelis." Among its complaints is that "despite being 20% of the
population, only 3.5% of Israeli land is in Arab-Palestinian ownership."
What it does not mention is that only about 7% of Israeli land altogether is
in private
ownership. This is yet another item of statistical trickery that features
widely in Palestinian propaganda, but disgraces a church that employs it.
The issue is rather who can live on state land. A landmark
decision of Israel's Supreme Court in 2000 cemented the principle that
state land must be available to all citizens. The petitioners, the Kadaan
family, moved into their newly-built house in Katzir in December 2010. This is
an issue on which the last word has not been said, yet it has involved
hypocrisy that was not limited to Jewish right-wingers.
Nothing would rouse greater fury in the Israeli Arab sector than a
concerted attempt by Jews to buy up houses in Arab villages. Last year, a Jew
who bought a house in the Arab village of Ibillin was forced to leave
within days after neighbours openly threatened to kill him. Here, by the way,
is where the much celebrated Elias Chacour made his name. His intervention
would have been appreciated.
There is just one village in Galilee, Peki'in,
where for centuries Jews lived
alongside Druze and Christian Arabs. In recent years, however, Arab
gangs harassed the Jewish families and all the last Jews were driven out in
2007 except for one lady who looks after the synagogue. Basically, it is impossible
for Jews to live in an Arab village in Israel.
In its call for boycotts of Israel, the report relies heavily upon the
so-called Kairos Palestine Document, which it recommends to all Methodists as
coming from "church leaders in Palestine." But apart from Bishop
Munib Younan, who subsequently withdrew his signature, the listed authors of
the document are a group of minor figures, dissidents and retirees. Note also
that one of the authors, Rifat
Odeh Kassis, has made it clear that the document does not claim that the
Heads of the Churches in Jerusalem support boycotts.
We have exposed the real agenda of the document elsewhere.
It has also been severely criticised by a number of leading German
theologians, including Rolf Schieder (Neukirchener Theologische Zeitschrift
25/2, 2010, pp. 191-194), Michael Volkmann (also
in English) and Klaus Wengst (lecture
in Bonn on May 13, 2011). Methodist theology must be at a low ebb in the
UK if this sort of material is its staple.
We shall omit the further litany of complaints against Israel (with a
couple of token mentions of Palestinian terrorism). They use the familiar
propaganda trick of describing incidents without any mention of context. Nor
shall we review the long list of variously absurd demands made of Israel, nor
the calls upon Methodists to act to enforce those demands. Thus the Methodists
uphold "the rights of the refugees," that is, the "right"
of the Palestinians to create an Arab majority in the State of Israel. As we
said, the Methodists should pay someone to clean up the mess.
http://www.hudson-ny.org/2190/british-methodists-palestine-germany

Hamas
spiritual leader Sheik Ahmed Yassen issued a religious edict permitting women to
carry out suicide bombings. (OCR, 1/16/04, News 16) ..... Spain
sentenced Iman Mohamed Kamal Mostafa to 15 months in prison because he told
Muslim men how to beat their wives, in his book "Women in
Islam." (OCR, 1/15/04, News 26) ..... Mahmoud Youssef Kourani, 32, a
Lebanese man living in Dearborn, MI, has been accused of fighting. recruiting,
and raising money for Hezbollah. He entered
the U.S. illegally through Mexico in 2001, resided in the Detroit area,
and hid his Muslim identity. His
brother is security chief for Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. (OCR, 1/16/04, News
14)
After ethnic cleansing of Jerusalem and West
Bank between 1948 and 1967, Arabs now claim the land as theirs. fanciful
Arab myths to sway world opinion. ..... A few
hundred years BC, the Egyptians, who had enslaved the Jews, allowed them to
leave Egypt after a series of plagues. The Jews fled through the Sinai, the
Exodus. "After 40 years in the wilderness, they emerged to settle in
Canaan, the ancient territory that is now Israel, the occupied
territories, and Lebanon." (USN&WR, 10/20/03, 47) [The Jews had
settled in the so-called occupied territories more than 2000 years ago.] ..... Arafat's
Mufti: No such thing as a 'Wailing Wall':
On the same day that Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser
Arafat was quoted as saying that he recognizes Jewish sovereignty over the
Western Wall, his mufti, Ikremah Sabri, said on Friday that there is no such
thing as a "Wailing Wall." The
mufti, who was appointed by Arafat, told thousands of worshippers attending
Friday prayers at the Al-Aqsa mosque that the Western Wall is part of the Al-Aqsa
mosque and that it belongs to the Muslim Wakf (trust). "Seventy years ago
the Committee of the League of Nations recognized the Al-Buraq Wall (Western
Wall) as being part of the walls of the Al-Aqsa mosque," Sabri said.
(Jerusalem Post Online Edition, 12/13/03) ..... With the exception
of Egypt, all the countries of the Middle East are artificial creations. After
World War I, England and France carved up the Ottoman Empire, with England
retaining what are now Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Israel and Iraq, and France being
in possession of what are now Syria and Lebanon. In 1917, the Balfour
Declaration, proclaimed by the British mandatory power, established all of
Palestine, east and west of the Jordan River, as the reconstituted homeland for
the Jewish people. This was ratified by the 52 countries of the League of
Nations. Insistence that these are Arab lands and that the Jews are
“occupiers” is a myth. http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_88.html
..... In the “peace” accord with Egypt, Israel foolishly yielded the vast
Sinai peninsula to Egypt, together with two thriving cities [partially developed
by Israel]; producing oil fields (developed by Israel, of course), that would
have made Israel independent of oil imports and would have represented huge
savings; the strategic port of Sharm-el-Sheik; two militarily indispensable
mountain passes, and more. http://www.factsandlogic.org/0704_mailing_gen.html
In 1948, when the army of the
Kingdom of Transjordan, together with five other Arab armies, invaded the Jewish
state of Israel, on the very day of its creation. The ragtag Jewish forces
defeated the combined Arab might, but Transjordan stayed in possession of the
territories of Judea and Samaria and the eastern part of the city of Jerusalem.
The Jordanians promptly expelled all the Jews from the area that they occupied,
destroyed all Jewish institutions and houses of worship, used Jewish cemetery
headstones to build military latrines, and renamed as "West
Bank" the territories that had been Judea and Samaria since time
immemorial. In the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel regained possession of
Judea/Samaria (now renamed "West Bank"), which the Jordanians had
illegally occupied for 19 years; of the Gaza strip, which had been occupied by
the Egyptians but which (hundreds of miles from Egypt proper) had never been
part of their country; and of the Golan Heights, a plateau the size of Queens
(NY), which, though originally part of Palestine, had been assigned to Syria by
British-French agreement. The last sovereign in Judea/Samaria and in Gaza was
the British mandatory power - and before it was the Ottoman Empire. All of
Palestine, including what are now the Kingdom of Jordan and Gaza, was, by the
Balfour Declaration, destined to be the Jewish National Home. How then could the
Israelis possibly be "occupiers" in their own territory? The concept
of "occupied territories"
in reference to Judea/Samaria and Gaza is a myth created by Arab propaganda. The
concept of "Palestinians" is one that did not exist until about 1948,
when the Arab inhabitants, of what until then was Palestine, wished to
differentiate themselves from the Jews. Until then, the Jews
were the Palestinians. There was the Palestinian Brigade of Jewish
volunteers in the British World War II Army (at a time when the Palestinian
Arabs were in Berlin hatching plans with Adolf Hitler for world conquest and how
to kill all the Jews); there was the Palestinian Symphony Orchestra (all Jews,
of course); there was The Palestine Post (now The Jerusalem Post); and so much
more. The Arabs who now call themselves "Palestinians" do so in order
to persuade a misinformed world that they are a distinct nationality and that
"Palestine" is their ancestral homeland. factsandlogic.org
Jerusalem: Never an Arab capital. But the city of Jerusalem — in contrast to Baghdad, Cairo, and Damascus — has never played any major role in the political and religious lives of the Moslem Arabs. It was never a political center, never a national or even a provincial or sub-provincial capital of any country since biblical times. It was the site of one Moslem holy place, but otherwise a backwater to the Arabs. The passion for Jerusalem was not discovered by the Moslem Arabs until most recent history. Jerusalem has stood at the center of the Jewish people’s national life since King David made it the capital of his kingdom in 1003 BCE. It remained the capital until the kingdom was conquered by the Babylonians 400 years later. After the return from Babylonian exile, Jerusalem again served as the capital of the Jewish people for the next five and a half centuries.
Jews are not the usurpers in Jerusalem. They have been living there since the Biblical era and have been the majority population since the 19th century. Jews have synagogues and other holy sites in most cities of the world. But do they claim sovereignty over those cities because of it? Of course not! It would be preposterous and people wouldn’t accept it. And the Moslem Arab claim to Jerusalem, based on the mosques on the Temple Mount, is just as untenable. Jerusalem has been the center of Jewish life, of Jewish yearning, and of Jewish thinking for over 3000 years. That is the reason that the State of Israel has rededicated the Jewish holy city to be its indivisible capital.
http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_07.html
In 1948, five Arab states invaded Israel, and urged the Arabs
to flee the war zone, so as not to impede the invading armies. Once victory was
achieved and after all the Jews had been killed or had fled, the Arabs could
return, reclaim their property and loot that of the Jews. About 600,000 Arabs
followed the call of their leaders and became refugees. About 200,000 accepted
the promises of the Israeli authorities that they would not be harmed and that
they would become citizens of the new state, with the same rights as the Jews.
Hardly any of the original 600,000 refugees are still alive. But five million
who claim to be their descendants clamor to “return” to Israel. With the
single exception of Jordan, none of their Arab brethren have allowed them to
settle in their countries and to become citizens. They have confined them to
squalid refugee camps, supported by UNWRA (a dependency of the U.N. and financed
mostly by the USA). Those refugee camps are seething hotbeds of hatred against
Israel and are the sources for terrorists and suicide bombers. Migrations of
populations are nothing new in world history, especially after major wars. About
15 million Germans were (often brutally) expelled from what became western
Poland, from what used to be East Prussia and from the Sudetenland. Millions of
Muslims and Hindus, following bloody battles, migrated to India and to what
became Pakistan. Other major migrations following the World Wars were those of
the French from Algeria, Armenians, Turks, Greeks, Cypriots, Kurds and others.
It is only the “Palestinians” who insist on being “repatriated.” But
more to the point, Israel has absorbed over 600,000 Jews who were expelled from
Arab countries and millions of others from all over the world. All of them are
productive citizens of their new country. The “right of return” is the one
concession that Israel can never grant and can never accept. Israel would be
swamped by Arabs, and Israel would cease to exist as a Jewish state. http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_80.html
There is no such
thing as a “Palestinian people. The so-called Palestinians are
the same Arabs that live in Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. Never at any time in
history did the “Palestinians” have a homeland, nor did they ever demand
one. In 1947, the United Nations General Assembly voted to set up both a Jewish
and an Arab state within the borders of the territories. The Arabs were allotted
three contiguous areas and the enclave of the city of Jaffa. The Jews were
allotted three discontiguous areas. Jerusalem was to be an international city.
In order to get their homeland, the Jews reluctantly accepted the unfavorable
deal. The Arabs rejected it out of hand and instead invaded the nascent Jewish
state with the armies of six nations. The ragtag Jewish forces decisively
defeated the aggressors and stayed in control of most of the area. Egypt
retained control of the Gaza Strip, and Jordan occupied Judea/Samaria (the
“West Bank”). Had the Arabs accepted the United Nations partition plan, they
would have had their “Palestinian homeland” for almost 60 years. They
spurned the opportunity when it was available to them. For nineteen years, until
the Six-Day War, the territories involved were under the control of Jordan and
Egypt. Never during those years was there ever a demand for a “Palestinian
homeland.” Only after the Six-Day War in 1967, when the territories reverted
to Israeli control, did the insistent clamor for a “Palestinian homeland”
arise. The declared goal of the Arabs, a goal never rescinded, is the
destruction of Israel. Were they granted an independent state, it would
geographically and strategically dominate all of Israel. Within a very short
time, this “Palestinian homeland” would be bristling with the most advanced
weaponry, in all likelihood including weapons of mass destruction. Arab armies
would be invited to participate in what they would hope to be the final
onslaught against Israel and against the hated Jews. The quest for an
independent homeland for the Palestinians is unwarranted because the
Palestinians are not a distinct people which never had or even claimed such a
homeland, and because the creation of such a homeland would be an existential
threat to Israel. The world and especially the Europeans don’t really care
about self-determination – they don’t lose any sleep over the Basques, the
Kurds, the Tibetans or others who yearn for a homeland. They care about their
own political and economic interests, which they cloak in the language of
political morality. And of course, there are quite a few who wouldn’t shed a
tear if, at the end of the day, Israel were indeed wiped from the face of the
earth. http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_91.html
Arabs have been
slaughtering Jews long before the “occupation,” long before the
creation of the State of Israel in 1948. In 1929, for instance, Arabs killed 133
Jews and wounded 399 in Hebron. Those who were not killed fled, making the city,
where Jews had lived for centuries, judenrein. The Mufti of Jerusalem met in
1941 with Adolf Hitler and declared his kinship with Nazi Germany because “we
have the same enemy as Germany, namely the Jews.” Palestine, which
incorporated what is now the Kingdom of Jordan, had been part of the Ottoman
(Turkish) Empire for centuries. After World War I, Britain was given the Mandate
over Palestine, which, in accordance with the Balfour Declaration, was to be the
homeland for the Jewish people. This was formalized by the League of Nations and
by the 52 nations that comprised it. In 1922, in violation of its Mandate, the
British severed all the lands east of the Jordan River – 80 per cent of the
Mandate – and gave it to the Arabs who, under the Hashemite rulers, created
the Kingdom of Jordan. The Jews acquiesced to this betrayal. Britain finally
relinquished its Mandate in 1947 and turned its responsibility over to the
United Nations. They came up with a partition plan, by which the Arab sector was
to be a contiguous land mass and the Jewish sector three discontiguous pieces.
Jerusalem, located in the very center of the Arab sector, was to be
“internationalized.” Most of the Jewish sector was the desolate Negev
desert. The Jews accepted this plan. But the Arabs rejected it out of hand and
invaded the nascent Jewish state with the armies of six nations. It cost
thousands of lives and caused over 650,000 Arabs to flee. Had
the Arabs compromised, they would now have had their state since 1948. In
the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel again defeated the combined Arab might and
remained in possession and administration of the Golan Heights, of Gaza, of
Judea/Samaria (the “West Bank”), of the Gaza Strip and of the entire city of
Jerusalem. Israel had no intention of staying in possession of these
territories. It waited for the Arabs to make proposals for peace, but that was
not forthcoming. On the contrary, the Arab League met at Khartoum and
promulgated their “three no’s”: no peace with Israel, no negotiation with
Israel, and no recognition of Israel. On Yom Kippur of 1973, Egypt and Syria
once again attacked Israel. And again, the heroic people of Israel defeated the
combined Arab armies and drove across the Suez Canal and to within miles of
Cairo. In the aftermath of that war, Egypt’s president Anwar Sadat came to
Jerusalem and spoke to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament. He offered a peace
treaty, but imposed very tough conditions, among others, the return of the
entire Sinai, with the cities that Israel had built; the return of the oil
fields that Israel had developed (and which would have made it
energy-independent for the foreseeable future); and relinquishing the strategic
mountain passes and early warning systems that protected Israel against any
future attack. It was the first time in recorded history that the vanquished
imposed conditions on the victor. In what was obviously a major act of folly,
and once again in its incessant quest for peace, Israel agreed to recognize the
murderous PLO, invited it back into Palestine from its exile in Tunis and signed
the Oslo Accord, by which governmental authority was to be bestowed on the
Palestinians. But instead of accepting the outstretched hand of peace, the
Palestinians launched their “intifadas,” which have cost thousands of lives
and which have left the Palestinians impoverished and with their economy in
shambles. The above is a mere outline of the “peace process.” In 2000,
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak made unprecedented concessions for the sake of
peace: 98 per cent of the land that the Palestinians requested, control over
most areas of eastern Jerusalem, and authority over the Temple Mount. To the
dismay of Clinton, Arafat curtly
rejected this dramatic offer. http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_93.html
http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/100/maps/index.html
has maps showing the changes in
the Middle East from the start of WWI to the present time. Of particular
interest is the UN 1947 partition, which gave the Arabs more than they are
demanding now, all the West Bank with all of Jerusalem internationalized, enlarged Gaza, plus
northern areas near Lebanon. Most (75%) of the Jewish land was desert, and the Jewish land
was divided into three parts, easily severed from each other. The Arabs rejected
the partition and existence of Israel, attacked with five armies, trying to take all the area and drive
the Jews into the sea. Compare the Partition map to the 1949 Armistice map.
The Arabs refused to accept Israel and live in peace. They attacked, and despite
overwhelming superiority, the Arabs lost land. Now they blame the Jews, and
seemingly have convinced the world that the Jews are the
aggressors. More Middle
East maps: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~gov46/
http://www.mideastweb.org/Mewcom.htm
(slow loading) http://directory.google.com/Top/Regional/Middle_East/Maps_and_Views/
The
1947 partition awarded 5 times the land
to the Arabs as to the Jews. [80 million Arabs attacked 1/2 million Jews.]
The Arabs lost the West Bank and Gaza in their 1967 war against Israel, but
refused a land-for-peace deal offered by Israel. In 2000, the Arabs refused
95% of what they said they wanted, and started the second violent
intifada. (OCR, 1/31/06, Local 9)
| 1947-48
Partition
|
1949
Armistice
|
1967 Six-Day War
|
In November 1947 the United Nations ordered the partition of
Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state, and the end of the British
Mandate by May 15, 1948. The above left map shows the Jewish state divided into
three hard-to-defend separate areas. Access to internationalized Jerusalem was
through Arab territory. The Arab powers of the Middle East rejected the
partition plan, and hours after Zionist leader David Ben-Gurion declared Israel
a state on May 14, the forces of Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Transjordan and Lebanon
invaded the new country. In a series of armistices with Egypt, Jordan, Syria and
Lebanon in 1949, Israel established borders similar to those of Palestine during
the British Mandate. Jordan retained the West Bank of the Jordan River, Egypt
had the Gaza Strip, and Jerusalem was divided under Israeli and Jordanian rule.
The Jews were not allowed access to the Wailing Wall. The above center map shows
the borders now demanded by the Arabs. In late October 1956, instigated by
Britain and France during the crisis over Egypt's seizure of the Suez Canal,
Israel invaded the Sinai Peninsula to destroy military bases. Israel captured
Gaza and Sharm el Sheikh at the tip of the Sinai Peninsula that controls access
to the Gulf of Aqaba. It also occupied most of Sinai east of the canal.
According to plan, the British and French intervened in the conflict to enforce
a U.N. cease-fire. The crisis ended in December when the United Nations
stationed a peacekeeping force in Sinai. Israel withdrew in March 1957. As
Egypt, Syria and Jordan mobilized their forces in spring 1967 for an evident
impending attack, Israel launched a preemptive strike. Starting on June 5, the
Israeli air force destroyed Egypt's planes on the ground; then Israeli tank
columns and infantry overran the Golan Heights, the West Bank of the Jordan
River, including the Old City of Jerusalem, Gaza and the Sinai Peninsula. The
war was over by June 10, ended by a U.N.-arranged cease-fire, see above right
map. Egypt and Syria attacked Israel in October 1973 (during Yom Kippur, the
Jewish holy day). Israel suffered heavy casualties but managed to repulse the
attacks. It even pushed Egyptian forces back across the Suez Canal and occupied
its west bank before the belligerents agreed to another cease-fire arranged by
the United Nations. In a series of 1974 agreements Israel withdrew its forces
back across the canal into Sinai and came to cease-fire terms with Syria. In the
Camp David Accords of March 1979, Egypt and Israel finally ended the war between
them. Israel returned the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt, and Egypt recognized
Israel's right to exist. The above three maps and much of the text is from
cnn.com,
direct link below.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/mideast/
In 1956, President Eisenhower made commitments to get Israel to withdraw
from the Sinai. In 1967, President Johnson failed
to implement those commitments, and the Six-Day War followed. In
1970, President Nixon made promises to end the war of attrition between Israel
and Egypt. Egypt violated the agreement, and the United States failed to live up
to its commitments. The 1973 Yom Kippur War followed, which killed 2,800
Israelis. In 1996 and again in 1998, President Clinton promised to refrain from
pressuring Israel into making further concessions until the Palestinian
Authority altered its charter, which calls for the elimination of Israel. The
charter was not altered, but Israel was expected to honor its promises. In 2000,
Clinton committed $800 million in special assistance to induce Israel to
withdraw from southern Lebanon. Israel withdrew, and Hezbollah quickly filled
the geographic and military vacuum, increasing terrorist attacks. The promised
assistance never arrived. Now President Bush has made a new commitment to
Israel. The depth of the problem is revealed in a new study by the Center for
Monitoring the Impact of Peace, which has been examining what the next
generation of Egyptian children are
learning about Israel. In Egypt's regular and religious educational
system, the books celebrate jihad, or Islamic war, and exalt those who die in
the fight against "nonbelievers." The center says jihad is described
in military terms, not as a spiritual endeavor, as so many Muslim leaders claim.
"Jihad is encouraged and those who refrain from taking part in it are
denounced," says the report. http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/2004_04.php
Israel: A Vision of Oil in the Holy Land
John Brown formed Zion Oil in 2000 and bought rights from the Israeli government to explore a 100,000-acre plot in northern Israel. After raising $7 million, mostly from other evangelicals eager to support the Jewish state, he chose a spot near Kibbutz Maanit to begin the 4,500-yard drill based on his reading of the Old Testament. Brown, a born-again Christian, began with Gen. 49:22-26, where he believes a verse about God's giving Joseph "blessings of heaven above [and] blessings of the deep that couches beneath" refers to the presence of oil in an area of ancient Canaan named after the tribes of Joseph's two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim. (The verse also includes reference to a well or spring—evidence, in Brown's mind, of underground treasure. A similar blessing "for the precious things of heaven ... and for the deep that couches beneath" appears in Deut. 33:13-17.) Brown traced the geographic location of the two tribes on a Biblical map he superimposed on a map of modern Israel. A wide area around Maanit corresponded to his interpretation of the texts. It also linked with research by Stephen Pierce, a geologist who had studied the area. Now Brown's consulting geologist, Pierce says there's a Triassic reef deep below the surface of Maanit, a strong sign of oil. The site where they're drilling has been excavated before, but John's team is going much deeper than a previous crew. Some Israelis politely scoff at the project. Zvi Alexander, a veteran of the Israeli oil business, says Brown's chances of hitting pay dirt are slim. He says nearly 500 holes have been drilled in Israel in the past 50 years by geologists looking, unsuccessfully, for oil. "I don't know of any other area in the world this small that has been poked so many times," he says. Brown says God won't let him fail. If no oil is found at Maanit by the time he reaches bottom later this month, Brown has plans to drill at least three more holes. That will require more money, which he says evangelical Christians will gladly provide. "Finding oil will give Israel a huge strategic advantage" over its Arab enemies, he says. "It will change the political and economic structure of the region overnight."
(Newsweek, 6/13/05, 10)
Life After Gaza
The mutual anguish of Jewish families in Gaza and the Israeli military forcing their removal from their long-cherished homes was intensely moving to witness, even as it was an inspiring demonstration of democracy and the rule of law. Nearly 10,000 Israeli citizens from two dozen thriving towns and agricultural villages in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank now have to start their lives all over again.
heir prime minister, Ariel Sharon, shares the anguish and deserves the congratulations he has received for his bold but risky attempt to change the political dynamic of the region. But will it? The response of the Palestinians to a heroic act of statesmanship is contemptible. Not only have their leaders been demanding more, but they have endorsed the baldfaced lie of the extremist Hamas group that "the blood of our martyrs" drove the Israelis out of the Gaza settlements.
The implication is that more bloodshed will produce more Israeli
concessions. Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, also known as Abu Mazen, has said all the right things in English for a western audience, but what is he doing to counter the notion that terrorism pays? Not a thing. On the contrary. He asserted that the credit of the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank goes to the Palestinians who were killed, wounded, and are present during the struggle--the credit for the retreat, he said, goes to the martyrs.
This is not just false. It is an incitement to more violence and terrorism. Most Israelis expect that Gaza, after a period of diplomatic quiet, will once again be a base for terrorism aimed not to adjust borders but to drive Israel from its biblical lands into the sea. Indeed, the idea of a Palestinian state living in peace with Israel is not credible to anyone who experiences the demonic nature of the hatred or reviews the threats continuously promulgated by the Palestinian leaders in every forum--mosques, schools, radio, newspapers, television, the Internet--everywhere.
Friends like these. Since all this poison passes largely unnoticed in the West, it is necessary to spell out a few declarations of intent. Abbas himself, on the occasion of Israel's 57th birthday, proclaimed that the
creation of the Jewish state was the "greatest crime in human history." More recently, he said: "Today we are beginning the march of the fishermen towards freedom. Soon you will be able to fish along the whole coast of Palestine." What could he mean when the rest of the coast of Palestine is Israel?
Yes, yes, Abbas is busy selling the idea that his strategy is to bring Hamas into peaceful politics, but what kind of people does he think he's dealing with? Just look at some of the recent statements by Hamas leaders. Mahmoud Zahar: "We are part of a large global movement called the International Islamic Movement. . . . [Gaza is] proof that the armed struggle has borne fruit. Neither the liberation of Gaza nor the liberation of the West Bank will suffice [for] us. . . .
We don't recognize the State of Israel or its right to hold on to one inch of
Palestine. . . . After the victory in Gaza we will transfer the struggle first to the West Bank and later to Jerusalem." The armed struggle is the only strategy that Hamas possesses. Radio al-Aqsa: "[Our] battalions will make you tremble in Haifa, in Tel Aviv. They will strike you in Zefat and Acre. Wait for us in Jaffa, Haifa, Tel Aviv. . . . The knights of Gaza are coming. Our beloved sons of Palestine, we make no distinction between [Israeli-controlled] Palestine and [the West Bank and Gaza Strip] Palestine." Jihad leader Muhammad Hindi: "The resistance will continue until the expulsion of the occupation from all our lands, including the West Bank, Jerusalem, and all of Palestine." The war isn't over, in other words, until there is
no more Israel. The truth is Abbas is not so much trying to smash the terrorist organizations as he is trying to reconcile with them, including paying some that engage in acts of terrorism, like the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades in Jenin, mostly former members of Palestinan security forces, who continue to receive salaries from the Palestinian Authority. Jamal Abu Samhadana, the head of the Popular Resistance Committees in Gaza, announced that at least 500 members of his group have been recruited to the PA. He himself was offered a senior "intelligence" position by the PA. There are over 700 armed gangs like this in Gaza, all connected with Fatah, that have made murder, kidnapping, and extortion a part of everyday
life. Whatever emollient words may be uttered on the occasion of the Gaza withdrawal, the violence from the Palestinian side simply cannot be ignored. In the five months between the February cease-fire and July, Palestinians carried out 812 attacks on Israeli targets, and thousands more were disrupted by Israeli security efforts. No fewer than 47 percent of those attacks were claimed by Fatah, the ruling group in the Palestinian Authority, which is headed by Abbas--yet no one was arrested or
expelled. How long can Israel negotiate a peace with people who in fact are coconspirators in the efforts to destroy the Jewish state? Diplomacy fails if one side does not deliver on its word. Where is the pro-peace, pro-prosperity, and pro-freedom wing of the Palestinian people determined to dismantle the terrorist groups, as called for by President
Bush? Pressure. Far from being disarmed, the terrorist forces are being rearmed, and now they're trying to transfer their technical knowledge on how to build rockets to groups in the West Bank, in order to attack nearby Israeli
cities. So what does Israel get in return for giving Palestinians Gaza? An Islamic terrorist state? Even a liberal think tank like the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies has concluded that the disadvantages and the risks of disengagement outweigh the benefits and that it will lead to more terrorism. In a recent paper, the center's scholars concluded: "After the disengagement, terrorism's center of gravity will shift to the West Bank . . . while Gaza will serve as a rear echelon and support base for this activity" and will "offer safe harbor for wanted terrorists and senior commanders," thus providing a place for Hamas and other terrorist groups to build larger militias with a greater degree of immunity.
In these circumstances, Israelis will be wholly justified if they refuse to make any more concessions until the Palestinians change their behavior over an extended period of time. And they will deserve the strongest international support for that. Western sympathy and aid for the Palestinians should now be conditioned on the Palestinians' unequivocal answers to six questions:
1. Will there be a decline in incitement to hatred or a change in the rhetoric of Palestinian officials when speaking in Arabic to their
people? 2. Will the Palestinians continue to be directed toward the destruction of Israel, or will they seek to build up their own
nation-state? 3. Will there be a stable government with real control of the territory that will stop terrorism and disarm radical groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad, as well as the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a terrorist paramilitary group ruled by
Fatah? 4. Will Palestinians continue to claim Israeli withdrawal as a victory through terrorism, thereby justifying more
terrorism? 5. Will the billions of dollars of new aid disappear into the private bank accounts of their leadership groups, as it has for years, or instead be put into programs for the welfare of their
people? 6. Will they dismantle the refugee camps that, despite all the foreign aid, have been a permanent condition of Gaza life and resettle their people in decent
housing? Without the right answers to these questions, it will be impossible for Israel to make further concessions and withdrawals, especially when the message from the international community is always that they are never enough--no matter what the Palestinians do.Fortunately, President Bush has long insisted that meaningful negotiations with the Palestinians cannot be held as long as Palestinian terrorism persists and the terrorist organizations are not dismantled and disarmed. His instincts will be to hold to that, but the instincts of a second term in any administration are similar to those of the last Clinton administration--namely, to accomplish some great diplomatic coup in this part of the world before the president's final term ends. The Bush administration would be wise to look not just at the failures of the Clinton administration to hold the Palestinians accountable but also at the Carter administration's participation in the ouster of the shah of Iran in 1979 because of Iran's poor human-rights record. The ensuing revolution brought the ayatollahs to power--a strategic catastrophe for America, for the region, and for Israel, since now the world must contend with a nuclear-ambitious and terrorist-sponsoring regime. Similarly, the danger is that Gaza will become a worldwide terrorist training base, much as Afghanistan was for the Taliban and al Qaeda.The assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, David Welch, said last week that it is critical that the Palestinian Authority disarm Hamas and other terrorist organizations. "In the road map," Welch said, referring to the U.S.-backed plan for peace in the region, "there is a requirement to take steps toward the dismantlement of the terror organizations. Hamas is, for us, a terror organization. I would expect that the PA would do those things. . . . Security is the beginning, the middle, and the end."Until now, Abbas has shown neither the willpower nor the firepower to stop the extremist terrorist groups from resuming terrorism. The next few years will determine whether President Bush continues with his policy of moral, strategic, and diplomatic clarity or abandons it in the pursuit of an illusory solution, pressuring Israel for more concessions, before knowing whether Abu Mazen presides over a Palestinian state or a terrorist state.
(USN&WR, 9/5/05, 70)
Israel voluntarily removed roadblocks; so terrorists in a Fatah group, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, put stolen Israeli license plates on a car, sped by a crowd at a hitching post, and opened fire with automatic weapons. Three young Israelis, including a 15-year-old, were killed, and four others were wounded. Now the entire Palestinian population will have to bear the burden of tighter Israeli security. To protect its citizens, Israel has to ban all private Palestinian cars from the main roads, rebuild roadblocks and barriers throughout Judea and Samaria, and end the turnover of West Bank towns (especially Bethlehem) to the Palestinian Authority. The sickening story of Hasan al-Madhoun is worth a little attention, you'd think. At the Sharm al-Sheikh summit in February, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told Abbas about the former Palestinian security officer who organized a suicide bombing at Ashdod in March 2004. He even gave him his address. Abbas promised an arrest within 48 hours. More than 48 days later, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice repeated the request to Abbas, who again promised to arrest Madhoun. Madhoun was called into a police station, spent the evening there on his cellphone, and left the next day. No punishment. It gets worse. A few months later, Madhoun persuaded a Gaza woman to blow up the very hospital, Soroka, where she was receiving burn treatment. She was caught with explosives attached to her underclothes. And worse: After extremists killed three Americans working for the State Department in Gaza in October 2003, they were put on trial for relatively minor offenses, then allowed to escape. All we get from Abbas are nice interviews to the western media explaining how he will persuade the militias to give up their guns, and the media write upbeat stories without bothering to note that in the meantime no terrorist has been arrested, tried, or sent to prison. The lawless, virtually feudal, criminal and terrorist factions within Gaza simply refuse to obey Abbas or to stop attacking Israel. He is so scared of them he has even rejected international appeals to dismantle the armed militias, saying the world should stop meddling in Palestinian internal affairs. Gaza will almost certainly determine the future of the region's peace prospects. Sadly, it is essentially becoming a Hamas base for launching missiles into Israeli communities. When Israel pulled out, it left behind, at no cost, thriving greenhouses. Hamas looters stripped a significant portion of them, depriving their own people of the windfall.
Hamas's leader, Mahmoud al-Zahar, said, "If we win the elections, Hamas will not shake Sharon's hand; we will continue to aim our gun barrels at his head."
(USN&WR, 10/31/05, 92) ..... TEHRAN, Iran (10/26/05, AP) -
Iranian Leader: Israel Will Be Destroyed.
Iran's hard-line president called for Israel to be "wiped off the map" and said a new wave of Palestinian attacks will destroy the Jewish
state. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also denounced attempts to recognize Israel or normalize relations with it.
JERUSALEM (AP, 11/08/05) - Israel's Magen David Adom
rescue service currently uses a red Star of David to identify its ambulances and
medical workers, rejecting the red cross used by most countries and the red
crescent preferred by Muslim nations. But Israel has not been permitted to use
its symbol on international humanitarian missions, and has been denied full
membership in the international Red
Cross for 57 years because of the issue. The Red Cross has said Israel
was excluded because it did not use an accepted symbol, but Israeli officials
have suggested the policy reflected international hostility toward the Jewish
state. The last major attempt to include Israel was five years ago and failed
because of increased Arab-Israeli tensions. The red crystal depicts a square
standing on one corner, with a blank white interior and a thick red border. Dr.
Noam Yifrach, chairman of Magen David Adom, said Israeli aid workers would be
able to insert a Star of David symbol into the crystal when working overseas.
The American Red Cross has also been campaigning for full Israeli membership for
years. It has withheld six years' of payment owed to the International
Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies - totaling approximately $34
million - since May 2000 in protest. The American Red Cross itself faces the
prospect of being excluded for not paying its dues, a gesture not lost on its
Israeli colleagues. "We are a small organization, and if they did not help
us, we simply would not be part of the Red Cross," Yifrach said. "We
are happy to go to sleep at night, knowing that overseas somebody is thinking
about us."

Israel
withdrew from every last inch of the Gaza Strip. The Israelis dismantled all
military bases, destroyed all their settlements, turned over functioning
greenhouses that could employ 4,000 people, expelled all 7,500 Israeli
settlers--all at a huge financial and political cost. Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon even went a step further, declaring the lines that divide Israel from
Gaza an international frontier, making Gaza the first independent Palestinian
territory ever. Everyone hoped then that the Palestinians would show the world
what they could achieve with freedom as a template for a future independent
state. Alas, they have shown us all too well. Not one day of peace has followed
since then. The pattern was set on the very day of Israel's pullout. Palestinian
militants fired rockets from Gaza into Israeli towns on the other side of the
border, targeting innocent civilians living in the pre-1967 Israel recognized by
the international community. The final straw came last month, with the Hamas
attack that killed two Israeli soldiers and resulted in the kidnapping of a
third. Last week, inspired by the rhetorical threats of Iran's incendiary
president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hezbollah--like Hamas, another Iranian
proxy--attacked Israel from the north, killing eight Israeli soldiers and
abducting two more, and then began raining rockets down onto Israel civilians.
The Palestinians failed to begin building schools, roads, and hospitals; they
made no effort to turn Gaza into a thriving state, nor did they create villages
of their own out of the settlements the Israeli government forced its settlers
to abandon. They vandalized the greenhouses not once, but twice. They elected a
radical Islamic Hamas government; they breached the border with Israel,
permitting the smuggling of huge quantities of weapons and creating new bases
for terrorism. Not only did Hamas fail to become more moderate; Fatah and the
Palestinians became even more radicalized, moving closer to Hamas's extremist
position, choosing to interpret Israel's voluntary evacuation not as a gesture
of peace but as a victory for the armed struggle. Terrorism in Gaza flourished,
tunnels were dug, more weapons were imported, militants trained, more Kassam
rockets were produced and fired at Israel. At first, the Israelis tried
nonlethal deterrence--diplomatic warnings, then sonic booms from fighter jets to
remind the Gazans that Israel has the power to retaliate. Those failed. It was a
sad demonstration of the truth in the metaphor that in the Middle East the law
of nature prevails--an animal perceived as weak invites only attack. The
Israelis fell back on targeted assassinations against the terrorist
leaders--exactly what America did against Abu Musab Zarqawi in Iraq, despite the
risk that innocents might be killed because the terrorists hide among civilians,
moral shields for immoral men.
The core of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute stems not from Israel's
unwillingness to compromise, but from the desire among Palestinians to eliminate
Israel is too powerful, the adherence to violence too pervasive, to overcome.
As the leading Egyptian paper, Al-Ahram, pointed out: "The
Palestinians must be aware by now that they can no longer count on Arab help,
economically, politically, or militarily . ... Arab nations have had enough ...
of the slogans and rhetoric that have gotten us nowhere. ... The Palestinians
have lost Arab backing both on the official and nonofficial levels." And
the CEO of the Arab News Agency Al Arabiya wrote, "Was the result
worth all the damage it caused?" The Middle East equation today could
hardly be more stark or depressing. It reveals once again that Hamas and the
Palestinians, now joined by Hezbollah, armed and financed by Iran, wish to get
rid of Israel. This will be a "long war" in which victory will be the
culmination of a series of unavoidable catastrophes. (USN&WR, 7/24/06, 60)

Israel: A brief history of the fight over a land the size
of New Jersey
WASHINGTON, April 15, 2011, Washington Times — According to
the U.S. State Department, Israel is about the size of New Jersey at 7,850
square miles. It’s bordered by the Mediterranean Sea (170 mile coastline),
Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. Over half of the country is dominated by the
4,633 square mile Negev desert. The areas most vehemently fought over today
include the approximately nine-mile Gaza Strip on the Mediterranean; the 2,270
square mile West Bank which includes the cities of Jericho and Bethlehem; a 27
square mile area called East Jerusalem; and the Golan Heights at 444 square
miles bordering Syria.
The struggle began about 3,700 years ago when
descendents of Abraham called Israel (the Jews) departed slavery in Egypt bound
for a land promised to them by God called Canaan. This land was already
inhabited by people generally called Arabs, many who were also descendents of
Abraham. The Jewish line comes from Abraham’s son Isaac while the Arab line
and future Muslims, in general, comes from another son, Ishmael. After many
years of war and assimilation, the Jews formed the first ever recorded
constitutional monarchy about 1000 B.C. (Before Christ). Their King David made
Jerusalem the nation's capital.
This same land area would eventually be called Palestine after the Roman
General Pompey put an end to Jewish sovereignty in 63 B.C. "Palestine"
is likely derived from the Philistines who dominated what is now called the Gaza
Strip until they were conquered by the Jews between 1200 B.C. and 1000 B.C. Between
1000 B.C. and 63 B.C. the land and people, including both Jews and Arabs,
experienced rule by various aggressor nations including Cyrus of Persia, the
Greek Alexander the Great, the Ptolemies of Egypt and the Seleucids of Syria.
The Romans, from the classical to the Byzantines, held power from 63 B.C.
to 638 A.D. (Anno Domini, Latin for “in the year of the Lord”) when
Muslim armies from Arabia invaded. During the long Roman rule, the Jews
attempted revolt on several occasions. The most notable being the Jewish-Roman
War of 66 – 73 A.D. leading to destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem and
banishment of the Jews. It was not until 317 A.D., that the emperor Constantine
legalized Christianity in the Roman Empire. The Jews were still technically
banished. Jerusalem had already become a holy place of worship and pilgrimage
for Jews, Christians and Muslims.
Around 1096 A.D., Christian Crusaders came from Europe, defeated the Muslims,
and re-established Christian rule in the land until around 1290 A.D. At this
point, Muslims re-conquered the whole area and would dominate until the end of
World War I. In 1917 the League of Nations’ Balfour Declaration gave the
region to Great Britain with a mandate to re-establish a national home for the
Jewish people. By 1937 the United Nation’s Peel Commission, concluded that a
sharing of the land by Jews and Arabs was unworkable.
During World War II, Nazi Germany killed six million Jews and displaced
many more across Europe. In 1947 the United Nations would pass a partition
resolution dividing the region into a Jewish and Arab state. In 1948 the British
left and the armies of Egypt, Transjordan (now Jordan), Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and
other Arab forces joined Arabs living in Palestine in a full-scale war against
the Jews. The war ended with a Jewish state and four United Nations arranged
armistice agreements between Israel and Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria. Gaza
was under Egyptian control and the West Bank under Jordan. Mideast Web says,
“Of the more than 800,000 Arabs who lived in Israeli-held territory before
1948, only about 170,000 remained. The rest became refugees in the surrounding
Arab countries, ending the Arab majority in the Jewish state.”
Israel was admitted to the United Nations in
1949. The Arab states refused to make peace with Israel. Wars broke out in 1956,
1967, 1973 and 1982 accompanied by a long string of terrorism and reprisals that
continue through today. Palestinian Arab nationalism became a serious political
movement after the 1967
Six-Day War and Israel's capture of the West Bank.
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/truth-be-told/2011/apr/15/israel-brief-history-fight-over-land-size-new-jers/

The true nature of Hamas must be fully understood. It is not just another nationalist political party. It is a radical Islamist terrorist group with a totalitarian DNA, just as it has been since its inception. Its leaders continue to support suicide-bombing terrorism. They describe the random murder of innocent civilians as a legitimate form of "self-defense," but they have also made it clear that they will not obstruct those who wish to attack Israel. According to the Arab newspaper al-Hayyat, their leading terrorist, Mohammed Deif, is even holding discussions with al
Qaeda. Hamas supported the Popular Resistance Committee, a terrorist group in Gaza, and appointed its leader, Jamal Abu Samhadana, as the head of the new security force, despite the fact that the PRC killed three Americans in the Gaza Strip in 2003--not to mention dozens of Israelis. Samhadana immediately restated his goal, "We have only one enemy. They are Jews. We have no other enemy. I will continue to carry the rifle and pull the trigger." Thus, a self-declared terrorist has been put in command of the Palestinian police force for the first time. Equally telling, the interior minister, Said Sayyam, has stated that Hamas will not sanction any security cooperation with Israel. On the contrary, it will coordinate terrorist activity against Israel.
Hamas is preparing to get rid of the Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, and it is collecting intelligence on the houses of the senior Fatah commanders in the security service who support him. When Abbas is gone, according to the Constitution, the parliamentary speaker, who is a Hamas member, would then become president in his stead. Eliminating Abbas is the last obstacle preventing Hamas from achieving full control of the Palestinian Authority--its security forces, its commercial authorities and monopolies, and other business interests and associations. It wants the gun and the
wallet. No one who knows the Hamas leaders expects them to mellow in office. If they exhibit any restraint at all, it will be short term, merely to improve their military equipment and deployment for the next round of confrontation. They cannot accept a lasting peace with Israel because they cannot accept Israel. The question beyond that, of course, is whether the Palestinian people can accept Israel. Palestinians have known all along what Hamas stands for. Now they are being so incited by Hamas, it seems less and less likely that, for years or even decades, any Palestinian government will be able to make the concessions necessary for a negotiated outcome with Israel.The surprise plan proposed last week by Abbas, giving Hamas 10 days to endorse the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel, is not to be taken seriously. Rather than a credible peace plan, it is a transparent effort to stop the internal political squabbling among the Palestinians.
The Israelis were moving closer to a real two-state solution. Israel's leadership and public opinion have declared a willingness to realign their borders and remove all Israeli civilians from 85 to 90 percent of the West Bank. Hamas, to no one's surprise, favors a one-state solution--that is, no Israel. Its hostility, however, also jeopardizes Israel's original scheme for pulling back: To leave Hamas in control of the West Bank would bring the terrorists and their Katyusha rockets within range of Israel's urban population centers and strategic targets. In danger would be Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and the major highways between them, along with Ben Gurion Airport.
For Hamas, nationalism exists only "as part and parcel of the religious faith." To Hamas, Palestine is Islamic land, and its covenant states: "God decreed Palestine to be a Muslim Trust for perpetuity," making the dispute not about territory and boundaries but about the need for Muslims to wage jihad until Israel no longer exists. The attitude of Hamas members toward Israel was captured by their foreign minister, who declared, "I dream of hanging a huge map of the world on the wall at my Gaza home, which does not show Israel on it." Hamas has rejected prior agreements reached with Israel with such contempt as to exasperate even the dovish former prime minister, Shimon Peres. "If they don't honor agreements," said Peres, "what is the point in negotiating with them?"
The Israeli settlers will have to be moved to settlement blocks cushioned from attack behind the security fence and beyond the range of terrorist rockets and guns. Israel will also have to retain a presence along the Jordan River so as to preclude the inflow of terrorists and weaponry, in order to respond on a timely basis to its intelligence. To continue its remarkable success in thwarting the vast majority of terrorist attacks, Israel must retain its security bases in the West
Bank. It is a modern-day version of the policy of David Ben-Gurion, Israel's founding prime minister. As he put it: "When it was a question of all the land without a Jewish state or a Jewish state without all the land, we chose the Jewish state without all the land."
(USN&WR, 6/5/06, 60)

Why
Israel Needs the Bomb
OCTOBER
18, 2010, WSJ
It's
the only country whose right to exist is routinely
questioned, and its
conventional military superiority in the region is being challenged.
Sixty-five
years after Germany's campaign to exterminate the Jews, of the many
countries in the world Israel is the only one repeatedly subjected
to calls for its extinction. Though Pakistan and India, like Israel
and the Arabs, have suffered population exchange and territorial
wars, neither questions the other's right to exist. So rare and
extreme is such a position that one might think the countries of
Europe, so many of which cooperated in hunting down their Jews,
would do more to recognize its endemic presence in the Middle East.
They
don't—their publics having largely accepted that, in regard to the
question of Palestine, Arabs were the victims and Jews the
victimizers and colonialists to boot. Even though, strangely for
colonialists, the Jews had no mother country and it was their armed
struggle that ejected Great Britain from the Levant. Conveniently
forgotten is that the Jews accepted partition and the Arabs did not;
that half the Palestinians who left in 1948 did so of their own
volition; that more Jews left and were expelled from Arab countries
than Arabs left and were expelled from Palestine; that Arabs were
able to remain in Israel whereas the Arab states are effectively
Judenrein; that Israel ceded the Sinai for a paper treaty, and Gaza
in return for nothing but rockets and bombs; that, amidst a sea of
Islamic states, it has accepted a Palestinian state while the
Palestinians indignantly refuse to recognize it as a Jewish state;
and that it was ready to compromise even on Jerusalem had Yasser
Arafat been willing to take yes for an answer.
And
conveniently forgotten in fallacious references to a cycle of
violence is that—following from their oft-stated call for the
destruction of Israel— Hamas, Hezbollah (which is more or less an
Iranian expeditionary force), Iran itself, and the Arab
confrontation states are the parties that want to change the status
quo, by violence and by their own flamboyant admission.
It
exists, they assert that it has no right to exist, they act to
destroy it, and then they claim that they are resisting it. Last
week, the Iranian president traveled 1,000 miles from Tehran to
stand on Israel's border and threaten annihilation. One can only
imagine the hysteria—not only in Iran but in London and Paris—if
Israel's prime minister were to go to the Iranian border and do the
same.
In
many quarters, such startling asymmetricality in regard to the
question of Palestine, which is also the question of Israel, is made
acceptable by the conviction that as long as the Palestinian
refugees remain unassimilated by their brethren, and as long as
their flag doesn't fly from the Mediterranean to the Jordan, they
are the underdog. Of course, the underdog is not always right, and
nor are the Palestinians, backed by the power of the Arab states and
Iran, exactly the underdog.
The
popular view of Israel as a "regional superpower" that at
little cost to itself rolls over its opponents has for decades been
sustained by Arab propaganda, Western anti-Semitism, and Israeli
braggadocio. It exempts those who subscribe to it from the burden of
knowing the orders of battle and the geography and history of the
conflict, and—in regard to Israel's ongoing casualties or in the
event of its destruction—serves as a preset moral salve.
But
Israel has seldom gotten off easily. In the 1948
War of Independence it had 30,000 casualties, including 6,000 dead,
which given its population was proportionally as if today 2.6
million Americans were killed, more than all the deaths in all the
wars in our history. In the 1967
War, in just six days of battle that created the legend of its
invincibility, the proportional figure is 118,000—20 times the
number of Americans killed in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001. The
numbers for the subsequent War of Attrition are much the same,
higher for the October War of 1973,
and civilian and military deaths continue even through relatively
peaceful interludes.
In
1973, having
overwhelmed the Bar-Lev Line, crossed the Suez Canal, downed a
significant portion of the Israeli Air Force, and penetrated deep
into the Sinai, an elated Egyptian army found itself with virtually
nothing between it and Israel's heartland. The accepted narrative is
that the Egyptians could not conceive of going forward, were
frightened, and had insufficient supply. They could conceive
fighting in Israel. They had fought there in 1948, and sat on the
border for all but six years since. Having beaten back the Israelis,
they were anything but frightened, and their lines of supply were
adequate. But knowing that had they continued, their concentrations
of armor would have been vulnerable to tactical nuclear weapons,
that if Israel's existence hung in the balance so would Cairo's and
Alexandria's, and that the whole of Egypt could drown in the flood
of a breached Aswan Dam, they went no farther.
Partly
as a result of the steady development of Saudi air power in response
to Iraq and Iran, Israel's potential antagonists are closing the gap
in numbers and quality, and the Israeli Air Force does not offer the
same margin of safety that once it did. With the Arabs' approaching
1.3/1 advantage in first-line aircraft, 2.9/1 in second-line
aircraft, and an enormous 12/1 advantage in mobile air defense, many
new options open if Arab unity coalesces as it did prior to the
three major Arab- Israeli wars, in all of which Israel's existence
was at stake and the result unpredictable. If Turkey is included, as
it might be, Israel's prospects become seriously darker.
Other
than a direct nuclear strike, what it most has to fear is that a
combination of states will throw all their aircraft against it at
once while advancing a surface-to-air-missile umbrella to threaten
Israeli planes and provide sanctuary for its own. Though the Israeli
Air Force is qualitatively superior and its imaginative responses
cannot be counted out, the steadily improving professionalism of the
Arab air forces, their first rate American and European equipment,
their surface-to-air-missile shield, and most importantly their
mass, are potentially a mortal threat. For if the Israeli Air Force
is sufficiently degraded, Israel's prospects on the ground will
follow proportionately.
In
light of the fact that the conventional balance can change and is
changing, one of the many purposes of Iran's drive for nuclear
weapons is not merely to wait for a lucky shot at Tel Aviv but to
neutralize Israel's nuclear deterrent so as to allow a series of
conventional battles to advance Israel's downfall incrementally.
The
military strategy of Israel's enemies is now to alter the
conventional balance while either equipping themselves with nuclear
weapons or denying them to Israel, or both. Their calls for equation
of the two sides in a nuclear-free Middle East leave out the lack of
equation in aims. Israel cannot dream of conquering its adversaries
and replacing them with a Jewish state. But from war to war its
adversaries have made their intentions clear, and as their mass and
wealth are applied to their militaries over time, Israel's last line
of defense in a continual state of siege is the nuclear arsenal
devoted solely to preserving its existence.
Mr.
Helprin, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute, is the author
of, among other works, "Winter's Tale" (Harcourt), "A
Soldier of the Great War" (Harcourt) and, most recently,
"Digital Barbarism" (HarperCollins).
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703673604575550020606362444.html

ISRAEL (11/9/05,
from an e-mail, unverified)
The Middle East has been growing date palms for centuries. The average Israeli
date trees are now yielding 400 pounds/year and are short enough to be harvested
from the ground or a short ladder.
The cell phone was developed in Israel by Israelis working in the Israeli branch
of Motorola, which has its largest development center in Israel.
Most of the Windows NT and XP operating systems were developed by
Microsoft-Israel.
The Pentium MMX Chip technology was designed in Israel at Intel.
Both the Pentium-4 microprocessor and the Centrino processor were entirely
designed, developed and produced in Israel.
The Pentium microprocessor in your computer was most likely made in Israel.
Voice mail technology was developed in Israel.
Both Microsoft and Cisco built their only R&D facilities outside the US in
Israel.
The technology for the AOL Instant Messenger ICQ was developed in 1996 by
four young Israelis.
Israel has the fourth largest air force in the world (after the U.S., Russia and
China). In addition to a large variety of other aircraft, Israel's air force has
an aerial arsenal of over 250 F-16's. This is the largest fleet of F-16 aircraft
outside of the U. S.
Israel's $100 billion economy is larger than all of its immediate neighbors
combined.
Israel has the highest percentage in the world of home computers per capita.
According to industry officials, Israel designed the airline industry's most
impenetrable flight security. US officials now look (finally) to Israel
for advice on how to handle airborne security threats.
Israel has the highest ratio of university degrees to the population in
the world.
Israel produces more scientific papers per capita than any other nation by a
large margin - 109 per 10,000 people --as well as one of the highest per capita
rates of patents filed.
In proportion to its population, Israel has the largest number of startup
companies in the world. In absolute terms, Israel has the largest number of
startup companies than any other country in the world, except the U.S. (3,500
companies mostly in hi-tech).
With more than 3,000 high-tech companies and startups, Israel has the highest
concentration of hi-tech companies in the world -- apart from the Silicon
Valley, U. S.
Israel is ranked #2 in the world for venture capital funds right behind the U.
S.
Outside the United States and Canada, Israel has the largest number of NASDAQ
listed companies.
Israel has the highest average living standards in the Middle East.
The per capita income in 2000 was over $17,500, exceeding that of the UK.
On a per capita basis, Israel has the largest number of biotech startups.
Twenty-four per cent of Israel's workforce holds university degrees, ranking
third in the industrialized world, after the United States and Holland and 12
per cent hold advanced degrees.
Israel is the only liberal democracy in the Middle East.
In 1984 and 1991, Israel airlifted a total of 22,000 Ethiopian Jews (Operation
Solomon) at risk in Ethiopia, to safety in Israel.
When Golda Meir was elected Prime Minister of Israel in 1969, she became the
world's second elected female leader in modern times.
When the U. S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya was bombed in 1998, Israeli rescue
teams were on the scene within a day -- and saved three victims from the rubble.
Israel has the third highest rate of entrepreneurship -- and the highest rate
among women and among people over 55 - in the world.
Relative to its population, Israel is the largest immigrant-absorbing
nation on earth. Immigrants come in search of democracy, religious freedom, and
economic opportunity. (Hundreds of thousands from the former Soviet Union)
Israel was the first nation in the world to adopt the Kimberly process, an
international standard that certifies diamonds as "conflict
free."
Israel has the world's second highest per capita of new books.
Israel is the only country in the world that entered the 21st century with a net
gain in its number of trees, made more remarkable because this was achieved in
an area considered mainly desert.
Israel has more museums per capita than any other country.
Medicine... Israeli scientists developed the first fully computerized,
no-radiation, diagnostic instrumentation for breast cancer.
An Israeli company developed a computerized system for ensuring proper
administration of medications, thus removing human error from medical treatment.
Every year in U. S. hospitals 7,000 patients die from treatment mistakes.
Israel's Givun Imaging developed the first ingestible video camera, so small it
fits inside a pill. Used to view the small intestine from the inside, cancer and
digestive disorders.
Researchers in Israel developed a new device that directly helps the heart pump
blood, an innovation with the potential to save lives among those with heart
failure. The new device is synchronized with the camera helps doctors diagnose
heart's mechanical operations through a sophisticated system of sensors.
Israel leads the world in the number of scientists and technicians in the
workforce, with 145 per 10,000, as opposed to 85 in the U. S., over 70 in Japan,
and less than 60 in Germany. With over 25% of its work force employed in
technical professions. Israel places first in this category as well.
A new acne treatment developed in Israel, the Clear Light device, produces a
high-intensity, ultraviolet-light-free, narrow-band blue light that causes acne
bacteria to self-destruct -- all without damaging surrounding skin or tissue.
An Israeli company was the first to develop and install a large-scale
solar-powered and fully functional electricity generating plant, in southern
California's Mojave desert.
All the above while engaged in regular wars with an implacable enemy that seeks
its destruction, and an economy continuously under strain by having to spend
more per capita on its own protection than any other county on earth.
. . . AND THE FRENCH AMBASSADOR IN ENGLAND SAYS : "ISRAEL IS
NOTHING BUT A SHITTY LITTLE COUNTRY"

Special Report: Why Hezbollah Fights
To understand Hezbollah, it is important to begin with this point: Almost all
Muslim Arabs opposed the creation of the state of Israel. Not all of them
supported, or support today, the creation of an independent Palestinian state or
recognize the Palestinian people as a distinct nation. This is a vital and
usually overlooked distinction that is the starting point in our thinking.
When Israel was founded, three distinct views emerged among Arabs. The first was
that Israel was a part of the British mandate created after World War I and
therefore should have been understood as part of an entity stretching from the
Mediterranean to the other side of Jordan, from the border of the Sinai, north
to Mount Hermon. Therefore, after 1948, the West Bank became part of the other
part of the mandate, Jordan.
There was a second view that argued that there was a single province of the
Ottoman Empire called Syria and that all of this province -- what today is
Israel, Jordan, Lebanon and the country of Syria -- is legitimately part of it.
This obviously was the view of Syria, whose policy was and in some ways
continues to be that Syria province, divided by Britain and France after World
War I, should be reunited under the rule of Damascus.
A third view emerged after the establishment of Israel, pioneered by Gamal Abdel
Nasser in Egypt. This view was that there is a single Arab nation that should be
gathered together in a United Arab Republic. This republic would be socialist,
more secular than religious and, above all, modernizing, joining the rest of the
world in industrialization and development.
All of these three views rejected the existence of Israel, but each had very
different ideas of what ought to succeed it. The many different Palestinian
groups that existed after the founding of Israel and until 1980 were not simply
random entities. They were, in various ways, groups that straddled these three
opinions, with a fourth added after 1967 and pioneered by Yasser Arafat. This
view was that there should be an independent Palestinian state, that it should
be in the territories occupied by Israel in 1967, extend to the original state
of Israel and ultimately occupy Jordan as well. That is why, in September 1970,
Arafat tried to overthrow King Hussein in Jordan. For Arafat, Amman, Jerusalem
and Tel Aviv were all part of the Palestinian homeland.
After the Iranian revolution, a fifth strain emerged. This strain made a general
argument that the real issue in the Islamic world was to restore religious-based
government. This view opposed the pan-Arab vision of Nasser with the pan-Islamic
vision of Khomeini. It regarded the particular nation-states as less important
than the type of regime they had. This primarily Shiite view was later
complemented by what was its Sunni counterpart. Rooted partly in Wahhabi Sunni
religiosity and partly in the revolutionary spirit of Iran, its view was that
the Islamic nation-states were the problem and that the only way to solve it was
a transnational Islamic regime -- the caliphate -- that would restore the power
of the Islamic world.
That pedantic lesson complete, we can now locate Hezbollah's ideology and
intentions more carefully. Hezbollah is a Shiite radical group that grew out of
the Iranian revolution. However, there is a tension in its views, because it
also is close to Syria. As such, it is close to a much more secular partner,
more in the Nasserite tradition domestically. But it also is close to a country
that views Lebanon, Jordan and Israel as part of greater Syria, the Syria torn
apart by the British and French.
There are deep contradictions ideologically between Iran and Syria, though they
share a common interest. First, they both oppose the Sunnis. Remember that when
Lebanon first underwent invasion in 1975, it was by Syria intervening on behalf
of Christian friends and against the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Syria hated Arafat because Arafat insisted on an independent Palestinian state
and Syria opposed it. This was apart from the fact that Syria had business
interests in Lebanon that the PLO was interfering with. Iran also opposed the
PLO because of its religious/ethnic orientation; moreso because it was secular
and socialist.
Hezbollah emerged as a group representing Syrian and Iranian interests. These
were:
Morotola consumer products are sold globally, including its cell phones,
cordless and corded phones, the Droid phone, accessories, cable modems, digital
video equipment, and more.
Estee Lauder
Board Member Ronald Lauder chairs the Jewish National Fund and is former a
JNF president. In 1901, the Fifth Zionist Congress established it to
"purchase, take on lease or in exchange, or otherwise acquire any lands,
forests, rights of possession and other rights....for the purpose of settling
Jews ."
JNF calls itself "Caretakers of the land of Israel for over a century
(and) a global environmental leader by planting 240 million trees, building over
200 reservoirs and dams, developing over 250,000 acres of land, creating more
than 1,000 parks, providing infrastructure for over 1,000 communities (and)
bringing life to the Negev Desert," exclusively for Jews.
JNF develops land. It doesn't sell it, but can lease it to Jews or any
Jewish-controlled company, organization or entity. It holds these lands on
behalf of "the Jewish People in perpetuity." Non-Jews are entirely
excluded from renting or buying property, getting financing, opening a business,
or doing virtually anything on Jewish land under a strict apartheid policy. JNF
policies have been legally challenged, so far without success.
Besides Ronald, other Lauders are also involved - Leonard, Evelyn and
William. The company produces skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care
products that include Clinique, Aramis, Lab Series, Prescriptives and Origins.
Acquired brands include M*A*C, Bobbi Brown, La Mer, Jo Malone, Aveda, Bumble and
Bumble, Darphin, and Ojon. It's also the fragrance and beauty products licensee
for Kiton, Tommy Hilfiger, Donna Karan, Michael Kors, Sean John, Missoni, Tom
Ford, and Mustang.
Other products sold through alternative channels include American Beauty,
Flirt!, good skin, Daisy Fuentes, Coach, and Eyes by Design. The company is
headquartered in New York, with many stores nationally and in Canada operating
Estee Lauder "counters."
L'Oreal/Body Shop
L'Oreal Israel makes a line of Natural Sea Beauty products using Dead Sea
minerals. In July 2008, the company also gave a $100,000 "lifetime
achievement" award to an Israeli Weizmann Institute scientist, a research
center that clandestinely develops nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons for
the IDF war machine.
In addition, L'Oreal Israel's chairman, Gad Propper, is the founding
chairman of the Israel-EU Chamber of Commerce, and was heavily involved in
promoting trade with Australia and New Zealand. Since the mid-1990s, Israel has
been L'Oreal's regional commercial center.
Its brands include Maybelline, Lancome, Matrix, Redken, Vichy/Dermablend,
and Helena Rubinstein. It also owns the Body Shop, a company reputed to be
socially conscious.
Intel
The technology giant produces computer processors and other hardware
components employing thousands of Israelis. It's been one of Israel's major
supporters since opening its first development center outside America in Haifa
in 1974. Ever since, it's heavily invested in the country and operates an annual
billion dollar export business. It has a microprocessor plant in Har Hotzvim,
Jerusalem, another development center there as well, a plant in Lachish-Qiryat
Gat, a branch for the development of network communications products in Omer,
close to Beersheba, as well as other operations.
McDonald's
It's the world's largest fast food retailer, operating in about 120
countries globally, including in Israel since 1993, with about 150 restaurants. McDonald's
is also a major partner of the Jewish United Fund (JUF) and Jewish Federation.
Through its Israel Commission, JUF "works to maintain American military,
economic and diplomatic support for Israel; monitors and, when necessary,
responds to media coverage of Israel."
Coca-Cola
The company is the world's largest soft drink maker, with numerous brands
sold virtually everywhere globally. Since the mid-1960s, it's been been a
staunch Israel supporter, and in 1997, the country's Chamber of Commerce and
Economic Mission praised its chairman, Roberto Goizueta, for 30 years of support
and for refusing to honor an Arab boycott at the expense of lost regional
business. In 2002, Coca-Cola announced plans to build a Kiryat Gat plant, and in
2005, raised its investment in the Israeli-based Tavor Winery to 51%.
Disney
The company's Florida Epcot Center Millennium exhibition depicts
Jerusalem as Israel's capital, a joint effort by Tel Aviv and Disney to Judaize
the city preparatory to legitimizing Israel's claim. Israel's Foreign Ministry,
in charge of the exhibit, says it highlights the city's importance to Muslims,
Christians and Jews alike, but a formal statement asserts:
"There is no doubt that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel (and)
the position of Jerusalem as the key component to the Israeli
pavilion....speaks for itself without a clearer or stronger statement being
necessary."
Home Depot
As the world's largest home improvement retailer, it's second only to
Wal-Mart in total retail sales. Its founder and former chairman, Bernard Marcus,
actively supports Israel, including through the Marcus Foundation promoting
Jewish issues.
In addition, he's a board member of Emet (Hebrew for "truth")
News Service, reporting pro-Israeli propaganda, analysis and commentary to
ensure all US media are on board, and why not with a board of directors
including Marcus; Lex Wexner, The Limited's founder; Edgar Bronfman Sr.,
Seagram's former head; Lou Ranieri, a major Wall Street figure and Israeli bank
owner; and former UN ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick. Before he died, Jack Kemp
also served on the board.
IBM
The company invests heavily in Israel, and according to former executive,
Lawrence Ricciardi, "This wedge of land and the huge ideals it represents
are very important to IBM."
In June 2001, the American-Israel Friendship League praised the company
and two others at its Partners for Democracy Award dinner. In May 2002, the
Israel-America Chamber of Commerce gave IBM the Ambassador's Award "in
recognition of its outstanding contribution to the development of the Israeli
high-tech industry and (for) advancing trade between the US and Israel."
IBM began its regional operations in 1949 and was the first large US
company with a wholly owned Israeli subsidiary. Its Haifa Research Laboratories
employs over 2,000 people doing extensive research cooperatively with the
US-based operations. For decades, it's also been involved with Israeli start-ups
and venture capital funds.
Revlon
Billionaire Ronald Perelman controls the company, a major producer of
cosmetics, skin care, fragrance and personal care products. He also supports
Israeli causes, and is a trustee of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, with over
300,000 global members and support from prominent figures like himself, George
W. Bush, Barack Obama, Senator Charles Schumer, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and many
others.
Starbucks
Chairman Howard Shultz is staunchly pro-Israel. In 1998, the Jerusalem
Fund of Aish HaTorah gave him "The Israel 50th Anniversary Friend of Zion
Tribute Award" for "playing a key role in promoting a close alliance
between the United States and Israel." In 2002, Israel's Foreign Ministry
praised him for being key to the country's long-term PR success, asking
Americans to back Israel against a common enemy, and sponsoring fund raisers for
Israeli causes. Jointly with the Israeli-based Delek Group, Starbucks Coffee
International operated a joint venture in Israel, opened six stores, then shut
them after heavy losses.
The Limited
The company is a major retailer with five specialty brands, including
Express, The Limited, Lane Bryant, Lerner New York and Structure as well as the
major ownership of Intimate Brands.
Its founder and CEO, Leslie Wexner, is a board member of the pro-Israeli
Emet News Service, and through his Wexner Foundation promotes
"strengthening Jewish Leadership in North America and Israel." One of
its initiatives finances up to 10 Israeli officials at Harvard annually for a
year-long Master in Public Administration program (MPA) combined with intensive
leadership development. Many alumni return home to high ministerial positions
and similar IDF ones. Wexner also sponsors "Birthright Israel" that
brings young American Jews to the country for intensive indoctrination. He
supports Hillel, Israel's bastion on college campuses.
News Corporation
It's the Rupert Murdoch-owned media giant that includes dozens of print
publications, motion pictures, book publishing, and Fox News, what Fairness
& Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) calls "the most biased name in
news....with its extraordinary right-wing tilt" that includes one-sided
Israeli support, and no wonder.
Murdoch invests heavily in Israel and was one of three US companies the
American-Israel Friendship League honored for their support at their June 2001
Partners for Democracy Awards dinner. Murdoch, in fact, co-chaired the dinner,
was a close friend of Ariel Sharon, calls himself a lifelong ally of Israel, and
shows it through one-sided reporting allowing no wiggle room for staff
deviation.
Sara Lee
It's the world's largest clothing manufacturer, owning in whole or in part
familiar brands, including Hanes, Playtex, Champion, Leggs, and Wonderbra. Its
food brands include Sara Lee, Ball Park, Hillshire Farm, and Jimmy Dean, and its
global businesses include Fresh Bakery, North American Retail, Foodservice,
International Beverage, International Bakery, and International Household and
Body Care. It also owns a 30% stake in the Israeli company Delta Galil. More on
it below.
In 1998, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu awarded Sara Lee
Personal Products executive Lucien Nessim (from its European subsidiary) its
highest honor, the Jubilee Award, in recognition of those individuals or
organizations who've helped Israel's economy most through trade and investments.
Many other companies and/or their officials have also won it, including
Johnson and Johnson, the UK retailer Marks & Spencer, the French food
company Danone, Kimberly-Clark, L'Oreal, Nestle, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Pratt
& Whitney, Volkswagon, De Beers, Goldman Sachs, Archer Daniel Midland, Cisco
Systems, Motorola, AOL, formerly AOL/Time Warner, and numerous others.
Major Israeli companies include:
Delta Galil Industries Ltd.
Israel's largest textile manufacturer produces clothing and underwear for
popular brands including, Gap, J-Crew, JC Penny, Calvin Klein, Playtex,
Victoria's Secret, Hugo Boss, Banana Republic, Ralph Lauren, and others.
Ahava
From its Mitzpe Shalem settlement facility, the company produces cosmetics
using Dead Sea salt, minerals, and mud, natural substances extracted from the
Dead Sea.
Dorot Garlic and Herbs
Established in 1992 in Kibbutz Dorot, the company is now Israel's largest
frozen seasonings supplier to food retainers, hotels, and restaurants in
America, Canada and Europe.
The Strauss Group and Its Subsidiaries
Israel's second largest food and beverage company supports the Golani
reconnaissance platoon, infamous for its decades of slaughtering Palestinians,
most recently during Operation Cast Lead.
In the "corporate responsibility" section of its website, a
sub-heading titled "In the Field With Soldiers" states:
"Our connection with soldiers goes as far back as the country, and
even further. We see a mission and need to continue to provide our soldiers
with support, to enhance their quality of life and service conditions, and
sweeten their special moments....at the front to spoil them with our best
products," including Max Brenner Chocolates.
Sabra is another Strauss company in a joint venture with Pepsico. It
produces traditional Arab salads like hummus, baba ghanoush, and fried eggplant.
Agrexco
The company is half Israeli state-owned, exporting fresh fruits,
vegetables, and herbs from Israel and the Occupied Territories, operating under
the Carmel, Jaffa and Coral brands.
Hadiklaim
The Israeli Date Growers' Cooperative sells 65% of all Israeli and West
Bank settlement-produced dates under the brand names King Solomon and Jordan
River. They also supply supermarkets and retail chains that market them under
their own private brands. Customers include UK-based Marks & Spencer,
Sainsbury, Tesco and Waitrose.
In July 2006, Israeli settlement-made consumer products/factories:
http://baltimorechronicle.com/2010/020210Lendman.shtml
(Baltimore Chronicle, 2/2/10)

Comprehensive
history
Gary Katz, CBC News Online
IN THE BEGINNING
The land that the State of Israel sits on is small enough to fit into New
Brunswick (Canada) three and a half times, but you can't get from Mesopotamia to
the Nile by chariot without crossing it. It's been controlled by Canaanites,
Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Egyptians, Romans, Arabs,
Turks, and the British and it's deeply embedded into the passions and the
history of Muslims, Christians, and Jews.
When the Israelites travelled eastward across the Sinai Desert in their exodus
from Egypt over three thousand years ago, the land they were aiming for was
called Canaan. Their tradition was that God had promised the land to the
patriarch Abraham and his descendants. Jericho, the first town in the West Bank
lands to be given Palestinian self-rule by Israel (1994), is famous for its
place in an Old Testament story involving Joshua, trumpets and tumbling walls.
It goes back 10,000 years and is the oldest settlement ever uncovered.
Around 1000 BC, after successful conquests, the land became the Hebrew state of
Israel, named after the patriarch Jacob who was renamed Israel by God. Its first
kings were the famous trio of Saul, David, and Solomon. A century later, after
Solomon's death, the country was divided into two and the southern portion named
Judah. In 721 BC, Israel was destroyed by the Assyrians and its inhabitants
disappeared from history as "The Ten Lost Tribes of Israel".
In 587 BC, Judah was conquered by the Babylonians, and the Jews (from the name
"Judah") were deported into exile. 50 years later, when the Persians
under Cyrus the Great overcame the Babylonians, the Jews were permitted home
again to rebuild Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem which the Babylonians had
destroyed.
Between the Persians and the Roman occupation around the time of Christ, the
land was under the control of Alexander the Great, the Ptolemies of Egypt, and
the Seleucids of Syria. A brief Jewish dynasty resulted from a national uprising
by Judas Maccabeus (the source of the festival of Hannuka) but by the middle of
the century Before Christ, Romans were in control of the province they called
Judea. In 70 AD the Romans destroyed Jerusalem (and the Temple) and again most
of the Jews were dispersed from the land.
In the early seventh century a new religion came blazing out of Arabia fueled
with the word of the prophet Mohammed and afire with his admonition to spread
it. Islam (meaning "submission" or "surrender" to Allah's
will) was seen by Mohammed as a continuation of Judaism and Christianity, and
his God was the same as in both the Old and New Testaments. His followers spread
quickly throughout the middle east (and much further). Except for several years
of Christian control during the Crusades, Palestine remained in Muslim hands,
first Arab then Turk, for 1300 years until the end of World War One.
The Twentieth Century
The empire of the Ottoman Turks had existed since the middle of the fifteenth
century and included the ancient land of Palestine and much that surrounded it.
Turkey had sided with losing Germany in World War One and was carved up
afterward by victorious Britain and France. By that time- the early 1920s-
Jewish immigration into Palestine had already begun on a small but regular
scale. There were 85,000 Jews in Palestine by the beginning of the war. By 1925
it was closer to 110,000.
Zionism, an organized movement to settle Jews in Palestine, had increased its
activity in the late nineteenth century as a result of growing, violent
anti-Semitism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Zionists were immensely hopeful
when, in 1917, the British foreign secretary Lord Balfour put into writing
Britain's support for "the establishment in Palestine of a national home
for the Jewish people." He didn't, however, suggest turning the country
into a Jewish state. When the League of Nations made Palestine a British mandate
after the war, Lord Balfour's declaration was assumed as part of the deal and
the allied powers of the Great War all agreed.
It was the people whose land it was that objected.
Britain quickly discovered that the idea of a Jewish homeland in Palestine was
immensely unpopular among the residents of the area (except the Jewish settlers
already there). For the years between the World Wars Jewish immigration and Arab
hostility to it both continued while Britain tried to avoid doing anything
wrong, which meant avoiding doing anything at all. By 1935 there were 300,000
Jews in Palestine. Tel Aviv, founded in 1909, had 100,000 people.
As conditions in Nazi Germany worsened throughout the thirties, the need for
Jewish sanctuary in Palestine grew but conflicted with British needs to woo Arab
support in case of war. In 1939 Britain declared that Jewish land purchases in
Palestine would be cut back sharply for the next five years and then stopped
altogether.
Then came the War. When it was over in 1945, the case for a Jewish homeland was
stronger than it had ever been. The problem was both practical and emotional.
The practical issue was the hundreds of thousands of Jews in Europe who had no
homes to return to and little or no family left alive. 2.3 million of the eight
million Jews who had lived in German- occupied Europe were still alive. They had
to go somewhere. The emotional problem was the guilt and sadness that resulted
from the revelation of the millions who hadn't survived. The Jewish homeland
question was front and centre.
In 1947 Britain, which had been handed the Palestine problem by the now-defunct
League of Nations passed it on, with relief, to the newly born United Nations.
The UN agreed to partition Palestine into a Jewish state, an Arab state, and a
neutral UN zone containing Jerusalem, a city sacred to three religions. The Jews
were thrilled, the Arabs adamantly opposed.
In late 1947 the plan was ratified by the UN, and the State of Israel proclaimed
on May 14, 1948. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled the country or were
evicted, the British pulled out completely, and most of the Arab world- Egypt,
Transjordan (now Jordan), Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon, as well as Palestinians-
immediately attacked in an attempt to destroy Israel. By the time of armistice
in 1949 Israel held three quarters of Palestine- twice as much land as the UN
had proposed- Jordan had taken the land on the West Bank of the Jordan River,
and Egypt had taken the Gaza Strip. The Palestinians had nothing.
TWO HISTORIES
Israel
The year of Israel's twenty-fifth anniversary, 1973, marked the fourth all-out
war in the area. The state was one day old when the first assault occurred.
Surrounded by Egypt on the west, Jordan on the east, Syria and Lebanon on the
north, and with Iraq close enough to be a danger, Israel managed to end that war
with more land than it started with. Among it was the new section of the city of
Jerusalem that was to be part of an international zone administered by the UN.
Jordan took the old city, also meant to be in the neutral area.
In 1956 Egypt moved to nationalize the Suez Canal (up until then owned by a
corporation dominated by France and Britain) and, as well, prevent Israeli
shipping through the Strait of Tiran into the Gulf of Aqaba, the country's
access to the Red Sea. Israel allied with France and Britain and, by the
cease-fire, had taken the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt. They
were convinced by the UN, which set up a peacekeeping force in the area, to
return the land to Egypt in return for assurances that Israeli shipping rights
would be protected.
By 1967 Arab nationalism and Egyptian anger toward Israel had both increased
dramatically. Egypt demanded removal of the UN troops which had been stationed
in the area since the Suez Crisis and, when they were gone, again threatened
Israeli shipping by blocking access to the Gulf of Aqaba. In what became known
as the 'Six Day War' Israel destroyed the Egyptian air force on the ground and,
with military supremacy assured, headed west across Sinai. Though they again
faced the circle of their Arab neighbours, they gained more ground, capturing
Gaza, parts of the Egyptian Sinai desert, taking the West Bank lands and old
Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights on Israel's northern border with
Syria. This time, they refused to return any part of their spoils of war.
The Arab world responded with a united policy on Israel: no peace, no
negotiation, and certainly no recognition. Guerrilla violence in Israel
escalated with neighbouring countries, chiefly Jordan, used as bases for attack.
In 1973 (the Yom Kippur War), Egypt attacked Sinai while Syria attacked the
Golan Heights. Other Arab countries contributed troops and aid. Israel again
prevailed, driving further into Syria and encircling the entire Egyptian Third
Army in Sinai, clearing a path to Cairo.
But finally, after a quarter century of warring, everyone seemed to accept the
futility of looking for a military solution. Israel was not about to be driven
into the Mediterranean. In December, the first Arab-Israeli peace conference was
convened in Geneva, Switzerland and the expression "shuttle diplomacy"
soon entered the language.
Palestine
Ten years after hundreds of thousands of Palestinians left their homes they were
still homeless and no one seemed to care. Some had been taken in by surrounding
countries but many lived in camps. In the West there was support for the Jewish
state based on political expediency (the U.S. needed allies in the region),
affiliation (the Jewish population outside of Israel supported the state
politically and financially), and humanitarianism (the Holocaust was still
vividly and appallingly recent). The West also seemed to think that the
Palestinians who left should have been absorbed easily into the lands of their
neighbours. That's a bit like giving Saskatchewan to the Kurds and expecting the
displaced to be absorbed effortlessly into Alberta and Manitoba.
In the late fifties an underground group was formed to push for the destruction
of the state of Israel. It was called al-Fatah and its leader was a 29-year-old
engineer named Yasser Arafat. Arafat was born in Jerusalem and had been involved
in '48 smuggling guns to the Arabs, and in '56 as a soldier in the Egyptian
army. He'd also trained commandos and edited an anti-Zionist magazine.
In 1964 the Palestine Liberation Organization was formed to co-ordinate the
growing number of Palestinian groups fighting against Israel. In 1969 Arafat
became chairman of the PLO. It was a PLO group, Black September, that murdered
11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics in 1972. Though the organization was
an umbrella for a wide range of pro-Palestinian groups, it was perceived clearly
in the West as a purely terrorist organization. It's avowed objective was the
total removal of Israel from Palestine.
In 1974, less than a year after the first Arab-Israeli talks began, the PLO was
given official status by the UN and the Arab world accepted it as a Palestinian
government in exile.
ROAD TO WYE PLANTATION
From Camp David to Wye Plantation
It was Henry Kissinger, U.S. Secretary of State under President Richard Nixon,
who made "shuttle diplomacy" a buzzword. Kissinger was already an
acclaimed negotiator when he got between Egypt and Israel, having shared the
Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in Vietnam. In December of 1973, in the
aftermath of the "Yom Kippur War," the first Arab-Israeli peace
conference opened in Geneva, Switzerland.
By early 1974, with Kissinger flitting from side to side, Israeli and Egyptian
troops were disengaged, and by May the Israelis and the Syrians were
disentangled. Israel returned some of the land it took from Syria and UN buffer
zones were created between the antagonists.
In 1977 a dramatic step was taken toward peace in a region that had known
nothing but war for far too long. Egyptian President Anwar al-Sadat visited
Jerusalem - an unthinkable idea just a short period before - and within a year
Egypt and Israel began discussions on implementing a continuing peace between
the former bitter enemies. The Arab world was appalled.
In 1978 Sadat shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Israeli Prime Minister Menachim
Begin for his courageous initiative but paid dearly for it as well. In 1981 he
was assassinated by a Muslim extremist for exactly the act which most of the
world applauded.
The agreement between Egypt and Israel was negotiated at the American
Presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland with President Jimmy Carter as host
and witnessing signatory. Israel agreed to return the Sinai to Egypt, but an
equally important part of the talks involved the Palestinian problem. Both sides
agreed to negotiate Palestinian autonomy in Gaza and in the West Bank lands.
Sadat was killed, however, before any headway was made on the issue.
But, for the first time since Israeli statehood, Palestinian self-rule was an
issue on the table.
Intifada
A decade after Sadat's historic visit to Jerusalem, the Palestinians were no
further ahead. In fact, it had been 10 years in which the situation appeared to
be getting worse, not better.
By the early 1980s the PLO, which had been driven from Jordan in 1970 after a
brief civil war, was based in Lebanon, on the north of Israel. In 1982, Israel,
in response to PLO missile attacks on Israeli settlements, invaded Lebanon in an
attempt to drive the PLO out. Before the war was over several hundred
Palestinians living in Lebanese camps had been massacred and, though the actual
killing was done by Christian militia members, Israel was in control of the
camps during the murderous event and had permitted the militia to enter.
International condemnation of Israel was small comfort to the Palestinians.
The Arabs in Gaza and the West Bank were still living in poverty, mostly in
squalid camps, and under Israeli rule. To make the situation even worse, Israeli
settlements were being constructed throughout the lands occupied since the 1967
war, the lands on which the Palestinians hoped, demanded, to create their own
state. Increased Soviet Jewish immigration to Israel (sometimes at the rate of
1000 people a day) had made new housing an absolute necessity, and there were
many Israelis who thought of the lands not as "occupied" but as
"retrieved."
In December of 1987, the Palestinians in Gaza, followed immediately by those in
the West Bank, erupted with four decades of anguish and anger. The Intifada, the
spontaneous uprising of a people with nothing to lose, had begun. Israeli
military presence was increased, curfews imposed, the Palestinians answered with
a general strike. Violence became as common as poverty. Rocks and homemade
explosives faced rubber bullets and tear gas. Over the next several years
hundreds of Palestinians were killed and thousands more put into detention
camps. The economy of the areas, always poor, worsened. Construction of Israeli
settlements continued at an ever-advancing rate as immigrants flooded into the
country.
In 1990, the U.S., in response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, formed an
international coalition of 28 countries to force them out. The Gulf War, early
in 1991 achieved that end. In a wave of international fellow feeling that
followed, peace talks were planned to grapple, finally, with the Palestinian
situation. A conference in Madrid, Spain, in October of 1991 included
representatives from Israel, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and the
Palestinians. Both American president George Bush and Soviet president Mikhail
Gorbachev addressed the meeting. The issue was clear even if the solution was
anything but: both Israel and the Palestinians wanted to live in peace in their
own country. Though the Madrid conference settled nothing it had started
something and that was a major victory.
By 1993 Israel and the PLO had met in Washington and signed an agreement that
all parties hoped would end almost half a century of violence and hatred. It had
been worked out beforehand in secret, in Norway. Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin of
Israel and PLO leader Yasser Arafat met and shook hands on the White House lawn,
though it must have been a mixed pleasure for both of them. Gaza, and the West
Bank town of Jericho were to be transferred to Palestinian rule. The agreement
wasn't broad but, to use a word that has so many meanings in the Middle East, it
was historic.
The peace process took a terrible turn when, in November of 1995, the left-wing
Rabin was assassinated by a right-wing Jewish law student who was opposed to
peace talks with the Palestinians. The election, in June, 1996 of right-wing
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the peace situation even more tenuous.
The convoluted history of the agreement regarding the West Bank city of Hebron
gives some insight into how tortuous the process can be.
But a series of talks have followed, most recently at the Wye Plantation in
Maryland with President Clinton presiding and, bit by bit, land on the West Bank
has been returned to the Palestinians. In return Israel wants to stop sleeping
with one eye open as it has for the last fifty years and spending an enormous
amount of its economy on fighting. Unfortunately, half a century of hatred is
not erased by a contract.
After Israel under Netanyahu stalled on implementing the Wye accord, the
election in May 1999 of Ehud Barak breathed new live into the peace process.
Barak's first move was to call for peace with Israel's Arab neighbours, pledging
to carry out the terms of the U.S.-brokered agreement. Then, in March 2000, the
Israeli cabinet voted to withdraw its soldiers from the zone they had occupied
in southern Lebanon for 15 years.
The Problems
The two biggest obstacles remaining to settling the land-for-security issue are
that the two sides loathe and mistrust each other, and that both sides -- like,
say, Canadians -- are made up of people with a range of conflicting needs and
opinions.
Israeli politics remain divided left and right, while in Palestine, Arafat's
leadership has been uneasy for at least twenty years. Hamas, a militant Islamic
group, wants an end to negotiations and a resumption of the Intifada. Israelis
who have settled on the West Bank consider a return of the lands to Palestine a
betrayal of them and of the entire nation. Every time a small step toward
resolution is planned extremists on one side or the other try to commit acts so
heinous as to replace the movement toward settlement with renewed hatred.
A total absence of good will makes every agreement, every word of every
agreement, slippery to handle. The Wye accord, for instance, called for Israeli
release of some Palestinian prisoners along with the return of land. Since the
Israeli purpose in the plan is to achieve peace and security, they don't want to
release from prison Palestinians whom they consider a danger to them. Since the
Palestinian requirement is freedom and self-government, they demanded the
release of those they consider political detainees.
From the Israeli perspective there's nothing worse than giving neighbouring land
to an enemy who then uses it as a base to destroy you. For the Palestinians,
getting back land only to find themselves overrun by Israeli settlements is
barely better than their current situation.
If politics is the art of doing the best you can under the circumstances, then
the negotiators on both sides are trying hard to be rational politicians. But
the conflicting nationalism of two peoples, a life-long memory of loathing and
suspicion, and a list, thousands of names long, of dead and broken relatives,
friends and countrymen, can obscure pragmatism.
BUILDING THE FUTURE
What a difference a few bulldozers can make.
The leaders talk, shake hands, sign documents and sometimes they agree. Then
real life and real emotions get in the way. An Israeli housing project on a
rural hillside in East Jerusalem is a good example. It helped derail a peace
process that had seemed on track just months before.
The land is known to Jews as Har Homa, and to Arabs as Abu Ghnaim. Though news
reports often mention that the plot of land has religious significance for both
Muslims and Jews, archaeologists refer to it mainly as the setting for Christian
monuments on an old road to Bethlehem. Whoever can lay claim to the most symbols
on the site, the real issue is much larger than a plot of new houses on historic
lands. The issue is Jerusalem itself, the sacred city of three religions and the
centre of the most disputed land in a much-disputed country.
The Lure of Jerusalem
Jerusalem is considered among the holiest of cities by Christians, Jews and
Muslims, and it contains many of the most revered locations in all three
traditions.
To Jews, Jerusalem is the central and most emotional place in the religion, home
of Solomon's Temple which was destroyed twenty-seven hundred years ago then
rebuilt. It is the City of David, from which they were driven in 70 AD, when the
Romans destroyed the Temple yet again. Jerusalem is the centre of the Jewish
dream of return. According to Muslim tradition, Jerusalem the third holiest
place in Islam. The Dome of the Rock is there, the place where Mohammed was
elevated to heaven, and also the Mosque of Al Aqsa, one of the religion's most
sacred shrines.
For Christians, Jerusalem is the place where Jesus was crucified and
resurrected. The city contains the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, built over the
traditional tomb of Christ. As well, Palestinian Christians have expressed
concern about the Har Homa development's proximity to Bethlehem, Christ's
birthplace.
In 1947 when the UN drew their partition lines in Palestine, the city of
Jerusalem wasn't part of the deal. Because of its intense importance to three
religions, the UN's plan called for the city to be an international enclave
administered by the UN. However, after armistice was declared in 1949, ending
the Israeli War of Independence, Jerusalem was a divided city, with the new, or
western, section in Israeli hands and the old, or eastern, part annexed by
Jordan. By the end of the Six Day War in 1967, the entire city of Jerusalem was
in Israeli hands. It remains for the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian peace process
to decide its future, both in terms of who controls the city and in terms of who
lives there. It's not a dispute either side will give up on.
The Last Suburb
Har Homa/Abu Ghnaim covers only 2 square kilometres, but the parcel of land is
one of the last rural spots in an area of dense suburban development. It is a
small piece of land that symbolizes the larger struggle for Jerusalem.
In the early 1900s, Arabs farmed the territory known as East Jerusalem and
established some rudimentary buildings on Abu Ghnaim. In the 1930s and '40s,
some of the land was purchased by Jewish businesses. From 1949 until 1967 the
Jordanians were in control.
Since 1967 Israel has initiated a series of settlements in East Jerusalem. The
state has provided financial incentives and encouraged immigrants to Israel to
move to these suburbs. In 1991 Jewish developers who owned some of the rural Har
Homa land asked the Israeli government to expropriate the rest of the land in
preparation for development. Both Israeli and Palestinian land owners appealed,
but to no avail. Har Homa completes a ring of Jewish-owned homes around the old
city. There is a housing shortage for Palestinians in Jerusalem, and fewer
Palestinian housing projects have been approved than Jewish projects.
Palestinians claim that construction of a controversial thoroughfare, called
Road 45, isolates many of their communities in Jerusalem from their neighbors on
the West Bank.
The Diplomatic Crisis
The Israeli population in the East Jerusalem has swelled since 1967. It is
estimated there were 50,000 Israelis in East Jerusalem in 1979. By 1993, there
were 168,000 Israelis and 154,000 Palestinians. Palestinians believe the future
of the city and control of the West Bank will be determined by local politics,
and they believe control of those politics, by virtue of numbers, has shifted to
the Israelis. That's one of the reasons they don't want new construction in the
area.
In the Oslo II peace agreement of 1995, Israel agreed that Palestinians- who are
residents but not citizens in Jerusalem- would have a vote in future elections.
More Israeli citizens means the balance of power shifts in their favour. Jews,
of course, believe this is desirable. Arabs will fight strenuously against it.
So the bulldozers arrive to do their work. To one community they are building a
rightful future. To the other, they are machines of destruction of a homeland.
JORDAN'S KING HUSSEIN
Hussein played major role in peace process
Hussein ibn Talal, whose line stretched back to the prophet Mohammed, ascended
the throne of Jordan at the age of 17.
The Hashemite Dynasty to which he belonged proudly traces their lineage thirteen
hundred years back to the founder of Islam. The dynasty had endured through the
centuries of Turkish Ottoman control of the Mideast, and the Hashemite Prince
Faysal ibn Husayn had fought alongside Colonel T.E. Lawrence during the First
World War to overthrow Ottoman control in the area.
After the war Faysal's brother, Abdullah, became the Hashemite ruler of the
newly formed nation of Trans-Jordan, which, like Palestine, was a British
mandate.
Full independence came to Jordan after World War II and in 1946 Abdullah
proclaimed himself king.
From the beginning of King Hussein's rule in 1953 he perpetually found himself,
like his country, caught between conflicting forces: Israel and the West on one
side, Arabs-- in particular Palestinians-- on the other. And Jordan always
between them.
When the State of Israel was born in May of 1948 on the land that had been
Palestine, the Arab world rose up in immediate attack.
When the fighting was over only Jordan emerged as a significant Arab victor. The
lands on the west bank of the Jordan River that were, according to the UN plan,
meant to form part of the Palestinian portion of the partitioned country ended
up in Jordanian hands.
In 1950 Jordan officially annexed the West Bank. Israel and Britain quietly
agreed to King Abdullah keeping the area, but the Arab countries objected
loudly, and the new arrangement was recognized by only two countries: Britain
and Pakistan.
In part it was Jordan's affiliation with the West that was responsible for its
victories in the Israeli War of Independence.
The Arab Legion, formed in Trans-Jordan in the 20s under British influence, and
taken over in 1939 by Sir John Bagot Glubb (a.k.a. Glubb Pasha), was the most
effective military force in the Arab world. But Jordan's annexing of the West
Bank, though it nominally expanded the Hashemite Kingdom, provided few benefits
for Hussein.
The Palestinians were not supporters of the Hashemite Dynasty and an increase in
Palestinian population could only be seen as a threat to Hussein's control. As
well, the West Bank lands were at the centre of Palestinian hopes for their own
homeland.
Because Jordan is not a nation rich in resources, Hussein knew that satisfying
foreign interests in return for economic support was an absolute necessity. The
West has been an enormous source of support for Jordan.
On the other hand-- there was always the other hand for Hussein-- the Arab world
demanded Jordan's allegiance. After the armistice ending the Israeli War of
Independence, Jordan's control of the West Bank was accepted by Israel and
relations between the two countries were tolerable, though intermittent acts of
violence on both sides kept tensions always near the surface.
Jordan retained its claims over the West Bank lands even after Israel occupied
them during the Six Day War in 1967.
Jordan didn't finally relinquish its claims until 1988. But whatever Jordan's
relationship to the West Bank, their histories were intertwined and Hussein was
never far from whatever battlefield, military or political, was at the centre of
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
During the 50s, Hussein bowed to nationalism and Arab pressure by purging
Western advisors and removing Glubb as head of the Arab Legion.
He was also talked out of joining in a Western defence arrangement called the
Baghdad Pact even though he had been instrumental in initiating it. But an
attempted coup d'etat in 1957 by members of the National Guard, many of them
Palestinians from the West Bank, caused Hussein to act decisively against the
Palestinian nationalists in his legislature. Caught in the middle of too many
conflicting demands, he banned political parties and set up a dictatorship.
When the Iraqi branch of the Hashemite Dynasty was killed in a coup in 1958--
engineered by Egypt-- Hussein turned to the West for protection.
With the financial and military aid of the U.S. and Britain, Hussein resisted
the anti-Hashemite forces-- largely Palestinians supported by Egypt-- and hung
on to power.
His next crisis was the rise of the Palestine Liberation Organization in the
1960s. This new force in Palestinian affairs threatened Jordan's sovereignty on
the West Bank and caused the Israelis to respond to PLO raids, many launched
from Jordan, with violence of their own. It was Israel's hope to force Jordan to
stop the PLO. Relations between Jordan and the Palestinians worsened.
Hussein, understanding the potential for violence and political disintegration,
attempted to quiet the situation by stopping guerilla use of his country and, in
the process, he strained relations with both Syria and Egypt. But as tensions
boiled ever higher, he joined with Egypt and Syria in 1967, putting Jordanian
military forces under Egyptian command.
In the Six Day War in June of 1967, Israel occupied the West Bank, pushing
Jordan back to the east side of the Jordan River. Jordan not only suffered heavy
casualties but also lost much of its best farmland and, as well, had to cope
with hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees who fled the Israeli-occupied
West Bank.
Hussein had gambled and, though he lost, he may have lost less than he otherwise
might have. His reasoning was that if he didn't support Egypt and Syria, they in
turn might well have supported a Palestinian coup in Jordan. He lost the West
Bank but he kept his kingdom.
The post-Six Day War period provided several major problems for Hussein. The
increase in Palestinian population in Jordan--angrier than ever at their
situation-- threatened his Hashemite throne. The losses in the war had been
crippling. And Israel now occupied the West Bank.
Ever the pragmatist, Hussein kept up negotiations with Israel but out of sight
of the Arab world. He refused to sign a peace treaty with Israel and their
relationship subsisted as neither friends nor enemies.
The PLO, under the chairmanship of Yasser Arafat was a constant challenge to
Hussein's power.
In September 1970, PLO guerrillas hijacked several airliners and blew them up on
a landing strip in Jordan. Later that month, civil war erupted in Jordan and
Hussein was forced to ask for Western help in combating the threat, which
included several hundred Syrian tanks sent to aid the PLO.
By the next year the PLO had been forced from Jordan. When Egypt and Syria
attacked Israel in 1973 (the Yom Kippur War), Hussein kept out as much as
possible though he sent tanks to help Syria. When the war was over Hussein
demanded the return of the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Israel but with no
success.
By August 1974, however, Jordan and Israel were discussing a new proposal that
would see Jordan representing the Palestinians. Arab leaders disagreed and with
a largely unified voice the Arab world proclaimed the PLO as the only official
representatives of the Palestinian people. Their objective was a Palestinian
State. Hussein recognized that a federation between Jordan and a Palestinian
state would give the Palestinian population a majority and he declared that he
would never agree to such an idea.
In the late 70s Hussein, meeting with American President Jimmy Carter, and
Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, discussed the issue of a Jordan-Palestine link
but this time it was Arafat, speaking for the Palestinians, who demurred.
Relations between Jordan and Israel soured with the election of Menachem Begin
as Israeli Prime Minister in May 1977. Begin clearly was in favour of keeping
all of the West Bank. He sped up construction of Jewish settlements in the land
still claimed by both Jordan and the Palestinians.
Hussein put an end to 15 years of secret negotiations with Israel and for
several years, until 1984, Jordan and Israel stopped talking. In the early 1980s
Hussein tried to settle with Arafat and the PLO, whose bases in Lebanon had been
destroyed by Israel. Hussein needed the Palestinian situation resolved if Jordan
was to achieve either peace or prosperity. He also needed to end the continuing
threat to his Hashemite throne.
Hussein let the Palestine National Council meet in Amman, and in 1985 he agreed
to aid the PLO in coordinating a joint peace initiative. Hussein wanted a
confederation of the West and East Banks with autonomy for the Palestinians but
under Jordanian rule. Arafat was happy to agree to confederation between a
future Palestinian state and Jordan, but his vision included independence for
the West Bank.
In February 1986 talks between Hussein and Arafat broke down. Hussein needed
assurances from Arafat that he would renounce violence and recognize Israel but
such an undertaking was never given. Hussein declared that Jordan would be
responsible for the economic welfare of the West Bank Palestinians and, as well,
he raised the number of Palestinian seats in the National Assembly.
If he could squeeze out the PLO and reach some accord with Israel, he hoped, he
might still hang on to some of the disputed land.
In April 1987 Hussein and Shimon Peres, Israel's foreign minister, agreed to a
UN-sponsored conference that would include Palestinian representatives as part
of a Jordanian-Palestinian delegation. In spite of American assent to the plan,
Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Shamir refused, wanting the conference to include
only Jordan.
Hussein's stature rose with the 1987 Arab League summit meeting in Amman though,
interestingly, the Palestinian issue wasn't the main topic of discussion. The
Iran-Iraq War, already eight years old, took the floor.
In December of 1987 the Intifada, the Palestinian uprising on the West Bank and
in Gaza, changed the entire situation for Jordan. Hussein supported the Intifada
publicly and offered aid in an attempt to keep, or regain, Palestinian
confidence.
Hussein's attempts at being seen as a friend of the Palestinians were rejected
as Arafat became the spokesman for the Palestinians.
Any hopes of a Jordanian-Israeli resolution to the Palestine problem were
effectively ended and Hussein renounced all claims to the West Bank. He
dissolved the Jordanian parliament, half of whom were West Bank representatives,
and stopped paying salaries to over 20,000 West Bank civil servants. When the
Palestine National Council recognized the PLO as the sole legal representative
of the Palestinians, Hussein immediately gave them official recognition.
With Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990 and the subsequent Gulf War, Hussein was
again stuck between two worlds, able to please only one. Hussein favoured Iraq
over the US. Saddam Hussein of Iraq was an Arab who was widely supported within
Jordan. As well, Iraq was one of Jordan's major trading partners. Jordan
suffered condemnation and blockades. With the end of the war, however, all was
forgiven as Jordan was again solicited to support a peace initiative in the
perpetually troubled area.
With the Gulf War behind them, all the parties involved in the mid-east stepped
up attempts to reach a solution to the Palestinian situation, at that point
almost half a century old. King Hussein of Jordan, whose land and life had both
been in the centre of the controversy for so long, clearly had as much interest
in a settlement as the principals themselves.
In 1991 a conference was convened in Madrid, with Jordan as a major player, at
which the PLO and Israel were both in attendance and first steps toward
resolution were taken. Israel and the PLO went on to arrange a secret peace plan
in Oslo in 1993 and Hussein signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1994.
In 1997 when President Clinton needed some prestigious heft to break the
deadlock at the Wye Plantation talks, he invited King Hussein, in the US for
treatment of the cancer that finally took his life, to attend. Though the
agreement hashed out at Wye has followed the usual, complex course of
mid-eastern affairs, Hussein's input at the conference helped to sway the
participants to at least begin to agree.
Hussein was King of Jordan for over 45 years and in that time was plagued by a
single problem that overshadowed every other in his political life. He did not
live to see its resolution though he will be remembered as one whose efforts
helped his neighbours, the Israelis and the Palestinians, to live in the peace
that eluded him most of his life. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/middleeast/questforpeace.html
(links to more info)
http://www.mideastweb.org/timeline.htm
excellent concise and detailed middle east historical timeline
The Temple: The
crowning achievement of King
Solomon's reign was the erection of a magnificent Temple (Beit ha-Midkash)
in Jerusalem.
His father, King
David, had wanted to build a great Temple for God a generation earlier, as a
permanent resting place for the Ark
containing the Ten
Commandments. A divine edict, however, had forbidden him from doing so.
"You will not build a house for My name," God said to him, "for
you are a man of battles and have shed blood" (I
Chronicles 28:3). The Bible's description of Solomon's Temple suggests that
the inside ceiling was was 180 feet long, 90 feet wide, and 50 feet high. The
highest point on the Temple that King Solomon built was actually 120 cubits tall
(about 20 stories or about 207 feet). He spares no expense in the building's
creation. He orders vast quantities of cedar from King Hiram of Tyre (I
Kings 5:2025), has huge blocks of the choicest stone quarried, and
commands that the building's foundation be laid with hewn stone. To complete the
massive project, he imposes forced labor on all his subjects, drafting people
for work shifts lasting a month at a time. Some 3,300 officials are appointed to
oversee the Temple's erection (5:2730).
Solomon assumes such heavy debts in building the Temple that he is forced to pay
off King Hiram with twenty towns in the Galilee (I
Kings 9:11). When the Temple is completed, Solomon inaugurates it with
prayer and sacrifice,
and even invites nonJews to come and pray there. He urges God to pay
particular heed to their prayers: "Thus all the peoples of the earth will
know Your name and revere You, as does Your people Israel; and they will
recognize that Your name is attached to this House that I have built" (I
Kings 8:43). Until the Temple was
destroyed by the Babylonians
some four hundred years later, in 586 B.C.E.,
sacrifice
was the predominant mode of divine service there. Seventy years later, a second
Temple was built on the same site, and sacrifices
again resumed. During the first century B.C.E., Herod greatly enlarged and
expanded this Temple. The Second Temple
was destroyed by the Romans
in 70 C.E., after the failure of the Great
Revolt. During the centuries
the Muslims
controlled Palestine, two mosques
were built on the site of the
Jewish Temple. (This was no coincidence; it is a common
Islamic custom to build mosques on the sites
of other people's holy places.) Since any attempt to level these mosques would
lead to an international Muslim holy war (jihad) against Israel, the Temple
cannot be rebuilt in the foreseeable future.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/The_Temple.html
JERUSALEM (3/31/05, AP) - Israel's Supreme Court
agreed Thursday to recognize non-Orthodox
conversions to Judaism that are at least partly performed in Israel,
giving a limited victory to the Reform and Conservative Jewish movements, which
had been marginalized by the religious establishment here. Under current
practice, Israel recognizes only those conversions performed by Orthodox rabbis
inside Israel, although people converted by non-Orthodox rabbis outside the
country are eligible for citizenship under Israel's "Law of Return."
The court ruled on a case brought in 1999 by 17 foreigners who studied for
Reform or Conservative conversions in Israel but had the ceremonies performed
abroad in an attempt to get around the limitations. Israeli authorities objected
to their conversions, saying the Law of Return does not apply to foreigners
already living in Israel. The ruling Thursday accepted the conversions, granting
legal recognition to those who study for conversions in Israel but go through
the actual conversion process abroad. The court did not rule on whether those
who complete their conversions in Israel would be recognized as Jews. "This
is a great ruling. On one hand, all the petitioners received the status of new
immigrants, a status they have been waiting for over more than eight
years," Nicole Maor, a lawyer for the petitioners, told Israel Radio.
"Secondly, while this is limited to overseas conversions, the court ruled
emphatically that the government could not create a monopoly on conversions
here. If the they want a monopoly for Orthodox conversions, they have to
legislate it." The conversion battle cuts to the heart of the identity of
the Jewish state and was being watched by Jews outside Israel, where the Reform
and Conservative movements are more widely accepted than they are here. The
Reform and Conservative movements are the two largest streams of Judaism in the
United States, but they have been largely sidelined in Israel. The dominant
Orthodox establishment has a virtual monopoly over issues such as marriage,
divorce, and burial, as well as sizable budgets from the government for schools
and other programs.
JERUSALEM (4/6/05, AP) - Israel's
Arabs will make up 25% of the country's population by the year 2025,
according to a projection published Wednesday by the government's Central Bureau
of Statistics. The survey predicts that the overall population will rise over
the next 20 years to just over 9.2 million from its present 6.6 million, of
which 2.3 million will be Arabs and 6.5 million will be Jews. About 435,000
people will be from other groups, the projection says. Israeli Arabs currently
make up about 19 percent of the population. The report, covering population
growth only inside Israel's pre-1967 frontiers, assumes an average annual growth
of 2.7 percent in the Arab population and 1.1 percent for the Jewish community.
The Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics estimates the current population of
the West Bank and Gaza Strip at about 4.0 million. Israeli demographers have
said Arabs will outnumber Jews between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean
Sea in the coming decades.
Thomas Sowell notes that Jews are not the only
minority hated for economic success. Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, overseas
Indians and Chinese, Lebanese in Africa, have served as middlemen minorities,
intermediaries between producers and consumers, as retailers or lenders.
Typically, they start with little capital, put the whole family to work, and
eventually prosper. They then are resented by the society that they have done so
much to facilitate. This accounts for much historic anti-Semitism.
(OCR, 6/5/05, Commentary 4)

Creation of Israel
In 1947, the British, who had the
Mandate over Palestine, decided that they had enough of the decades of fighting
and slaughter between Arabs and Jews. They washed their hands of the Mandate and
turned it over to the United Nations.
A solution not accepted. Wishing to end the bloodshed and to
create a stable and, hopefully, permanent solution to the decades of conflict,
the U.N. decreed a partition of the country west of the Jordan River into an
Arab and a Jewish state. In deference to Arab Muslim insistence that it was
their “third holiest city,” the city of Jerusalem, the focus of all Jewish
aspirations for two millennia, was to be “internationalized.” For the Jews
this was bitterly disappointing. Still, in order to create their dreamed-of
state, to normalize the lives of the Jewish inhabitants, and to make possible
the ingathering of the Holocaust survivors, they accepted the partition plan.
They declared their state, Eretz Yisrael – the Land of Israel – and became a
nation. Forever to his credit, US President Harry Truman recognized the nascent
state of Israel within minutes of its declaration of independence.
The Arabs rejected the partition proposal out of hand.
Instead, six Arab armies invaded the country from all sides. They vowed to wage
a war of extermination. The Jewish population of only 650,000 people was lightly
armed and almost hopelessly outnumbered. But in an almost Biblical miracle, the
ragtag Jewish forces defeated the combined Arab might. They suffered horrendous
casualties – about 1 per cent of the population. It was as if the United
States were to lose 3 million people in a conflict. The Arabs also suffered
greatly. Goaded mostly by their leaders to make room for the invading armies,
about 650,000 fled the fighting. They were not accepted by their Arab brethren.
They were interned and live to this day in so-called refugee camps, slum cities,
in which they lead miserable and totally unproductive lives, dependent on the
dole of the world. They are consumed with hatred against the Jews who, they
believe, have deprived them of their patrimony.
At the end of Israel’s War of Liberation, Jordan remained
in possession of Judea and Samaria (which were renamed “The West Bank”) and
the eastern part of Jerusalem. Egypt remained in control of the densely
populated Gaza Strip.
Prosperity despite unending attacks. But Israel was not
allowed to live in peace. Virtually without interruption, it was victimized by
attacks from Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Egypt. There were two major wars: the
Six Day War of 1967 and the Yom Kippur War of 1973. Israel prevailed in both. It
acquired major territories, most of which, in its never-ending quest for peace,
it returned. Following these unsuccessful wars, the Palestinians subjected
Israel to almost uninterrupted “intifadas,” essentially one-sided civil
wars, in which suicide bombings and other assorted terrors were the main
weapons.
Despite these unending tribulations and absorbing close to 4
million migrants from all parts of the world, Israel prospered mightily. Its
population is now close to 8 million. Over 1 million of them are Arabs. They are
Israeli citizens, have all the rights of their fellow Jewish citizens, serve in
the Knesset (Israel’s parliament) and in the diplomatic corps. They are full
participants in the economic prosperity that permeates Israel. Israel’s
product per person is on the same or higher order as that of most European
countries. It is a center of science and of culture. Its industrial output
encompasses some of the most advanced technology and sophisticated production in
the world. Next to Canada, Israel is the most represented country on US stock
exchanges. Most major high-tech companies have facilities – factories and
research establishments – in Israel.
All of this is admirable, of course. But there is a flip side
to this edifying story. That is the fate of the Arab descendants of those who
fled Israel in the 1948 War of Liberation. Had they followed the example of the
Jews and agreed to the partition decreed by the U.N., they could today be in the
same advanced position as Israel, instead of the misery in which they live.
Because there is no question that Israel would have been more than willing to
enter into a federation with Palestine, in which citizens of both countries
could peacefully partake in common prosperity. Can that dream still come true?
Of course it can! Israel has accepted virtually all of the “conditions” for
reconciliation on which the Palestinians have insisted, with the sole exception
of the demand for the “right of return.” That “right” would swamp Israel
with hundreds of thousands or even millions of Arabs. The country could not
absorb them and it would with one stroke be the end of Israel as the Jewish
state. Even for the thorny question of Jerusalem a compromise could be found.
But, having been misled by the thuggish Arafat for decades, Arab Palestine needs
a wise leader in order to finally make peace with Israel. Arab children could
study at Israel’s splendid universities and technical schools, instead of
learning the “science” of martyrdom and the “skills” of suicide bombing.
Then the dream could finally be fulfilled and peace and prosperity could be
extended over all of the Promised Land. Milk and Honey could indeed flow
http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_112.html

DON'T LOOK NOW, BUT THE MIDDLE East's old diplomatic game of make-believe is back. The peace process is hopelessly deadlocked, but the key players pretend otherwise, hoping that wishing will make it so. There's an old saying in the sands of Araby: "If you can't manage to get control of the camel, at least get control of its saddle." Israel has control of neither.
What everyone knows but doesn't like to admit is that the Palestinian Authority and its leader, Mahmoud
Abbas, have, once and for all, given in to the
gunmen. Abbas pledged to establish "one authority, one law, and one gun." He has failed on all counts. When radicals threatened to break the cease-fire several weeks ago, he caved, freeing nine of their jailed gunmen. He caved again when the radicals threatened to kill Fatah supporters unless he released another terrorist who had been firing rockets in Gaza. When Israel gave the Palestinian Authority the names of militants involved in a February suicide bombing in a Tel Aviv nightclub, he caved yet again, arresting several, then releasing them. Instead of living up to his promise to keep tabs on a "Most Wanted" list of 495 terrorists, he tried to slip many of them in as employees of the Palestinian security forces, to legitimize and launder their possessions of arms so they could attack again. When Israel provided the names of weapon smugglers, Abbas's security chiefs tipped them off that the Israelis were on their trail.
Now you have armed gangs playing pretend
democracy. Gunmen of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades run Jenin. In Ramallah, dozens of wanted men, joined by 80 members of the presidential guard, opened fire in the courtyard of Palestinian Authority headquarters. In Tulkarm, another gang opened fire on the Palestinian governor's building. In Gaza, Hamas still fires scores of rockets and mortar shells at Israeli homes while Islamic Jihad defies the agreement for a "calm," saying, "We joined the tahdiya [calm] to give the combatants rest. . . . As far as we are concerned, the
intifada has not ended; it is still going on."
What is also still going on is the incitement of
hatred. In print and on broadcast media controlled by the Palestinian Authority--and subsidized by Europe and the United States--Israelis and Jews continue to be demonized, their murders blatantly encouraged. Palestinian kids are still taught that the greatest glory is dying for Allah in battle as jihadists. They save terrorist cards the way American kids save baseball cards.
What is Israel to do? It's amazing that Israelis have kept their patience for this long in the face of such betrayals. It would have been a dereliction of Israel's duty to its citizens not to respond as it has--retaining control of land, sea, and air access to Gaza; resuming arrests and the targeted killings of Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorist leaders; and tightening security all around. The Palestinians have only themselves to blame for the fact that Israel is now slowing the withdrawal program and has delayed transferring more West Bank cities to Palestinian control.
Victimhood. The Palestinian Authority is in disarray and decline. Abbas ducked elections in Gaza that were scheduled for July 17. Hamas opposes a negotiated peace with Israel, but it is filling the void left by the PA. It provides health and education services, exploiting popular revulsion over the PA's corruption in siphoning off vast amounts of the aid donated to the Palestinian people by the international community.Abbas's strategy has been to present himself as a victim. His desire is that this will take the heat off him to confront terrorism, in the hope that the international community will force Israel to make still more concessions to help him out. But Israelis rightly ask: What's the point of strengthening a leader whose popularity is plummeting, who cannot or will not exert control over terrorists, and who has proved incapable of carrying out his promises?Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is determined to proceed with the disengagement despite the fact that the postponement of the Gaza election means Israel does not know the full extent of Hamas's political strength there, leaving open the risk that it may be transferring territory to enemies who will seek to destroy Israel.The sad fact is that everything is going wrong.
Terrorist groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad are using the relative calm to rearm and regroup for the next
intifada. They smuggle longer-range missiles through dirt tunnels between Egypt and Gaza, for use after disengagement against Israelis now across the
fence. Sharon has taken a huge gamble with the Gaza withdrawal. But instead of playing weak, Sharon plays strong, determined to complete the disengagement. How sad that there is no comparable leader on the other side, someone with a vision of what a Palestinian state might be and with the courage to save the Palestinian Authority from being a fig leaf for an increasingly anarchic terrorist state.
(USN&WR, 8/15/05, 72)

DAYTON, Ohio (AP, 2/24/06) - Ohio Farmers Seeking
Israel's
Expertise. Farmers in Israel raise crops in conditions that couldn't
be more foreign to their Ohio counterparts. But the arid soils, limited
water and cramped spaces have turned Israeli farmers into experts at making
crops bloom in the desert. A group of Ohio farmers hopes to use that
expertise to improve productivity. A 29-person delegation is leaving Sunday
for a 10-day trip to Israel to learn everything from water management to
milk processing to handling urban expansion. "I'm extremely intrigued
by the ability of them to grow enough crops for 7 million people in the
desert," said Daniel Corcoran, 42, who raises soybeans, wheat and
alfalfa on his 4,000-acre family farm near Waverly in southern Ohio.
"Hopefully, there are things we can bring back here." Israel is
one of the most densely populated countries in the world. Only about 20
percent of the land can be farmed and half of that has to be irrigated. But
Israel not only produces most of its own food, it also has enough to export.
Fruit, vegetables and fertilizer are among the most successful exports.
Israeli farms have prospered by irrigating crops, seeding clouds to increase
rainfall, landscaping to redirect floodwaters toward crops and using drip
irrigation so that crops receive the precise amount of water and fertilizer.
The Israelis have also developed computer-controlled greenhouses that have
curtains, skylights and netting to control sunlight and temperature. The
trip is being hosted by the Ohio Department of Agriculture and the
Cleveland-based Negev Foundation, a group whose mission is to develop
agriculture in the southern, largely desert portion of Israel. The journey
is part of a larger initiative to help Israelis benefit from business
opportunities in Ohio and from sharing ideas with Ohio agricultural
researchers. Last fall, Israeli farmers promoted their products at the Farm
Science Review in London, Ohio. Ram Ben-Dor, 52, lived on an Israeli farm
for 20 years, raising poultry and fruit. He said the Ohio farmers should be
able to help Israelis with technologies that would increase their
productivity and make them more competitive in world markets. He said it
would be an opportunity to make contacts that could increase soybean imports
from Ohio. Sam Hoenig, foundation president, said Israeli farmers are also
interested in Ohio's expertise on turf as they seek to develop recreational
areas. Among those going on the trip are several Ohio fish farmers. John
Bechtel raises trout, perch and bluegill near Fredericktown in central Ohio.
He is most interested in how the Israelis prevent the spread of disease
among fish. He also wants to tap into their knowledge about fish nutrition,
genetics and water-quality management. "They use water over and over
again," Bechtel said. "That is the future of fish farming."
Bob Peterson raises hogs and grows corn, soybeans and wheat on his farm in
central Ohio. But residential and commercial development from Columbus,
Cincinnati and Dayton keeps creeping in. He hopes to see how Israeli farmers
manage to work in densely populated areas while increasing production and
profits. "I'm curious how they've handled that," said Peterson,
43. "How do they do that much agriculture surrounded by
people?"

Israel's population stands at 7,282,000
JERUSALEM POST, May 7, 2008 8:57
On the eve of Israel's 60th Independence Day, the country's population
stands at 7,282,000, according to figures released by the Central Bureau of
Statistics (CBS),
18,000 new immigrants have arrived in Israel since last
Independence Day. Some 5,499,000 of the population (75.5 percent) are Jews, 1,461,000
(20.1%) are Arabs and the remaining 322,000 (4.4%) are immigrants and their
offspring who are not registered as Jews by the Interior Ministry. According to the CBS statistics, since last Independence Day, the
country's population has risen by some 130,000, with most of this increase
being attributed to natural growth. 156,400 new babies have been born and
some 18,000 new immigrants have arrived. When the state was established, there were only 806,000 residents, with
this number reaching its first and second million in 1949 and 1958
respectively. In 1990, Israel's population hit five million and in 1998, after the wave
of immigration from the former Soviet Union, it numbered six million. According to the CBS forecast, the population is expected to reach 10
million by 2030.
Jews were driven out of Arab lands in roughly the same number as Arabs who
fled Israel at the time of the creation of the Jewish state. The difference was
the Jews were absorbed into the new state, given jobs and citizenship, while the
Palestinians were largely confined to squalid camps in order for their unwilling
Arab hosts to exploit them as political pawns to use against Israel. ( JERUSALEM POST, May
12, 2008)
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1209627059753&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

1967
BORDERS, 06/03/2011
In 1967, Syria occupied the Golan Heights and were
regularly firing artillery shells into Israel. Egyptian troops were moving
into the Sinai and massing near the Israeli border. Egyptian President
Nasser ordered the UN Emergency Force (UNEF), stationed to protect
Israel’s borders to withdraw and they promptly withdrew. Nasser
proclaimed, "Our basic objective will be the destruction
of Israel.”
Unbelievably,
President Lyndon Johnson imposed an arms embargo on weapon shipments to
Israel; while Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, Algeria and Saudi Arabia were rushing
arms and equipment or troops to Egypt and Syria.
On June 5, 1967, Israel
struck back.
The entire Israeli Air Force, with the exception of
just 12 fighters assigned to defend Israeli air space, took off at 7:14
a.m. to bomb Egyptian airfields while the Egyptian pilots were eating
breakfast (The story I heard while working at a defense company was that
Israeli Intelligence learned that Egypt’s air defense radars would be
shut down for regularly scheduled maintenance at 7 a.m. that day).
In less than two hours, roughly 300 Egyptian aircraft
were destroyed. A few hours later, Israeli fighters attacked the Jordanian
and Syrian air forces, as well as an airfield in Iraq.
By the end of the first day, nearly the entire Egyptian
and Jordanian air forces, and half the Syrians’ had been destroyed on
the ground. The battle then moved to the ground, and some of history’s
greatest tank battles were fought between Egyptian and Israeli armor in
the Sinai desert.
The war was over in six
days and Israel conquered enough territory to more than triple the
size of the area it controlled from 8,000 to 26,000 square miles.
The victory enabled Israel to unify Jerusalem. Israeli
forces had also captured the Sinai, Golan Heights, Gaza Strip and the West
Bank.
The war was
costly for Israel.
In six days they lost twice as many men in proportion
to their population as the U.S. lost in eight years of fighting in
Vietnam.
The Arabs
didn’t give up, and in 1973 they launched a Pearl Harbor like
sneak attack on the eve of Yom Kippur, the holiest day on the Jewish
religious calendar. This war caught Israel completely by surprise.
It took several weeks to turn the tide and Israel
gained a little more land on the Golan Heights.
When I visited Israel in 1988, burned out tank hulks
lining the roads was a constant reminder of their battles to defend their
country.
Asking Israel to go back to the pre-war 1967 borders is
shear lunacy.
http://www.morgancountycitizen.com/?q=node/17598

THE JEWS TOOK
NOBODY'S LAND
by Joseph Farrah, (Nov 19, 2002, WorldNet Daily)
- As the most visible Arab-American critic of Yasser Arafat and the phony
"Palestinian" agenda, I get a lot of hate mail. I've even received
more than my share of death threats. Most of those who attack me - at least
those who bother to get beyond the four-letter words and insults - say I just
don't understand or have sympathy for these poor Arabs who were displaced,
chased out of their homes and turned into refugees by the Israelis. Let me state
this plainly and clearly: The Jews in Israel took no one's land.
WHEN MARK TWAIN visited the Holy Land in the 19th century, he was
greatly disappointed. He didn't see any people. He referred to it as a vast
wasteland. The land we now know as Israel was practically deserted. By the
beginning of the 20th century, that began to change. Jews from all over the
world began to return to their ancestral homeland - the Promised Land Moses and
Joshua had conquered millennia earlier, historians and Jews believe, on the
direct orders of God. That's not to say there wasn't always a strong Jewish
presence in the land - particularly in and around Jerusalem. In 1854, according
to a report in the New York Tribune, Jews constituted two-thirds of the
population of that holy city. The source for that statistic? A journalist on
assignment in the Middle East that year for the Tribune. His name was Karl Marx.
Yes, that Karl Marx.
A travel guide to Palestine and Syria, published in 1906 by Karl
Baedeker, illustrates the fact that, even when the Islamic Ottoman Empire ruled
the region, the Muslim population in Jerusalem was minimal. The book estimates
the total population of the city at 60,000, of whom 7,000 were Muslims, 13,000
were Christians and 40,000 were Jews. "The number of Jews has greatly risen
in the last few decades, in spite of the fact that they are forbidden to
immigrate or to possess landed property," the book states. Even though the
Jews were persecuted, still they came to Jerusalem and Represented the
overwhelming majority of the population as early as 1906. And even though
Muslims today claim Jerusalem as the third holiest site in Islam, when the city
was under Islamic rule, they had little interest in it.
As the Jews came, drained the swamps and made the deserts bloom,
something interesting began to happen. Arabs followed. I don't blame them. They
had good reason to come. They came for jobs. They came for prosperity. They came
for freedom. And they came in large numbers. Winston Churchill observed in 1939:
"So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and
multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry
could lift up the Jewish population." Then came 1948 and the great
partition. The United Nations proposed the creation of two states in the region
- one Jewish, one Arab. The Jews accepted it gratefully. The Arabs rejected it
with a vengeance and declared war. Arab leaders urged Arabs to leave the area so
they would not be caught in the crossfire. They could return to their homes,
they were told, after Israel was crushed and the Jews destroyed. It didn't work
out that way. By most counts, several hundred thousand Arabs were displaced by
this war - not by Israeli aggression, not by some Jewish real-estate grab, not
by Israeli expansionism. In fact, there are many historical records showing the
Jews urged the Arabs to stay and live with them in peace. But, tragically, they
chose to leave.
FIFTY-FOUR YEARS LATER, the sons and daughters and grandsons and
granddaughters of those refugees are all-too-often still living in refugee camps
- not because of Israeli intransigence, but because they are misused as a
political tool of the Arab powers. Those poor unfortunates could be settled in a
week by the rich Arab oil states that control 99.9 percent of the Middle East
land mass, but they are kept as virtual prisoners, filled with misplaced hatred
for Jews and armed as suicide martyrs by the Arab power brokers. This is the
modern real history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. At no time did the Jews uproot
Arab families from their homes. When there were title deeds to be purchased,
they bought them at inflated prices. When there were not, they worked the land
so they could have a place to live without the persecution they faced throughout
the world. It's a great big lie that the Israelis displaced anyone - one of a
series of lies and myths that have the world on the verge of committing yet
another great injustice to the Jews.
ADDENDUM:
After 1948, the land of Arabs who left the territory of Israel was assigned to
an administrator of absentee lands, and under Israeli law the absentee Arabs
could return and reclaim their land. Thousands of them did so (the figures I
have seen are over 15,000). As to those absentee Arab land owners who refused to
deal with Israel, their land was taken by eminent domain (called
"compulsory purchase" in British law, or "expropriation" in
European civil law), and they were paid fair market value plus interest. This is
a story that for some reason has not received any publicity, an act of
informational neglect that from the point of view of hasbara is positively
criminal. This story should be told. Don't take my word for any of this. Check
it out with your Israeli sources. I believe that the Office of Administrator of
Absentee Property still exists in Israel. Gideon Kanner, Professor of Law
Emeritus, Loyola Law School
http://www.windowview.org/NEWS/2005/Q1/news.021905.bk.htm

Shows Middle East historic empires. Whose land is it now, first occupiers,
later occupiers, or last occupiers?
Fast interesting link below.
http://www.mapsofwar.com/images/EMPIRE17.swf

Israel's Arab
Settlements
[rightsidenews.com, 1/6/10]
|
While
the media and politicians wail over Israeli settlements and revisionist
historians pen narratives in which Israel's entire history comes
down to a plot to seize Arab land (following in the footsteps of how
their American counterparts have reinterpreted US history)... very
little is said of Israel's Arab settlements.
But
Arab settlements in Israel far
outweigh Jewish ones and have far less legitimate roots. Consider
East Jerusalem, which Obama and the EU are insisting should be reserved
for Arab residency alone. East Jerusalem
does indeed have a solid Arab majority because in 1948 the armies of
seven Arab nations invaded Israel and occupied half of Jerusalem,
dividing it as their Soviet allies divided Berlin, and ethnically
cleansed its Jewish population. Jewish
places of worship in East Jerusalem were bombed or turned into mosques
and toilets, even the dead were not allowed to rest in peace as
their tombstones were used to pave roads. Jewish homes were seized by
Arabs and East Jerusalem became wholly Arab.
This
is the situation that Obama and the EU are fighting to perpetuate by
banning any Jewish housing in the eastern half of the now united
Jerusalem. This is what every government that refuses to recognize
Jerusalem as Israel's capital is legitimizing by rewarding
the ethnic cleansing practiced by the Jordanian Legion and the Holy War
Army (Jaysh al-Jihad al-Muqaddas) of the nephew of Nazi
collaborating Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Mohammad al-Husayni.
And
then there are the so-called Israeli settlements of Gaza, Judea and
Samaria-- which indeed were built on territory that Israel captured from
Egypt and Jordan in 1967, after Egypt
and Jordan had captured the territory in 1948, destroying Jewish
villages on the territory in the process. Some Jewish villages
like Kfar Darom suffered the fate of being destroyed twice over, once by
the Arab occupation armies in 1948, to be reestablished and again
destroyed by Fatah's terrorist militias after Israel agreed to
ethnically cleanse its own population from Gaza to appease Arab
terrorism.
That
is the truth behind the so-called Israeli Settlements issue, but it is
not by any means the whole truth. Because the UN, the EU and the State
Department have only applied the term "settlements" to Jewish
towns and villages, never Arab ones, regardless of their legality. This
double standard that is defined purely by ethnicity and religion, and by
no other factor whatsoever, represents the real international Apartheid
that targets Jews for ethnic cleansing to the benefit of Arab Muslims.
That
means that the Arab Muslim seizure of land for the creation of
settlements has been mostly unregulated and is widespread. Not only that
it's often aided and abetted by foreign activists who regularly come to
"help" Arab villagers
harvest olives. In reality this is often a charade in which those same
villagers have marked the territory by planting
on the land of Jewish villages nearby, resulting in calculated
clashes that are broken up by soldiers and police, and filmed by the
same activists resulting in international condemnations. To avoid those
condemnations, Israel eventually seizes the land from the Jewish farmers
and turns it over to the Arab villagers. This only sets the stage for
the next stage of the clashes, recreating in a microcosm the entire
"peace process", in which terrorism results in concessions,
which results in more terrorism and more concessions, creating the cycle
of appeasement and terrorism that has bedeviled Israel and most of the
First World when dealing with Islam.
Those
same left wing activists, most notably groups such as Peace Now and
Rabbis for Human Rights, go on to destroy and damage the land of Jewish
farmers. When the farmers attempt to defend their land, the activists
videotape the resulting encounter and the farmers are arrested. At which
point the land can be easily seized while its owners are tied up by the
legal system. Attempting to reestablish ownership then becomes next to
impossible in a political system constantly afraid of international
condemnation and in a legal system controlled by the Anti-Israel left
all the way up to the Supreme Court, which actually refused to seat a
Justice for being too conservative.
And
in the process Arab settlements continue to expand on land that they
casually appropriate, whether from public domain lands under the
authority of the Israel Land Administration or from that of farmers and
villages who own the land. Arab
villages and towns routinely expand into public lands, fouling
water sources and seizing
property they do not own, and then defying the government to do
anything about it. And while the government occasionally issues a
demolition order, then braces itself for the rioting and the
international condemnations, these orders constitute only a fraction of
the illegal Arab construction.
While
Saudi Arabia and other Islamic states fund Arab land purchases, similar
Jewish ventures, such as Irving Moskowitz's developments in Jerusalem
meet with aggressive opposition from the EU and the State Department.
Once again the double standard is all too clear and it promotes the
growth of Arab towns and houses, at the expense of Jewish ones.
The
media, whether the international media, or the Israeli media, which is
just as left wing as its American and European counterparts, naturally
report the Arab side of the story. The culture of demonization they have
created toward Jewish farmers and residents helps justify the terrorist
attacks aimed at them. Every time the media reports on the victims of a
Muslim terrorist attack as "settlers", the labeling of Jewish
residents as subhuman continues.
Israel's
left wing parties have sold much of the secular public on the idea that
the "settlers" are the problem. This conveniently allows them
to ignore the fact that on Arabs maps and in the Islamic lexicon, all
Israeli Jews are settlers, regardless of which side of the demarcation
line they happen to be living on. Since non-Muslims cannot live in a
Muslim land except by agreeing to become Dhimmis and paying Jizya, under
Islamic law no Jews, aside from a handful of collaborators who
recognize the area as an Islamic ruled state like the Neturei Karta have
any right to live anywhere in Israel.
When
Zionist activists opposed to the Oslo Peace Process shouted that Hevron
is Jerusalem in the early 90's, they were laughed at. Today Jerusalem is
indeed Hevron, the new slogan should be that Tel Aviv is Hevron, because
any dividing lines of legitimacy exist only as a diplomatic fiction. The
idea that Muslims are any more reconciled to 1948 than they are to 1967,
and that returning to 1948 will somehow win their friendship is the
worst form of political and diplomatic delusion. But it is the dominant
policy of the EU and successive American and Israeli governments.
As
a result Israel is shrinking and Arab settlement is expanding. The
settlement freeze enacted under pressure from Obama has frozen the
ability of Jewish residents to build and expand homes, even those
already mortgaged and under construction. But Barak has gone even
further by barring Jewish
residents from planting trees. Jewish residents pay 28 shekels
for a cubic meter of water. Arab residents pay less than 50 agorot
(cents). The result is that Jewish
residents are being charged up to 50 times more for water. And
water is the lifeblood of farming in a generally arid part of the world.
Since
Oslo elements within the Israeli political system, aided and abetted by
foreign funding from the likes of Soros, have been on a crusade
to wipe out Jewish towns and villages in order to destroy the
conservative and Zionist parts of the country. The resulting quiet civil
war in which hundreds of thousands of Jewish villagers have been pitted
against the machinery of government bureaucracy, the judicial system and
various left wing activist groups, has only further increased
Arab settlements, at the expense of Jewish ones.
Every
institution that was once intended to promote Jewish residency, has
instead been transformed into a hostile force that aids and abets Arab
settlement, and works against Jewish settlement. Case in point, the
Jewish National Fund which normally refuses to plant trees outside the
Green Line around areas of Jewish residency, is donating 3,000 trees for
Rawabi, a new Palestinian Authority Fatah city set in a strategic
location.
While
inspectors march around every Jewish town looking for signs that anyone
has lifted up a hammer to bang in a nail on a door, Arab
construction is continuing non-stop, including on places like
Rawabi, an Arab settlement meant to house 40,000. And while Tony Blair
repeatedly warned Israel against building Jewish settlements, he himself
visited the headquarters of the Bayti Real Estate Investment Company
that is constructing Rawabi. Bayti is co-owned by the Qatari Diar Real
Estate Investment Company, which is itself owned by the Qatar Investment
Authority, which is an arm of the Government of Qatar.
Qatar
is an oil rich gulf dictatorship that is one of the biggest
funders of Hamas and Al
Queda. It is likely that Hamas and Al Queda would have
serious trouble continuing their operations without money from Qatar. It
is an Islamist
Sharia paradise much like the rest of its gulf neighbors and
it funds Jihad around the world.
Rawabi is another expression of the international Islamic Jihad, which
in this case takes the form of demographic warfare through Arab
settlement. Gulf State construction companies such as the Bin Laden
group are tools for promoting Islamic expansionism. And JNF's gestire of
appeasement is another example of how Israel's institutions continue to
collaborate with Arab settlement, even as they restrict Jewish
settlement.
The
global double standard
treats Israel's Jewish residents as foreign invaders who must be
expelled, despite the fact that the Jewish
presence in the land is a matter of record in virtually every
major world religion, while treating the Arabs,
many of whom came to the area from Egypt after the British conquest
and Jewish immigration created jobs, as indigenous natives who have
every right to be there.
This form of political ethnic cleansing has become the de facto
narrative, rooted in double talk about settlements and terrorism. But to
treat Jewish towns and villages as illegitimate and working to destroy
them, while encouraging the construction of Arab towns and villages
means that talk of "settlements" and "settlement
freezes" is nothing more than an international apartheid and the
Islamist agenda dressed up in seemingly reasonable talk. Until Israel's
Arab settlements are on the table, as much as Israel's are, the only
thing that Israel can do is reject this international mandate for ethnic
cleansing.
http://www.rightsidenews.com/201001068056/global-terrorism/israels-arab-settlements.html
|

We’re not going anywhere
Sara K. Eisen -- Published: 06.09.10, 17:33 / Israel
Opinion
Here’s the thing. I’ve been thinking about
poor Helen Thomas, who I believe was probably just saying what everyone thinks
and has therefore been made a scapegoat. Not that I really care, because we
ought to share the scapegoat status once in a while. It’s the least we can
do to dispel the stereotype that we are stingy, us irritating Jews.
Helen,
you know why we were in Germany and much of Eastern
Europe in the first place? (And by the way, if I follow your advice, do
you think the nice old ladies who got my grandmothers’ large houses and
farms from the Nazis in what was once Czechoslovakia
will kick the property back two generations? That would be cool because I’d
love a vineyard and an agricultural estate.)
We were in Germany and Hungary and Czechoslovakia and Russia
(where we were regularly just plain killed by Cossacks), and also, for many
centuries, Poland (ditto), because we were told to get the hell out of
England, France, and Spain.
(Or, you know, just plain killed by handsome and heroic fairytale knights.)
And
you know why we were in Western
Europe to begin with? Because we were told by the Greeks and the Romans
– wait for it – to get the hell out of “Palestine,” where we had been
living since the beginning of recorded history.
We
also ended up in Babylonia (Iraq) and other Middle Eastern and North African
countries, where we stayed as second class citizens for hundreds and hundreds
of years, till the Arab world finally caught up with the pagans and the
Christians in their hatred of the Jews. Amazing how the student has now far
surpassed the teacher. But I digress.
In
any event, there is no way around it: Jews being asked (usually not by old
ladies on the White House lawn) to get the hell out of anywhere and everywhere
is just the way it goes.
Persona
non grata in East Europe So
it came to pass that about 200 years BCE the Macabees got sick of it and
established a Jewish state in Palestine, within the Roman
Empire, which lasted till about the time of Jesus (another Pesky Jew)
and the destruction of the Second
Temple.
And
it also came to pass that Jewish settlers began arriving in Ottoman Palestine
in the late 1800s, after the Russians and the Poles made it clear that Jews
were persona non grata in Eastern Europe. Palestine was as good a place as any
to escape to, since it was the last place, about 2000 years before, that the
Jews had a sovereign state (see above). Never mind Jewish liturgy and texts
pining for Jerusalem,
since I know these are inadmissible in the international courts of the mind.
Anyway,
nowhere else wanted European Jews any more than Russia did, not even America
really, where there were very strict quotas, although the Americans, again
politely, refrained from all the messy European killing, which was apparently
in vogue until after Hitler. Besides, those Ottoman Turks, as now, were known
around the world for their amazing human rights activism and the Jews were
excited to see it firsthand. (No, not really. But…they were better than the
Polish peasants. Unless you were Armenian.)
But
when the Jews came back to Land
of Israel, it was suddenly necessary, once again, to tell them to get
the hell out. There was no living side by side, even though that was an
express Jewish desire right up until 1947/8, when the Partition Plan was
summarily rejected by the Arab
League, who started the war that Israel
won. If keeping land you win in a war others provoke (when you wanted to make
peace) is called occupation, Helen, the world’s axis of furious justice has
a lot bigger fish to fry than Israel.
The
Arab desire to kick the Jews the hell out of Palestine did not begin in 1967,
and not in 1948. It began the moment the initial groups of Jews arrived and
started to make the land flower and produce crops. The Hebron
Massacre of 1929, where marauding Arabs killed nearly 70 Jews and
wounded countless others, took place long before a single house was built over
the Green Line.
At
any rate, it seems that every time a Jewish minority starts to make a society
too successful – so annoying!!!! – the indigenous people start to feel
very uncomfortable, and tell them one way or another to get the hell out.
Nowhere
left for us to go But
now, alas, there is nowhere left for us to go, except the eternal place
Ahmadinejad wants us to go, and Haniyeh and Nasrallah, and Hitler before them,
and Khmelnitsky before him, and Haman before him, and so on. And, I suspect,
in her heart of hearts, perhaps Thomas and the likes of her, who, the pesky
Jew Freud may have observed, seriously let her slip show.
Let
me make it clear: I know that Israel has made mistakes over its 62 years, some
clumsy and inept (was there no intelligence regarding the terrorists aboard
the Mavi Marmara?!?), and some borderline immoral. But none worse than every
other democracy on earth has also done, and most much better than the large
majority of the UN rogue nations which condemn Israel daily have done…daily.
But
let’s be honest: the international community’s human rights crusades on
behalf of the Palestinians are just the latest Crusades, and the ones who
really suffer are not the Jews or the Israelis but the poor occupants of the Third
World who are ignored while the enlightened First
World castigates the Jews… and yes, of course, the Palestinians, who
are kept in misery by their own leadership in order to provide the polite Jew
haters with a media club to beat them with.
So
here’s the thing: We are not going anywhere this time, Helen. We totally get
it: Ya’ll pretty much hate us. It’s just the way it is, like a natural
law.
Nothing
we can do – not giving away pieces of Palestine/Israel (witness our
evacuation of Gaza in 2005, and handing over the keys to army bases and
greenhouses- a new economy! Food for the children! – which were summarily
torched as property of the infidels); not donating billions annually to global
charity, nor discovering a cure for Polio or the Theory of Relativity, or
writing revered legal and religious texts, or co-founding Google,
or manufacturing the microprocessor in the majority of laptops that spew Jew
hatred to the Internet, or founding Christianity itself, or championing
women’s rights and gay rights in the US and helping to bring about a human
rights revolution in America in the 60’s. None of those things will absolve
us of our real sin: Existing and overcoming.
I’m
really sorry they told you to get the hell out of the White
House, Helen. It really wasn’t your fault that you thought you could
say what you said. It’s not like it’s a secret: That’s what people
think.
But
this time, seriously. Getting the hell out is not in the cards. We’re just
sick of moving all the time.
I
know. Irritating.

The Israelis know that the Jews
have lived in the land of Israel without interruption for nearly 4,000 years.
They know that, except for a short Crusader kingdom, they are the only people
who have had independent sovereignty on this land. And they are the only
people for whom Jerusalem has been their capital.
They are not a foreign occupier
because the State of Israel is the child not of European colonialism but rather
of Ottoman decolonialization. It was that Jewish historical bond that led the
League of Nations 85 years ago to establish the right of the Jewish people to
reconstitute a Jewish homeland on all the territories west of the Jordan River,
all the way to the Mediterranean. That same right to a national home was
sanctioned again 59 years ago by the new United Nations. After an Arab invasion
40 years ago, the U.N. passed a resolution affirming Israel's right to
"secure and recognized boundaries." As Winston Churchill noted in
1922, "The Jews are in Palestine by right, not sufferance." And when
Yasser Arafat said there was no First or Second Temple in Jerusalem but only
"an obelisk," he, too, was trying to deny the history of the Jewish
people in Jerusalem. But this is the site of the binding of Isaac by Abraham,
the place where David built the altar on the threshing floor of Aravna to halt
the plague. The Temple Mount was where Jesus was brought as an infant and where
he later chased away the money-changers. Mentioned 20 times in the New
Testament, the Temple Mount is one of the cornerstones of the Judeo-Christian
ethical tradition of the West. Yet it is all denied by the Palestinians. This
obduracy, combined with waves of terrorism, has shattered the
Israeli-Palestinian relationship.
It was Arafat who invoked the Islamic terms of jihad and shahada;
it was Arafat who described "all of Palestine," which includes all of
Israel, as a "holy wakf," i.e., an Islamic trust that cannot
be given away; it was Arafat who introduced children to radical Islamic thinking
so that they could become terrorists and suicide bombers. The name that Arafat
gave to the violence that began in the year 2000 was not the "West Bank
intifada" but the "al-Aqsa intifada," making it clear that
religion was an integral part of the struggle. When suicide bombers blow up
Israelis, they don't yell, "Free Nablus!" They yell, "Allahu
Akbar!" The backdrop is Islamic and not territorial.
That is why the Middle East is so different from Northern Ireland, which
is sometimes falsely used as a comparison. The basic goal of the Irish
Republican Army was to create a united Ireland, to bring Ireland to Ulster, not
to London. Their goal was never to replace England with Ireland, unlike the
Palestinians who wish to rule not just in the West Bank and Gaza but in
Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Haifa. The IRA struggle was primarily a political one,
its violence not supported by the Roman Catholic Church. At its core the
conflict was over borders, whereas in the Middle East the conflict has become
not just a territorial conflict but much more of a religious one.
Arafat personified the Palestinian problem of leadership, and for a long
time the current president, Mahmoud Abbas, has been weak and ineffective. As
David Makovsky of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy put it,
"The people who are moderate are not effective. And the people who are
effective are not moderate." Today, the impossible Arafat has been replaced
by an impotent Abbas, but the new figure of Salaam Fayed as prime minister may
change the equation. He is the most talented Palestinian to emerge at the
leadership level. He recognizes that rather than continually presenting
themselves as victims, Palestinians must work to build a credible and honest
institution of government, beginning with reforming their security services.
Absent these reforms, the Palestinians will be unable to confront and
subdue Hamas, the jihadists, and the various warlords of the local militias in
the West Bank. The Israelis are naturally leery of Abbas because they witnessed
how Hamas so humiliatingly chased his men out of Gaza. They remember that Hamas
beat Fatah to win a plurality of the vote in the West Bank during the last
election; they have been warned by their security services that Hamas could take
over the West Bank if the Israeli Defense Forces weren't there. The Israelis
will be reluctant to fund, arm, and embrace a new Palestinian leadership that
has yet to tackle terrorism, yet to stop instilling hate in the young, yet to
stop printing maps without Israel, and yet to confront their own people with the
clear message that the end of terrorism is a precondition to progress. Had there
been a peace education in the West Bank parallel to that in Israel after Oslo,
no one would have joined Arafat's calls for war. Without such a program, signing
a piece of paper with the Palestinians is meaningless.
Fayed knows that Fatah must win popular support by focusing on health,
education, law, and order to improve the lives of the Palestinians; he knows
this means establishing an honest administration and a civil society that can
develop a functioning economy and middle class, rather than support a corrupt,
rich elite. (No wonder the Palestinians refer to Abbas's government as the
government of salaries.) He knows that the Israelis will be unable to pull out
of large sectors of the West Bank while they fear a Gaza-like repetition of
rockets raining on Ben-Gurion Airport and Tel Aviv. The Israelis fear that even
if a Palestinian state is officially demilitarized on paper, it could accumulate
within a few years a vast arsenal of weapons that could kill thousands of
Israelis. Gaza has shown that a security fence cannot prevent missiles from
flying over and killing and wounding Israelis. Then there is the fact that
Palestinians in the West Bank would control 60 percent of Israel's water. The
Israeli defense minister put it squarely: In those circumstances, Israel could
not leave the West Bank until it develops a defensive system against rocket
attacks. (USN&WR, 10/8/07, 68)
http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/mzuckerman/2007/09/28/mortimer-b-zuckerman-on-irans-campaign-of-repudiation.html


The Myth of “Settlements”:
Very briefly: The Ottoman Empire was the sovereign in the entire area. In
1917, while World War I was still raging, Britain issued the Balfour
Declaration. It designated “Paleatine” — extending throughout what is
now Israel (including the “West Band”) and what is now the Kingdom of
Jordan — as the homeland for the Jewish people. In 1922, the League of
Nations ratified the Balfour Declaration and designated Britain as the
mandatory power. Regrettably, Britain, for its own imperial reasons and
purposes, separated 76 percent of the land — that lying beyond the Jordan
River — to create the kingdom of Trans-Jordan (now Jordan) and made it
inaccessible to Jews. In 1947, tired of the constant bloodletting between
Arabs and Jews, the British threw in the towel and abandoned the Mandate. The
UN took over. It devised a plan by which the land west of the Jordan River
would be split between the Jews and the Arabs. The Jews, though with heavy
heart, accepted the plan. The Arabs virulently rejected it and invaded the
nascent Jewish state with the armies of five countries, so as to destroy it at
its birth. Miraculously, the Jews prevailed and the State of Israel was born.
When the smoke of battle cleared, Jordan was in possession of the West Bank
and Egypt in possession of Gaza. They were the “occupiers” and they
proceeded to kill many Jews and to drive out the rest. They systematically
destroyed all Jewish holy places and all vestiges of Jewish presence. The area
was “judenrein.”
In the Six-Day War of 1967, the Jews reconquered the
territories. The concept that Jewish presence in Judea/Samaria is illegal and
that the Jews are occupiers is bizarre. It just has been repeated so often and
with such vigor that many people have come to accept it. How about the
“Palestinians,” whose patrimony this territory supposedly is and about
whose olive trees and orange groves we hear endlessly? There is no such
people. They are Arabs — the same people as in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and
beyond. Most of them migrated into the territories and to “Israel proper,”
attracted by Jewish prosperity and industry. The concept of “Palestinians”
as applied to Arabs and as a distinct nationality urgently in need of their
own twenty-third Arab state, is a fairly new one; it was not invented until
after 1948, when the State of Israel was founded. http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_77.html
[USN&WR, 11/2010, 73]

ETHNIC CLEANSING
Mr. Netanyahu took the opportunity of the approaching holiday of Tu
Bishvat, a Jewish arbor day, to reaffirm Israel’s claim to the Etzion bloc
of settlements just south of Jerusalem. “Our message is clear,” he said
during a tree-planting ceremony there. “We are planting here, we will stay
here, we will build here. This place will be an inseparable part of the State
of Israel for eternity.”
The Etzion settlements were
settled by Jews before the Israeli state was established in 1948. The
area became part of the West Bank under Jordanian control after the 1948 war,
and the settlements were destroyed.
Some settlers returned there immediately after Israel captured the territory
from Jordan in the 1967 war, and the settlements
were rebuilt.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/01/25/world/25mideast_CA1
(NY Times, 1/25/10)


Did Obama
call on Israel to vacate Temple Mount?
Israeli politicians accuse president of 'misrepresenting history' in U.N. speech
(JERUSALEM,
WorldNetDaily , 9/24/09)
– Did President Obama yesterday adopt U.N. and Palestinian phraseology while
calling on Israel to give up the biblical West Bank and eastern sections of
Jerusalem, including the Temple Mount? Some members of the Israeli government
here reacted angrily to Obama's strongly worded demand – expressed during his
speech to the U.N. General Assembly – for the creation of a "viable,
independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation
that began in 1967."
The term "occupation" routinely is used by the Palestinians as well as
some countries hostile to the Jewish state in reference to Israel's presence in
the West Bank and Jerusalem. It is unusual for U.S. presidents to use the term,
although Jimmy Carter once famously called Israel's presence in the West Bank
and eastern Jerusalem "illegal." "Occupation that began in
1967" is a specific reference to the lands Israel retained after the Six
Day War of that year, particularly the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem,
including the Temple Mount.
The Palestinians never maintained any official capacity in either territory,
lands in which Jews have been present for thousands of years. The territories
came under Jordanian rule from 1948 until Israel captured them in 1967 after
Jordan's King Hussein ignored Israeli pleas for his country to stay out of the
Six Day War. Most countries rejected Jordan's initial claim on the area, which
it formally renounced in 1988.
Commenting on Obama's speech during a WND interview today, Tzipi Hotovely, a
Knesset member for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party, accused the
U.S. president of "misrepresenting history "
"Obama is misrepresenting Mideast history," she said. "The Jewish
people's right to live in Judea and Samaria is firstly rooted in the
Bible and God's promise 2,000 years before 1967." "I really believe
the whole 16-year process since the Oslo Accords (in which Israel gave up
land in exchange for promises of peace) has proven the settlements are not the
obstacle for peace. The main obstacle is the Palestinians' continued rejection
of Israel as a Jewish state even within the borders of 1967."
Danny Danon, another Likud Knesset member, told WND today, "Obama cannot
force this on Israel. We do not have a partner in Israel which is a viable
partner." Continued Danon: "Every concession Prime Minister Netanyahu
makes was not appreciated by the Palestinian Authority. The Jewish presence in
Judea and Samaria is an asset for Israeli security . Instead of pressuring
Israel, we would like to see the Obama administration deal with the real threat
– the global threat coming from Iran."
The West Bank is considered landlocked territory not officially recognized as
part of any country. Israel calls the land "disputed."
The Palestinians and the U.N. Security Council claims the West Bank is "occupied"
by Israel, which maintains overall control of most of the area while the
Palestinian Authority has jurisdiction in about 40 percent. The U.N. Security
Council is traditionally considered hostile to Israel. The West Bank borders
most of Israel's major cities, including Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Military
strategists long have estimated Israel must maintain most of the West Bank to
defend its borders from any ground invasion.
Many villages in the West Bank,
which Israelis commonly refer to as the "biblical heartland," are
mentioned throughout the Torah. The Book of Genesis says Abraham entered Israel
at Shechem (Nablus) and received God's promise of land for his offspring. He
later was buried in Hebron. The nearby town of Beit El, anciently called Bethel
meaning "house of God," is where Scripture says the patriarch Jacob
slept on a stone pillow and dreamed of angels ascending and descending a
stairway to heaven. In that dream, God spoke directly to Jacob and reaffirmed
the promise of territory. And in Exodus, the holy tabernacle rested in Shiloh,
believed to be the first area the ancient Israelites settled after fleeing
Egypt.
Obama's reference yesterday to "occupation that began in 1967" comes
after a top PA official, speaking on condition his name be withheld, said the
Obama administration largely has adopted the positions of the PA to create a
Palestinian state within two years based on the 1967 borders, meaning Israel
would retreat from most of the West Bank and eastern sections of Jerusalem. The
official said Obama also accepted the PA position that Israeli-Palestinian
negotiations begin where they left off under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who
went further than previous Israeli leaders in his concessions to the
Palestinians.
Olmert reportedly offered the PA not
only 95 percent of the West Bank and peripheral eastern Jerusalem neighborhoods
but also other territories never before offered by any Israeli leader,
including parts of the Israeli Negev desert bordering Gaza as well as sections
of the Jordan Valley. The official claimed the Obama administration will still
support the announcement of a Palestinian state within two years. "We
understand from the U.S. that the Netanyahu government is not in a position to
go against creating a state within two years," the official said. The
official claimed the Obama administration was ready to ultimately consider
"sanctions" against Israel if the Netanyahu government rejected
negotiations leading to a Palestinian state. The official refused to clarify
which sanctions he was referring to or whether he was specifically told by the
U.S. government it would consider sanctions.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110896

| No
Room in Obama's Jerusalem for the Jew |
| (rightsidenews.com,
11/22/09) |
|
The same media which can't be bothered to notice that there is a proxy
war going on between Iran and Saudi Arabia
in Yemen, with Saudi jets bombing civilian targets. Who have paid no
attention whatsoever to a week of violence between Algerians and Egyptians
that included stonings and death threats, are up in arms over the
building of 900 housing units in the Gilo neighborhood in Jerusalem.
The
Obama Administration and the media are naturally not upset by the Jerusalem
municipality's decision to build
500 housing units for Arabs in Jerusalem. No they're upset by a
private Jewish housing project
built on privately owned land. And that double standard aptly
conveys their premise that a Jewish
house in Jerusalem is a "settlement",
while an Arab house in Jerusalem is just a house. A Jewish home
violates the "status quo" and is "unhelpful for
peace", while an Arab home is just a home. There is of course a
name for that sort of policy, it's one that Jimmy Carter who is still
continuing his tour on behalf of Hamas knows quite well, Apartheid.
In
response to the Nof Zion construction,
Obama warned that, "additional
settlement building does not contribute to Israel's security".But
Nof Zion is not about security, as much as it is about an overcrowded Jewish
population in Jerusalem looking for someplace to
live. When the Arabs seized
half of Jerusalem in Israel's War of Independence, they forcibly
expelled the Jewish population of Jerusalem in a brutal act of ethnic
cleansing that goes ignored by the same leftists who focus on
elderly Arab men waving keychains in the air. Homes
belonging to Jewish families were replaced by Arab families,
who in turn were not expelled when Israel liberated and reunited both
halves of Jerusalem in 1967.
While
countries such as England
recognized Jordan's annexation of East Jerusalem, they have failed
to recognize Israel's reunification of the city. This has led
to the ongoing absurdity in which children born in Jerusalem are
treated as stateless by the US government and the US embassy remains
in Tel Aviv, while the
US Consulate in East Jerusalem does its best to pretend
that it's in the capital of Palestine, completely refusing to
recognize Israel's existence.
Were
security the issue, Gilo which faces the Arab towns of Beit Jala and
Al Khader, and has been shot at repeatedly from them, would be a poor
choice to live in. But Jerusalem is bulging at the seams. The price of
housing has shot up, and while US Ambassador Richard H. Jones may
have told Jewish residents of Jerusalem that "Sometimes
people do have to move to a different location. They cannot always
stay close to their families", the reality is that living
next to their families is exactly what people want to do. Regardless
of what the State Department thinks about the matter.
1800
years ago the Romans expelled the Jewish population of Jerusalem
and renamed it Aelia Capitolina, a pagan city, and renamed Israel,
Syria Palaestina. Today Obama
and the State Department seem determined to do the very same thing.
By calling a Jerusalem neighborhood, a "settlement", Obama
is actively attacking the right of Jews to live in Jerusalem. If
Jewish Jerusalem is a settlement, then effectively every other part of
Israel where Jews live is a settlement too.
When
even liberal US news outlets such as CNN have described Gilo as a
Jewish neighborhood, in contrast to radical left wing British outlets
such as the BBC and Reuters, who branded it as a
"settlement", Obama's shift is a deliberate one. Helpful as
always, UN Secretary General Ki Ban Moonbat stepped in to denounce
Gilo as a "settlement built on Palestinian land that undermines
efforts for peace". Considering that Gilo already holds a
population of 50,000, the land was privately owned and the Jewish
presence there goes back to the Book of Joshua, but the facts are no
obstacle to the lies.
In
Time
Magazine, the increasingly unhinged Joe Klein
claimed that Gilo "would be the capital of Palestine", with
presumably a Hadrianiac or Jordanian style ethnic cleansing solution
for the 50,000 Jews who live there right now. Not that I imagine that
would stop him in the least, so long as he had someone else to do the
dirty work for him.
But
finally what is the basis for calling the Gilo
neighborhood a "settlement"? The
land on which Gilo was built was bought and owned by its Jewish
residents. That land was occupied and seized by Jordan in 1948, until
Israel liberated the territory in 1967. To call Gilo a
"settlement", recognizes the Jordanian invasion and seizure
of the land as legitimate, while treating the Jewish presence there as
illegitimate.
And
that is the real basis behind all this madness. The reason why a
Jewish home in Jerusalem or anywhere in Israel is a settlement. To
speak of "settlements" is to claim
that the Jewish presence in Israel is illegitimate. And while
some Israeli leftists may fondly imagine that settlers are religious
Jews who live in caravans, as the case of Gilo once again
demonstrates, all of Israel is a settlement.
And
that is why as far as the world's diplomats are concerned, an Arab
terrorist has more right to open fire on a Jewish family driving down
the road, than the Israeli army has to shoot that same terrorist. And
by giving in to US pressure to negotiate directly with the PLO, by
signing the Oslo accords and by repeatedly agreeing to talk peace with
Arafat and Abbas, the door was opened to greater and greater
delegitimization of Israel.
Israel's
global diplomatic position is far worse than it was 17 years ago.
Israel's strategic position is far worse than it was 17 years ago. The
most rabid bigotry and the ugliest incitement has become the norm, the
sort of language you would once hear in Ridyah or Damascus has now
become cocktail party chatter in London, Paris and Washington D.C. All
of Israel's concessions have combined to put a gun to Jerusalem, and
then to the rest of the land for a great going out of business,
everything must go sale.
The
case of Gilo is one more wake up call that not only our terrorist
"peace partners", but even the so-called honest brokers
of the world community do not
believe that Jews have the right to live anywhere in Israel.
Their backing of a Palestinian state has nothing to do with peace, as
the fact that peace has failed to emerge over 17 years has not in any
way dampened their ardor and enthusiasm for the project. Nor is it
about a Two State Solution bringing regional stability. Even the
dimmest paper pushers in the State Department and Foreign Ministry
know that even were a Palestinian state to be created, the result
would be more regional instability, not less. Only a One State
Solution can succeed, and that solution is an Arab state and no
Israel. The "Peace Process" and the "Two State
Solution" are an incremental approach to bringing about that
final solution.
The
men and women who toiled and worked the land, who turned
swamps and desert into farmland and cities, understood that if
there was no room for Jews in Israel, there was no room for Jews
anywhere. Palestinian Islamic terrorism in turn is driven by
the national and religious imperative to destroy the only non-Muslim
country in the Middle East. And while America
and Europe decry Israel's capital as a Jewish settlement, Muslim
settlements are springing up in their own capitals. While the
cocktail party chatter is that serving up Israel on a platter to the
beast will keep them safe, the violence is already in their streets.
The same violence that Israel was built as a refuge against. And if
Israel falls, they will be the next item on the menu.
http://www.rightsidenews.com/200911227437/global-terrorism/no-room-in-obamas-jerusalem-for-the-jew.html
|

Israel's Historic Achievement
Jews have lived in
the land of Israel for over 3,300 years since 1312 B.C They had lived
there at least 1,800 years before the
Arab conquest of 635 C.E., which lasted only 22 years. Jerusalem was the
Jewish capital for over 3,300 years and never was the capital of any Arab or
Muslim entity. King David founded Jerusalem; Muhammad never set foot in it. Jews
pray facing Jerusalem, and Muslims face Mecca. Jerusalem is mentioned hundreds
of times in the Old Testament and not once in the Koran. The Jews have never had
any other national homeland. When the Roman Empire later extended its rule to
Israel and colonized the land, the Romans decimated the Jewish population and
exiled the Jews to Europe and other parts of the empire. In A.D. 70, the Second
Temple was destroyed by Titus, who returned to Rome in 71 with 14,000 Jews as
slaves and forced them to build the Roman Coliseum. But the Jews never lost the
connection to their ancestral home.
Through the centuries of Ottoman rule and the years of the
British mandate after World War I, the Jews kept faith in their history and came
back—to the displeasure of the others ("Arabs" for short) who had
moved in. Deadly Arab riots against Jews
occurred in 1920, 1929, and 1936-1939. In World War ii, the Jews themselves
fought on two fronts, fending off attacks by the Arabs who favored the Nazis and
serving alongside the British against Hitler. There was not one inch on all the
surface of the Earth that the Jews could call home until the 1947 vote of the
United Nations in favor of the establishment of Jewish and Arab states. Thus
ended the longest exile ever endured by a people. After almost 2,000 years of
homelessness and wandering since the Romans sacked Jerusalem, the Jewish people
came miraculously home.
This is a story without parallel, of a love of a people for
the land of Israel. In this land in ancient times, the Jewish people were born.
In this land in modern times, the Jewish people were reborn. They have never
left Israel voluntarily and returned when they could, from more than a hundred
countries speaking more than 80 languages, a modern-day gathering of the exiles.
More than 3,000 years earlier, Moses had prophesied, "Even if you have been
banished to the most distant land under the heavens, from there the Lord your
God will gather you and bring you back." And so it was.
The day after the vote for partition,
Arab gunmen began ambushing Jews, and then five Arab armies invaded. That marked
the start of the tragedy that persists today. The Palestinians who were urged by
Arab leaders to leave Israel have never been integrated with their
coreligionists. All these years since 1948, their "host" countries
have held them hostage in camps (and the integrated refugees have now grown to
several million people). They cannot be returned, for if that were to happen,
there would be no state at all for the Jewish people. The Republican nominee for
the presidency in 1940, Wendell Willkie, summed up the competing claims this
way: "The Arabs have a good case in Palestine. There is only one thing
wrong with it—the Jews have a better case." Time and again, the Palestinians
have been offered an Arab state next to Israel: first, in the partition
plan of 1947; then, in the Oslo accords; then at Camp David in 2000; and
finally, in countless declarations since then by both Israeli and international
leaders. All have met with a violent rejection by the Palestinians and by the
Arab countries
The refusal to accept the existence of Jews in a separate
state of Israel is worse than anti-Semitism. It is, as former Canadian Minister
of Justice Irwin Cotler described it, "a genocidal
anti-Semitism, the
public calls for the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people," wherever
they may be. Listen to the state-sanctioned genocidal anti-Semitism in Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's Iran, made clear by the publicly avowed intent to acquire nuclear
weapons for this purpose. It is in the language of the covenants, charters,
platforms, and policies of the terrorist movements and militias of Hamas,
Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and al Qaeda, which call not only for the destruction
of Israel and the killing of Jews but also for acts of terrorism in furtherance
of that objective, supported by religious fatwas in which these
genocidal calls are held out as religious obligations. All this comes from a
culture that greets brutal deeds of terrorism with glee and celebrates martyrs
and their families.
The Jews who became Israelis have built a thriving economy,
based to a large extent on their human capital. They revived as a spoken
language an ancient language, Hebrew. They have integrated new arrivals from
around the world and resolutely maintained a vibrant, free, and democratic
society; they have created the political and economic infrastructure of a
nation; and they have survived in war after existential war as Psalm 129
foretold. "Sorely have they afflicted me from my youth, yet they have not
prevailed against me." They have cultivated desolate lands with one of the
world's most innovative agricultural economies; they have established legal
systems that protect civil liberties against the backdrop of the most lethal
security threats. They have made a home for the world's largest Jewish
population, passing America by about 1 percentage point. They have fulfilled
Israel's destiny to give Jewish communities threatened from without, or
assimilated to the point of extinction from within, a place to survive and
thrive. This is the dream that has come true. Even though Israel seeks no
allegiance and loyalty from anyone who is not an Israeli citizen, the
realization of the dream and the remarkable historical event that Israel
represents with its rebirth have evoked the spirit of kinship and emotional and
association with those who share the Judeo-Christian community throughout the
world.
They have failed in one respect. They have been unable to
make peace with terrorists, but it is because the terrorists
reject all compromise. But Israel fights those bent on its destruction
within the rule of law and within reasonable constraints of human rights and
civil behavior, a remarkable model in an era of terrorism. The achievements are
without parallel, but Israel remains a permanently embattled nation. Today, as
Israel celebrates its 60th anniversary of independence, Iran develops nuclear
weapons, Kassam rockets are daily fired into Sderot from Gaza, and Hamas
continues to threaten Israel with more and more terrorism. In the north,
Hezbollah remains a potential threat, building up its inventory of longer range,
more lethal rockets; prospects for peace with Syria look as dim as ever; and
negotiations with those few Palestinians who seem to wish to live in peace are
barely progressing. Israel is in a long-term struggle for its security in a
region with virtually no margin for error. But President Bush, in his speech
last week to the Knesset, gave the members comfort when he said, "Israel's
population may be just over 7 million. But when you confront terror and evil,
you are 307 million strong, because the
United States of America stands with you." (USN&WR, 5/26/08, 72)
http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/mzuckerman/2008/05/16/israels-historic-achievement.html?PageNr=3

Arabs launched terrorism against unarmed Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, and
1936 to 1939, murdering hundreds of Jewish civilians. In 1929, the grand mufti
of Jerusalem ordered the slaughter of more than a hundred rabbis, students, and
others whose ancestors had lived in Hebron for millenniums. The Saudi
Prince Bandar said that Arafat's refusal to accept 95 percent of the West Bank
and all of Gaza was "a crime" and his account of the circumstances was
"not truthful." (USN&WR, 5/5/08, 72)
Israel through the years
November 29, 1947: U.N. General Assembly proposes partitioning Palestine
into Jewish and Arab states.
May 14, 1948: State of Israel proclaimed. Neighboring Arab states invade
the next day, ending in October 1949.
[In late October 1956, instigated by
Britain and France during the crisis over Egypt's seizure of the Suez Canal,
Israel invaded the Sinai Peninsula to destroy military bases. Israel captured
Gaza and Sharm el Sheikh at the tip of the Sinai Peninsula that controls access
to the Gulf of Aqaba. It also occupied most of Sinai east of the canal.
According to plan, the British and French intervened in the conflict to enforce
a U.N. cease-fire. The crisis ended in December when the United Nations
stationed a peacekeeping force in Sinai. Israel withdrew in March 1957.]
June 1967: Israel captures Gaza Strip, Golan Heights, West Bank and east
Jerusalem in Six Day War against Egypt, Syria and Jordan. More than one million
Palestinians come under Israeli military occupation.
October 6, 1973: Egypt and Syria launch surprise attack against Israel,
making initial gains. Israel recoups, aided by massive U.S. arms airlift, and a
cease-fire takes effect Oct. 24.
September 1978: Egypt and Israel agree on frameworks for peace in the
Middle East. A treaty is signed in Washington on March 26, 1979, under which
Israel is to withdraw from the Sinai in three phases.
June 1982: Israeli forces invades Lebanon and do not withdraw until
February 1985, leaving behind an Israel-backed Christian Lebanese force to act
as a control over and buffer against attacks by Palestinian guerrillas and
Islamic militants.
December 1987: Palestinian uprising in West Bank and Gaza breaks out. The
revolt lasts six years.
September 1993: In secret talks in Oslo, Norway, Israel and the PLO
produce an interim framework for autonomy in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. In
the first stage, Israel pulls out of most of the Gaza Strip and area of Jericho
in West Bank.
October 1994: Jordan and Israel sign peace treaty calling for close
economic and political cooperation; Jordan becomes Israel's closest ally in
region.
September 2000: Violence flares again and Israel eventually reoccupies
most Palestinian towns in the West Bank.
July 2006: The Lebanon war begins after Hezbollah guerrillas cross the
Israel-Lebanon border and attack an Israeli patrol, killing three soldiers and
capturing two others. Israel bombards Lebanon from the air and then invades, and
Hezbollah launches nearly 4,000 rockets at Israeli population centers. In 34
days of fighting, 159 Israelis were killed, including 119 soldiers. (OCR,
5/4/08, News 3)

DAYTON,
Ohio (AP, 2/24/06) - Ohio Farmers
Seeking Israel's Expertise. Farmers in Israel raise crops in conditions
that couldn't be more foreign to their Ohio counterparts. But the arid soils,
limited water and cramped spaces have turned Israeli
farmers into experts at making
crops bloom in the desert. A group of Ohio farmers hopes to use that
expertise to improve productivity. A 29-person delegation is leaving for a
10-day trip to Israel to learn everything from water management to milk
processing to handling urban expansion. "I'm extremely intrigued by the
ability of them to grow enough crops for 7 million people in the desert,"
said Daniel Corcoran, 42, who raises soybeans, wheat and alfalfa on his
4,000-acre family farm near Waverly in southern Ohio. "Hopefully, there are
things we can bring back here." Israel is one of the most densely
populated countries in the world. Only
about 20 percent of the land can be farmed and half of that has to be irrigated.
But Israel not only produces most of its
own food, it also has enough to export. Fruit, vegetables and fertilizer
are among the most successful exports. Israeli farms have prospered by
irrigating crops, seeding clouds to increase rainfall, landscaping to redirect
floodwaters toward crops and using drip irrigation so that crops receive the
precise amount of water and fertilizer. The Israelis have also developed
computer-controlled greenhouses that have curtains, skylights and netting to
control sunlight and temperature. The trip is being hosted by the Ohio
Department of Agriculture and the Cleveland-based Negev Foundation, a group
whose mission is to develop agriculture in the southern, largely desert portion
of Israel. The journey is part of a larger initiative to help Israelis benefit
from business opportunities in Ohio and from sharing ideas with Ohio
agricultural researchers. Last fall, Israeli farmers promoted their products at
the Farm Science Review in London, Ohio. Ram Ben-Dor, 52, lived on an Israeli
farm for 20 years, raising poultry and fruit. He said the Ohio farmers should be
able to help Israelis with technologies that would increase their productivity
and make them more competitive in world markets. He said it would be an
opportunity to make contacts that could increase soybean imports from Ohio. Sam
Hoenig, foundation president, said Israeli farmers are also interested in Ohio's
expertise on turf as they seek to develop recreational areas. Among those going
on the trip are several Ohio fish farmers. John Bechtel raises trout, perch and
bluegill near Fredericktown in central Ohio. He is most interested in how the
Israelis prevent the spread of disease among fish. He also wants to tap into
their knowledge about fish nutrition, genetics and water-quality management.
"They use water over and over again," Bechtel said. "That is the
future of fish farming." Bob Peterson raises hogs and grows corn, soybeans
and wheat on his farm in central Ohio. But residential and commercial
development from Columbus, Cincinnati and Dayton keeps creeping in. He hopes to
see how Israeli farmers manage to work in densely populated areas while
increasing production and profits.

CRASH COURSE ON the ARAB
ISRAELI CONFLICT
1. Nationhood and Jerusalem. Israel became a nation in 1312 B.C.E., two
thousand years before the rise of Islam.
2. Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian
people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of
Israel.
3. Since the Jewish conquest in 1272 B.C.E. the Jews have had dominion over the
land for one thousand years with a continuous presence in the land for the past
3,300 years.
4. The only Arab dominion since the conquest in 635 C.E. lasted no more than 22
years.
5. For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital. Jerusalem has
never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity Even when the Jordanians
occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital, and Arab leaders
did not come to visit.
6. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in Tanach, the Jewish Holy Scriptures.
Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran.
7. King David founded the city of Jerusalem. Mohammed never came to
Jerusalem.
8. Jews pray facing Jerusalem. Muslims pray with their backs toward
Jerusalem.
9. Arab and Jewish Refugees: In 1948 the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave
Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Sixty-eight percent
left without ever seeing an Israeli soldier.
10. The Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab lands due to Arab
brutality, persecution and pogroms.
11. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is estimated to be
around 630,000. The number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands is estimated to be
the same.
12. Arab refugees were INTENTIONALLY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab
lands to which they fled, despite the vast Arab territory. Out of the
100,000,000 refugees since World War II, theirs is the only refugee group in the
world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own peoples' lands.
Jewish refugees were completely absorbed into Israel, a country no larger than
the state of New Jersey.
13. The Arab - Israeli Conflict: The Arabs are represented by eight separate
nations, not including the Palestinians. There is only one Jewish nation. The
Arab nations initiated all five wars and lost. Israel defended itself each time
and won.
14. The P.L.O.'s Charter still calls for the destruction of the State of Israel.
Israel has given the Palestinians most of the West Bank land, autonomy under the
Palestinian Authority, and has supplied them with weapons.
15. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated and the Jews were
denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian
sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths.
16. The U.N. Record on Israel and the Arabs: of the 175 Security Council
resolutions passed before 1990, 97 were directed against Israel.
17. Of the 690 General Assembly resolutions voted on before 1990, 429
18. The U. N was silent while 58 Jerusalem Synagogues were destroyed by the
Jordanians.
19. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians systematically desecrated the
ancient Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives
20. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians enforced an apartheid-like policy
of preventing Jews from visiting the Temple Mount and the Western Wall.
http://a-voice.org/discern/islam.htm

In a complete turnabout from previous positions, but probably
also yielding to enormous pressure by President Obama, Israel’s Prime Minister
“Bibi” Netanyahu has declared his willingness to accept a Palestinian
state.A generous offer. Since the “two-state solution” has long been
declared to be the Holy Grail of the Palestinians, one would have expected that
Mr. Netanyahu’s announcement be greeted with cheers and hosannas. That,
however, not surprisingly perhaps, was not the case. In fact, the Palestinians
and all others involved declared it to be an insult and a “non-starter.” The
principal objections were that Mr. Netanyahu insisted that the newly created
Palestinian state would have to be totally demilitarized, and that its air space
would be available to the IAF (Israeli Air Force); that Jerusalem would remain
undivided as the capital of the Jewish state; that the “Palestinian
refugees” would, if they so desired, be returned to the newly formed state and
not to Israel; that the Palestinians acknowledge Israel as the state of the
Jews; and, finally, that he did not commit for the “settlements” to be
dismantled.
The “Settlements.”
Judea/Samaria (the “West Bank”) is the ancient Biblical homeland of the
Jewish people. This area is part of the Palestinian Mandate, which was declared
by the Balfour Declaration and by the mandate of the League of Nations, to be
the homeland of the Jewish people. After the 1948 War of Israel’s Liberation
this area remained in possession of the Kingdom of Jordan, which declared
sovereignty over the area. The only possible rationale for the conclusion that
this area is Palestinian land is that it is encompassed by the 1949 armistice
line. There is absolutely no other reason. This area has never been Palestinian
land. In fact, never before the creation of the State of Israel has there ever
been a Palestinian people or a Palestinian country anywhere in the long course
of human history. The Palestinians were never until recent times in any control
over the area. At the very most, the area could be described as “disputed.”
In fact, a very good case could be made that Jews have a better right than the
Arabs to live there. What a shame that even the leaders of our country cannot
see this fundamental truth. And don’t let’s forget that over one million
Arabs live in Israel unmolested and nobody gets exercised about that.
Demilitarization.
Not so long ago, Israel unilaterally evacuated every last Jewish family from
Gaza. One would have hoped that the Palestinians, grateful for being rid of the
hated Jews and no longer having to suffer their presence, would have shown their
gratitude for that “liberation.” Instead, almost from the very first day,
they bombarded Israeli cities with thousands of rockets. Eventually, the
patience of Israel snapped and it invaded Gaza to put a stop to this outrage. It
has to be clear to all that having had such bad experience with Gaza, Israel is
fully justified to expect that if statehood were ultimately granted to the
Palestinians, and if demilitarization were not imposed and strictly supervised,
the Palestinians of the “West Bank” would be equally inclined to attack
Israel on a daily basis. Instead of being confronted by the insular Gaza, Israel
would be surrounded totally by those who are sworn to destroy it. Full
demilitarization would have to be a key requirement of any Palestinian
statehood. Without it, virtually all of Israel – its population centers, its
industries, its military installations and its international airport – would
be under the gun. Life in Israel would be virtually impossible. How could
anybody possibly think otherwise?
Return of the “Refugees.”
During the 1948 War of Liberation, about 650,000 Arabs, goaded by their leaders,
fled the nascent state of Israel. They and their descendants wish to
“return” to Israel. That is a bizarre request. The principal purpose of a
Palestinian state would obviously have to be the ingathering and settling of the
“Palestinian refugees” and not to foist them onto Israel. Injecting them
into Israel would undermine the Jewish state and smooth the path to its
destruction. And that is, indeed, the rub. The principal intent of the Arabs is
not the creation of a state, but, as they repeat over and over, the destruction
of Israel, which they call the “cancer on the Arab body.” And don’t
let’s forget that about 800,000 Jews, who escaped barely with their lives from
Arab countries during the War of Liberation in 1948 and during the Six-Day War
in 1967, were quickly absorbed into the state of Israel and are now at least
one-half of the total population. The Arabs, in contrast, have kept their
“refugees” in miserable refugee camps for the last 60+ years, on the dole of
the world – mostly that of the United States.
There is little likelihood that Mr. Netanyahu’s generous
offer, however it might ultimately be modified, will be accepted by the Arabs.
Because, if that were the objective, they could have had their own state for
over seventy years. But whatever was offered was never sufficient. As Abba Eban,
Israel’s former Foreign Secretary, so well put it: “The Arabs will never
miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” Sadly, therefore, there is little
question that Mr. Netanyahu’s generous offer of a separate state for the
Palestinians will again be rejected – most likely even being followed by
another “intifada.”
http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_117.html
(USN&WR, 9/09, 97)

The War Against Israel Goes On
The « Gaza flotilla » failed. Only one boat reached the eastern coast
of the Mediterranean. Most of them could not even leave their ports of
departure. An attempt to replace the fleet with a « flytilla » of
demonstrators on a plane to Tel Aviv failed miserably.
It would, however, be dangerous to consider this failed attempt more
than a limited and short-lived victory. « Pro-Palestinian » organizations in
Europe and the United States continue to spread their venom and are already
preparing for their next battles : the quest for a U.N. recognition of a
Palestinian state within the « 1967 borders », and the organization of the
Durban III summit on September 22nd in New York.
These organizations must be seen for what they are : instruments in a
war against Israel that has never stopped since 1948, and that has simply
undergone a change in tactics.
Israel's enemies initially resorted to conventional armies fighting on
behalf of the « Arab nation ». Each time, they were defeated.
They then decided to resort to terrorism, propaganda and disinformation.
They created movements to carry out attacks; bloody and deadly attacks took
place. These attacks only stopped when Israel undertook security measures --
such as a long, electronic barrier – that reduced to almost zero the
possibility of successfully carrying them out. Propaganda and disinformation,
however, have not stopped.
We have now reached the next phase : the effects of propaganda and
misinformation. These are firmly anchored in the minds of millions, and have
begun to take root in reality,
The aim is still to wipe Israel off the
map, but to do it by using other
means: demonization, suggesting that Israel is a criminal state whose demise
is perhaps even necessary; exploitation of prejudices; boycotts that, if
pursued literally, would only deprive the boycotters of medicine and
technology that they they have no intention of going without; willful
blindness over both the history and the facts of the growth of the state of
Israel, and falsifications leading to other falsifications.
No one had heard of a « Palestinian people » before the
mid-1960s.
They did not exist. Israel under the British Mandate until Israel' s
Independence in 1948 was called Palestine. All Jews who were born there until
i948 had the word « Palestine » stamped on their passports. The current
Palestinians are those Arabs who, for a variety of reasons, decided to leave
the land during the 1947 War of Independence, when five countries - Jordan,
Egypt, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq - attacked the 600,000 people in the fledgling
state of Israel the day after its birth, hoping to kill it in the crib. After
all five countries were stopped, repelled and defeated, and after the Arabs
who had fled asked to return, they were told that as they had not stayed to
help fight, they were regarded as a fifth column, and were therefore not
welcome. The Arabs who did stay are the Israeli Arabs who live there now, and
who comprise 20% of the population, or over a million and a half out of seven
million people. They live freely among the Jews ; freely elect members of
Israel's parliament [Knesset]; operate their own independent political
parties ; hold judgeships on Israel's Supreme Court; practice as physicians
alongside Jewish doctors in Israeli hospitals and as professors in Israeli
universities ; and often volunteer to fight alongside Jews in the Israeli
army, even though they are not required to join Israel's defense forces.
At this moment, however, multitudes are certain that a « Palestinian
people » have existed for centuries; were dispossessed of their rights and
are now engaged in a « national liberation struggle » to free themselves
from their « oppressors. » The fact is : there has never been an independent
Palestinian State or any Palestinian territory – the word comes from the
Philistines of the Bible who sailed up from what is now North Africa. But
those who are sure that a « Palestinian people » exists, however, are also
sure there are « Palestinian territories » occupied by Israel but that used
to belong to the « Palestinian people, » and must therefore be returned to
their « legitimate » owners.
The idea that millions of human beings were driven by force from the
territory of Israel and therefore have a full « right of return» may easily
be deduced from that fictitious version of events. The idea that the day
Israel was created was a « catastrophe » (naqba) for the «
Palestinian people » may be deduced from it as well. It then become simple
enough to add that the « Palestinian people » are victims of a « genocide
» committed by the Israelis.
The fact that Jews have lived for over two millennia in Judea-Samaria
and throughout the city of Jerusalem is erased from memories and history
books. Also erased is the ethnic cleansing that banished Jews from the West
Bank and East Jerusalem in 1947-48. And in the name of the « rights » of the
« Palestinian people, » a new ethnic cleansing -- banishing the Jews again
from the West Bank and East Jerusalem -- may perversely be considered a «
moral » imperative, and anyone who disagrees may perversely be called an «
extremist. »
Leaders of terrorist movements who never renounced terrorism were given
a quasi-State, the Palestinian Authority, which is now treated in may
countries throughout the world as a legitimate entity.
Leaders of Hamas, who openly call for a holy war [jihad], from
their Charter on down, and who created a totalitarian regime in Gaza, recently
nearly made an agreement with the Palestinian Authority, but no one in the
West seems to worry. No one dares say anything : « Palestinians » are almost
universally regarded as the epitome of the wretched of the earth -- without
anyone asking why the Arabs should not be blamed for insisting they be penned
in camps, or the United Nations, which not only keeps them penned in these
camps, but also reinforces and promotes the Palestinians' revisionist version
of events -- so that with this tonnage of disinformation, the « Palestinian
cause » is almost unanimously considered as holy.
Meanwhile, in several European countries, Israeli politicians are
subject to prosecution for alleged « war crimes, » which seem mainly to
consist of efforts to defend themselves from people pledged to their
destruction.
Israel is compared to South Africa in the apartheid era or to the Third
Reich.
The electronic security fence, erected to keep terrorists out and
protect Israelis' freedom, is recklessly and maliciously compared to the
Berlin Wall, erected to keep East Germans in and deprive them of
freedom.
Despite massive evidence to the contrary, the blockade of the Gaza Strip
is described as a means to prevent the entry of food and medicine into Gaza ;
it is said to create unbearable suffering. The fact that the border between
Gaza and Egypt was recently opened -- but then closed by Egypt again a few
weeks later - - is totally ignored. Why are there no flotillas demanding that
Egypt open its border to Gaza ?
« Boycott, divestment and sanctions » campaigns are being organized
around the world against Israeli companies, against the sale of Israeli
products, and against Israeli academics, artists and scientists.
The results are evident in Europe. In surveys conducted year after year,
Israel is regarded as the « most dangerous country for world peace » and as
the main cause of unrest in the Middle East. During televised debates in
France and Germany, voicing the idea that Israel is a « parenthesis in
history » or a « mistake » that must be corrected, is no longer taboo.
Books that viciously denigrate Israel and cast doubt on the existence of the
Jewish people become best sellers. One of them, The Invention of the Jewish
People, by Shlomo Sand, received a prestigious literary prize, the Prix
Aujourd'hui, in France in 2009.
Polls showing that a huge majority of the « Palestinian people » are
murderously anti-Semitic and want Jews annihilated are never quoted in the
press ; if there are any mentions of such views, they are carefully «
sanitized» to seem more benign than they actually are.
The situation is not as catastrophic in the United States, but is
deteriorating ; it could continue to deteriorate unless strong vigilance comes
into play and the intelligence community face realities they would rather not
know about.
The failure of the « Gaza flotilla » and the « flytilla » should not
be allowed to conceal the « pro-Palestinian » agitation that goes on, and
that the aim of the agitators and those they support remains unchanged: They
are at war; they want the destruction of Israel; they will not stop. They
create a hatred of Israel that never ceased to grow, and that looks as if the
agitators are hoping for a return to all kinds of attacks.
Arsenals are growing fast in Lebanon and Gaza. Iran, extremely unstable,
may soon have nuclear weapons. The Syrian regime is engaged in a crackdown
suitable to that government's hazardous decisions. In Egypt, the Muslim
Brotherhood is at the gates of power. In the Gaza Strip Hamas, the «
Palestinian » branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which took over political
control within a few weeks of being democratically elected by throwing PLO and
Fatah sympathizers off the top floors of high buildings, is eager to take over
the West Bank should the opportunity arise.
A war ends only when there is a winner and a loser. For now, Israel's
enemies have not lost. But Israel has not yet won.
http://www.hudson-ny.org/2304/war-against-israel
August 8, 2011 at 5:00 am

Security
Fence
A
growing number of Israeli politicians believe that the only way to protect
Israeli citizens from Palestinian terrorist attacks is to build a fence between
Palestinian and Israeli territory. "There are nearly no instances of
suicide bombers, Palestinian guerrillas or weapons infiltrating through the
border fences in Gaza." (LAT, 8/20/01, A3) ..... "Suicide attacks left
25 Israelis dead and about 220 injured in less than one day's time." (LAT,
12/3/01, A1) ..... 25 Israelis would be equal proportionally to 1,130
Americans. (LAT, 12/4/01, B4) ..... "During 14 months of fighting with
Israel, Yasser Arafat mostly looked the other way as Islamic militants and some
of his own supporters killed more than 230 Israelis with guns and bombs."
(OCR, 12/4/01, News 20) [Proportionally equivalent to 10,396 Americans] .....
Two suicide attacks [about 3/28/02, Passover] killed 40 and injured 200, because
Hamas now is using weapons-grade explosives. (OCR, 4/4/02, News 7) .....
The Mossad hunted down and killed nearly all the Palestinians responsible for
killing 11 Israelis during the 1972 Munich Olympics. (OCR, 11/29/02, News 10)
..... There are 5.2 million Jews and 1.3 million Arabs in Israel, with 3.5
million Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza. The Arab birth rate exceeds the Jewish
birth rate. If the Arab and Jewish areas are not partitioned, the entire area
may become dominated by Arabs. (OCR, 12/13/03, News 31) ..... The intifada
has failed
because of the Israeli Army's killings or arrests of several thousand
Palestinian militants, its seige of Palestinian cities, villages, and refuge
camps, and its erection of a high
concrete and barbed-wire security barrier
in the West Bank. (USN&WR, 1/10/05, 24)
Sharon
endorsed a buffer zone separating Israel from the West Bank. It could be a mile
or two wide in places, to stop suicide bombers and other attackers from slipping
across the porous borders from the West Bank. (OCR, 9/8/01, News 34) .....
The Gaza neighborhood, where the homes were demolished, has been a hotbed of
violence. Palestinian gunmen routinely lob grenades at Israeli army outposts
guarding the border with Egypt, and fire at the outposts and at Israeli patrols.
The army had previously destroyed homes in the area in an attempt to create a buffer
zone
near the border. (LAT, 1/14/02, A3) ..... "In Sharon's Feb. 21 [2002]
speech, he said he would implement a Cabinet decision calling for
buffer zones
between Israel and the Palestinian territories." (OCR, 3/2/02, News 23)
..... The "idea of
partition
- or unilateral separation - which seemed a radical idea a year or so ago, has
become a live option in Palestinian and Israeli politics. Nobody knows how
separation would work - whether it would require a large structure like the
Berlin Wall or simply a fence - but there are already factions within the
separation movement." (OCR, 3/11/02, Local 6) ..... Sharon said that once
Israel withdrew from the West Bank, "our forces will deploy to constitute
a
buffer
between Palestinian territories and our territories in order to prevent any
penetration in Israeli communities." This may involve Israeli forces
remaining in some areas of the West Bank. (OCR, 4/9/02, News 6) .....
Israeli military and civilian officials said that Israeli troops plan to
withdraw from Palestinian areas and perhaps establish a several-mile wide
buffer zone
in an effort to fend off future attacks. (OCR, 4/14/02, News 8) ..... Israel
plans to build
physical barriers
to separate the West Bank from Israel proper, to erect fences and giant
obstacles to make it more difficult for terrorists to penetrate Israel. (OCR,
4/22/02, News 4) ..... A 9-foot high barbed-wire fence
and broad 6-foot deep trench stretch several miles separating two towns, Jewish
Gila and Palestinian Beit Jalla. Similar fence and trench systems are in other
parts of the West Bank. (OCR, 5/25/02, News 46) ..... To prevent suicide
bombings, Sharon approved a fence
between part of the West Bank and Israel, defying supporters who fear it will
lead to Israel's giving up most of the territory. (OCR, 6/5/02, News 13) .....
To protect Israel from West Bank suicide bombers, Israel started a 75-mile electronic
fence, costing $2 million per mile. Eventually the fence will be 215
miles. No suicide bombers have come from Gaza, which is fenced in. (OCR,
6/17/02, News 9) ..... Israel is building 300-yard wide buffer
zones around some of the Jewish
settlements to make it harder for Palestinian attackers to infiltrate. (OCR,
12/27/02, News 36) ..... Sharon said, "Tens of thousands of Arabs had
been infiltrating illegally into Israel and has to be stopped. ... Arafat's
strategy is to make terror part of political negotiation. ... The security
fence, when it is finished, will close off this strategy. Losing this
negotiating weapon bothers them." (OCR, 7/31/03, Local 9) .....
"The plan to erect a security barrier between Israel and the West Bank is
popular in Israel as a way to block suicide bombers. No
Palestinian bombers have come from the Gaza Strip, which is fenced."
(OCR, 9/15/03, News 11) ..... Israel should complete the fence to stop suicide
bombers, or nothing serious will happen with the peace process. (USN&WR,
9/29/03, 67) ..... To stop Palestinian suicide bombers, Israel had built almost
100 miles of security fence, that
eventually will be up to 400 miles. The Gaza Strip has been fenced for years,
and no suicide bombers have crossed that fence. (OCR, 10/1/03, News 17) .....
Sharon said that the Palestinians must halt terrorist groups in the next few
months or he will unilaterally partition the land along the security
fence, whose construction will be greatly accelerated. (OCR, 12/19/03,
News 29) ..... The security fence may be renamed the "Terror Prevention
Fence." (OCR, 1/16/04, News 16) ..... Sunday's double bombing at Ashdod
port, some 16 miles north of Gaza, dealt a new blow to Israel's sense of
security because Palestinian attackers managed to sneak out of the fenced-in
Gaza Strip for the first time in more than three years of conflict. (Reuters,
3/16/04) ..... Military officials said there is concern that the bombers, a pair of
17-year-old high school students, used forged IDs and permits to get through the
Erez crossing between Gaza and Israel. A militant leader in Gaza said he
believed the bombers crawled through tunnels. (AP, 3/16/04) .....
Israel's main concern is keeping Palestinian attackers out. About 100 suicide
bombers have infiltrated Israel from the West Bank in more than four years of
conflict, but the current, relatively simple fence around Gaza has prevented
most infiltrations by armed Palestinians. The military laid out its plans for
the new barrier, including new army bases and 22-foot concrete walls around
nearby Israeli communities to stop Palestinian sniper fire. The new
Gaza barrier draws on experience from the West Bank barrier Israel is
building and the high-tech border fence with Lebanon, the army said, but it will
be more advanced. Palestinians trying to infiltrate into Israel - like a
would-be suicide bomber who managed to penetrate the old fence with wire cutters
last week before being captured - will first encounter fence made of coils of
razor wire. They would then have to cross a patrol road before reaching the
current barrier, a fence with electronic sensors that sends a signal to a
central command whenever it is touched or cut. If they pass this barrier, they
would have to traverse a 130-yard swath of land - codenamed Hoover - filled with
motion sensors and scanned by an array of day and night optical devices, before
reaching the third and newest electronic fence. Watchtowers armed with
remote-controlled machine guns are to be built every 1.2 miles and within a
year, remote-controlled, unmanned vehicles will begin patrolling the area.
Running about 35 miles around the seaside territory, the new barrier will cost
about $220 million and will be completed by mid-2006, military officials said.
(AP, 7/28/05)
There is only one
course for Israel. That is to continue building its defensive
physical barrier between itself and the West Bank. In a recent poll, 59
percent of Palestinians wanted to see terrorism against Israel continue, even
after the creation of a Palestinian state, and in all of the territories,
including East Jerusalem. Only 26 percent wanted to give up the armed struggle.
Israelis have concluded that the reason the Palestinians reject peace is not
because Jews live in the West Bank city of Hebron but because they live in Tel
Aviv and Haifa. The Palestinian leaders have made no bones about it. Their own
magazine stated long ago their aim clearly: "Not to impose our will on the
enemy but to destroy him in order to take his place." Palestinians have few
qualms in admitting that the original accord negotiated in Oslo was worse than a
sham. The bloody bookends are a statement--within days of the signing by
Arafat--that Oslo was part of the "plan of stages" to destroy Israel
and the June 24, 2001, affirmation by the relatively moderate Faisal Husseini
that the Oslo agreement constituted a "Trojan horse," whose pure
essence was deception. The fence would transform the Israeli role from that of
fighting terrorists in the West Bank to preventing terrorists from breaching the
security fence. This would make it possible for the Israelis to withdraw their
soldiers from the West Bank, to end their roadblocks, and give up their
remaining responsibility over the Palestinian population. Thus, the Palestinians
would lose the propaganda benefit of TV pictures of the Israeli Army in the West
Bank. (USN&WR,
12/15/03, 72) ..... "The wall will encompass less than 10 percent of the
West Bank, and leave 99.4% of the
Palestinian population on the east side." (USN&WR, 5/3/04, 76)
..... Israelis have discovered that they have the resources to wage
war against terrorism, including the determination to complete the
security barrier that saves lives. Israel has put down the intefada the old way,
by fighting back. (OCR, 7/23/04, Local 9) ..... The facts are
conclusive: Before the fence was
erected, the average number of terrorist attacks was 26 per year. Since its
partial construction, the number has dropped to three per year, while the death
toll has dropped by over 70 percent from 103 to 28, and the number of injured
has dropped by more than 80 percent, from an annual average of 628 to 83.
Terrorist penetration into Israel from the northern West Bank, where the initial
portion of the fence was completed, has dropped from 600 a year to zero--as
Israel was able to foil every suicide bombing originating from the northern West
Bank and specifically from the cities of Nablus and Jenin, areas that had
previously been infamous for exporting suicide bombers. Under the new court ruling, about 75 percent of
Israeli settlers would be incorporated into roughly 8 percent of the West Bank
on the Israeli side of the barrier. Fewer than 1 percent (13,000) of West Bank
Palestinians would be stranded in these Israeli areas, while over 99 percent
(1,970,000) would be left in the approximately 92 percent of the West Bank on
the other side of the fence, which would be a contiguous area. Building a fence
is a civilized way for a nation to defend itself. The U.N. built a fence in NY
to protect itself. India built a 460-mile barrier in Kashmir to contain
terrorist infiltration from Pakistan, and is building an
Israeli-like fence to stop Muslim terrorists coming in from Bangladesh.
Saudi Arabia build a 60-mile barrier to stop smuggling of weapons from Yemen.
Morocco and Turkey have built fences. (USN&WR,
8/2/04, 88) [The great wall of China was built for protection.]
Gaza was fenced in 1994; since 2001 not one suicide bomber has
entered Israel. The new security fence in northern West Bank has reduced attacks
from 59 to 3 in the same month period, a year apart. Captured Arab infiltrators
confirmed the fence blocked them, and they had to go south to an unfenced part
to enter Israel. 83% of Israelis favor construction of the fence. (USN&WR, 2/23/04, 88)
| Sharon's most ambitious construction scheme
is a 150-mile security barrier
currently going up along the Green Line that divides Israel and the West Bank.
(Newsweek, 6/9/03, 33) (pictures too)
About 70 miles of the 370-mile fence have been built. The average width is 198
to 330 feet. The fence is composed of razor-wire coils, 13-foot trench, patrol
road, path for detecting footprints, 10-foot high fence with electronic sensors,
13-foot trench, razor-wire coils. (OCR, 7/30/03, News 13) (picture below)

|
 |
 |
SEPARATE: This
aerial view shows Israel's separation barrier running between an Israeli
town (bottom) and a Palestinian one (top), just south of the West Bank
town of Qalqilya
(AP, 2/27/06)
|
Ethnic
violence erupted in Cypress in December 1963, three years after independence
from Britain. The violence escalated until 1974, when Greece attempted to make
Cypress a part of Greece. Turkey invaded, resulting in 6700 dead or missing, and
215,000 displaced on both sides. 35,000 Turkish troops partitioned Cypress, with
1/3 going to the Turks, who were 25% of the population. An uneasy peace
has existed since then. Now, 27 years later, serious talks are underway to
resolve the differences, form one nation, and join the European Union. (LAT,
1/16/02, A1) [An example for mideast peace: partition,
cooling off period, serious peace negotiations?] ..... Talks to reunify Cypress
are deadlocked, with Turkey threatening to annex the Turkish area. (OCR,
6/14/02, News 38)
The
Hefer Valley is a narrow nine-mile wide strip of land where Israelis are
squeezed between between the Palestinian West Bank and the Mediterranean Sea. A
thick concrete wall, 8 feet high and one mile long, separates an Israeli town
(Bat Hefer) and a Palestinian city (Tulkarm), about one mile apart. The wall is
being extended 600 yards with a 10.5-foot high fence. An electric fence, with
surveillance cameras, also is being installed. (LAT, 9/10/01, A1) ..... Palestinian
gunmen evaded an electric fence and night-vision equipment to attack a heavily
fortified army base in southern Gaza. Three Israelis were killed and seven
wounded, before two gunmen were killed. (LAT, 8/26/01, A1) ..... In the 10
cease-fires since 1993, Hamas used the time to regroup and rearm. Hamas recently
said that they reject a two-state solution and there can be no compromise. The
security fence is in response to 1000 days of terrorism and 800 deaths, mostly
women and children. The fence is needed because the Palestinians refuse to live
in peace. Not one suicide bomber has come from the fenced-in Gaza Strip,
compared to 300 from the West bank with no fence. Israel had to fence its
borders with Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. U.S. has fenced parts of the Mexican
border. There is a wall between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. (USN&WR,
8/11/03, 60) ..... American troops in Iraq are enclosing entire villages in
barb wire, demolishing buildings, imprisoning relatives. The counterinsurgency
campaign is similar to that used by Israel. (OCR, 12/7/03, News 27) ..... Fences
of razor wire, watch towers, and minefields separate Israel from its other
neighbors Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. But most of the 320 km (200 mile) border
with Egypt is literally just a line in the sand. At least seven militants
from the Gaza Strip have slipped into Israel by way of Sinai. Three gunmen, and
an Israeli army patrolman, were killed in ensuing clashes -- prompting Israel to
set up an airborne special forces unit that is always on standby. The other
militants were arrested. (Sex, Flies and Videotape on Sinai Smuggling Routes, by
Dan Williams, Reuters, 8/26/04)
JERUSALEM (06/17/05, AP) - Israeli Navy building a sea
barrier to keep out Gaza attackers, The Israeli navy is building a sea
barrier off the coast of northern Gaza to keep out potential attackers once
Israel pulls out of the coastal strip this summer. The navy concluded the
barrier, stretching 950 meters (yards) into the sea, is necessary because of the
loss of surveillance systems in the planned pullout. Designed to keep potential
attackers from swimming to the Israeli coast, the barrier's first hundred meters
(yards) will consist of cement pilings buried into the sandy bottom; the
structure will extend another 800 meters (yards) in the form of 1.8-meter-deep
fence floating beneath the surface. The navy is also refurbishing its radar
system at the Erez Crossing between Gaza and Israel. Construction of the new sea
barrier will begin soon and that it will be a major project costing millions of
dollars. The barrier is not expected to be complete in time for Israel's planned
withdrawal from Gaza, set to begin in mid-August. Gaza, home to 1.3 million
Palestinians, is surrounded by an Israeli fence built to keep back attackers and
which prevents Gazans from being able to come and go. Israel is also building a
barrier between itself and the West Bank. ..... A Palestinian suicide bomber
attacked a bakery in this southern Israeli resort town on Monday, killing three
people and himself, police said. It was the first
suicide bombing in Israel in nine months and the first ever to hit Eilat,
Israel's southernmost city. It was the first suicide bombing in Israel
since last April, when a bomber struck a Tel Aviv restaurant, killing 12 people.
Suicide bombings were at their
height four years ago, when hundreds of Israelis were killed in dozens of
attacks. (AP, 1/29/07) http://www.wkrn.com/nashville/news/ap-suicide-bomber-kills-at-israeli-bakery/74361.htm
"Today there is no [peace] process and no hope, said
Dennis Ross, long time American mediator in the middle east. "What we're
facing is not even an attempt to defeat the other side, but a kind of
exhaustion. Israel doesn't think it has a partner for peace any more. It just
wants to be done with it, just to build a high
wall." (OCR, 8/12/01, News
12) [Turkey was condemned for partitioning Cyprus in 1974. It may have been unfair and
wrong, but it seems to have stopped the fighting there.] ..... Ariel Sharon said
that Israel would create buffer zones
to achieve security separation from the Palestinians, and any Palestinian
state be demilitarized. (OCR, 2/22/02, News 23) ..... Cyprus reunification talks
failed when Turkey demanded full recognition of Turkish Cyprus and Greece
demanded that refugees be allowed to return to their homes. (OCR, 3/11/03, News
15)
| For Israel, the barrier is a 'life and
death' issue |
|
Israelis call it a "security fence." Palestinians call it
an "apartheid wall." Call it what you like, Israeli officials
say, but the barrier has been a effective means of warding off suicide
bombings.
"The fence is a success story and the fence is saving lives. In
areas where the fence has gone up, there has been something like a 90-percent
success rate in stopping suicide penetration," says Mark Regev,
spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry. "In
2006, we've had fewer successful suicide bombings than we had in one week
in 2002. That's in large part because of the fence."
In response to new information indicating that the barrier's route
was motivated by the demographic struggle that is one of the underpinnings
of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Mr. Regev says that it is natural
that the mappers of the barrier took Israel's concerns about a rising Arab
population into consideration. "The government's positioning of the
fence does take into account demographic realities, topographical
realities, and security concerns," Regev says. "The object of
the fence is to have as many Israeli citizens as possible protected by the
fence."
Regardless of the route, he adds, Israel is bound to be the subject
of criticism here.
"If this were a land grab, then we should have included all of
Shuafat in the area of the fence," he says. "Look at Jerusalem.
If we put areas of East Jerusalem inside the fence, we're accused of
annexing Jerusalem. But if we leave them out, we're cutting off
Palestinians from their brothers on the other side of the fence. I think
the arguments about the route tend to be disingenuous."
"The route can be changed, and one day when there's peace, the
fence will come down," Regev says. "This is the fence that is
designed to keep suicide bombers out. We have an obligation to let people
pass through it and that's why there are gates in the fence."
The Israeli government calls the barrier a fence, he says, because
more than 90 percent of the route from north to south is made of fencing.
The difficulties it causes, he says, pale in comparison with its success.
"We understand that there has been a negative impact on the
quality of life, and it's our obligation to do everything we can to
minimize that negative impact," he says. "But we're talking
about a quality of life issue, while on my side of the fence, it's a life
and death issue."
|

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1219/p01s04a-wome.htm
(CSM, 12/19/06)

Palestinian Suicide Attacks Since 2001
-- During more than six years of Palestinian-Israeli violence, 540
people have been killed in 130 Palestinian suicide bombings. Some
of the deadliest suicide attacks in Israel:
_ Jan. 29, 2007: A bombing at a bakery in the southern town of Eilat
kills three.
_ April 17, 2006: A bombing kills 11 Israelis in Tel Aviv.
_ Dec. 5, 2005: An attacker kills five at a shopping mall in the
coastal town of Netanya.
_ Oct. 26, 2005: A bomber kills five people at a falafel stand in
Hadera.
_ July 12, 2005: Bombing kills five at a shopping mall in Netanya.
_ Feb. 25, 2005: In the first attack after a truce, a bomber blows
himself up in crowd near a nightclub in Tel Aviv, killing four.
_ Aug. 31, 2004: Two bombers set off explosives in buses in Beersheba,
killing 16.
_ March 14, 2004: Two bombers attack Ashdod port, killing 10.
_ Jan. 29, 2004: Bomber on a bus on Gaza Street in Jerusalem kills 11
people.
_ Oct. 4, 2003: Bomber kills 19 people at a seaside restaurant in
Haifa.
_ Sept. 9, 2003: A bomber kills eight Israeli soldiers at a bus stop
near an army base outside Tel Aviv.
_ Aug. 19, 2003: A bomber blows up a bus in Jerusalem, killing 23
people.
_ June 11, 2003: A bus bombing on central Jerusalem's Jaffa Street
kills 17.
_ March 5, 2003: A bombing on a bus in Haifa kills 17 people.
_ Jan. 5, 2003: Two bombers strike the Neve Shaanan pedestrian mall in
Tel Aviv, killing 23.
_ Oct. 21, 2002: A bombing on a bus in northern Israel kills 14
people.
_ June 18, 2002: A bomber kills 19 in southern Jerusalem.
_ June 5, 2002: A bus bombing near Megiddo Junction in northern Israel
kills 17.
_ May 7, 2002: A bomb attack at a pool hall in the Tel Aviv suburb of
Rishon Letzion kills 15.
_ March 31, 2002: A bomber kills 15 at a restaurant in Haifa.
_ March 27, 2002: An attacker kills 29 people in Netanya during a
ritual Seder meal at a hotel dining room at the start of Passover.
_ March 9, 2002: A bomber kills 11 at Jerusalem's Moment Cafe.
_ March 2, 2002: An attack kills 11 in Jerusalem's ultra-Orthodox Mea
Shearim neighborhood.
_ Dec. 2, 2001: A bomber kills 15 on a bus in Haifa.
_ Dec. 1, 2001: Two bombers strike Jerusalem's Ben Yehuda pedestrian
mall, killing 11.
_ Aug. 9, 2001: An attack at a Sbarro pizzeria in Jerusalem kills 15.
_ June 1, 2001: A bomber kills 21 people, mostly teenagers, at a
seaside disco in Tel Aviv.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/29/AR2007012900703_2.html
(AP, 1/29/07)

SECURITY FENCE RESULTS
Firstly, there was less violence, both between Israelis and Palestinians,
and between Palestinians and Palestinians, than there had been for years. Among
other landmarks, 2009 was the first year
in a long time without any successful suicide bombings against Israel.
Then, there was the strong economic growth in both Israel and the
Palestinian territories relative to most of the rest of the world, for which
2009 was a bleak year. (While Gaza is not undergoing the same kind of economic
growth enjoyed by the West Bank, the standard of living there is nonetheless
considerably better than you would suppose from the distorted picture provided
by certain partisan journalists and NGO workers, and much better then in many
other areas of the world.) And most importantly, 2009 was the year that a Likud
Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, not only recognized the principle of an
independent Palestinian state, but also made the most sweeping freeze on Israeli
settlement-building in the West Bank since 1967.
Every informed observer knows that for a realistic two-state solution to
be achieved, Israel cannot return to what Abba Eban famously referred to as
Israel's "Auschwitz borders" (i.e., borders that were indefensible),
and that there will be land swaps between Israelis and Palestinians so final
borders will more closely reflect demographic and security considerations.
Indeed as long ago as 1967, the international diplomats who carefully crafted
U.N. Resolution 242 acknowledged that the 1967
borders would not and should not necessarily constitute Israel's final
boundaries. They made clear in the wording of their text that they
believed that not all of the land previously occupied by Jordan (land that has
come to be known as the West Bank) should necessarily be relinquished by Israel.
(Wall Street Journal, 1/27/10)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703906204575027383170233218.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Arafat,
Hamas, and terrorism 
Arafat
wants
all the land taken by Israel in the 1967 war to be placed under Palestinian
control. Sharon is less concerned about a belief in Israel's birthright to the
land, but more about a cold appraisal of security and resource needs, and a
pessimistic view of the possibility of reconciliation with Arab neighbors. (OCR,
10/12/01, News 38) ..... "The Palestinians who claim that every inch of the
West Bank must be returned should learn some history, The world is full of
territory lost by those who start and then lose wars. The
Arabs have no right to the land they lost
by their own folly. ..... Israel cannot trust Arafat as a negotiator and must
see to its own security. A
fence
and separation for a generation seem the best chance." (OCR,
4/21/02, Commentary 1) ..... Yasser Arafat "saw the Oslo peace accord not
as a means to a two-state solution but as a means to the substitution of a
Palestinian state for the State of Israel." "Arafat violated most of
the essential elements of Oslo, inciting Palestinians to hatred while erecting
and empowering a murderous terrorist network." (USN&WR, 7/12/04,
140)
The terrorists
understand only the language of force and can be stopped only by means of force.
There can be no appeasing of terrorists and no apologies for states like Syria
that coddle them. Abu Mazen refuses to rein in the Palestinian Authority's
anti-Semitic, anti-Israel rhetoric that spews endlessly from TV and other public
platforms. Listen to the words of hate, and you'd never guess there's a
cease-fire in place. Palestinian rhetoric leaves no lines to which Israelis can
withdraw from the collective Palestinian desire to annihilate
the Jewish state. Hezbollah, is sponsoring most of the terrorist activity
in the West Bank. Like Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah has headquarters in Lebanon and
Damascus and is, thus, less susceptible to Israeli pressure. Supported by Iran
and Syria, Hezbollah recently increased the bounty for spilling Jewish blood
from $5,000 to $20,000. (USN&WR, 3/14/05, 72) ..... GAZA - Hamas militants said
they would not disarm despite Israel's planned Gaza pullout, so they could carry on their fight against the Jewish state.
Hamas, sworn to Israel's
destruction, made clear it has not budged from its historic goal of a creating an Islamic state that would encompass not only the West Bank and Gaza Strip but also what is now Israel. "We will draw the map of Palestine from the sea to the river and from Lebanon to Egypt." (Reuters, 08/12/05)
Palestinians will have to detoxify their society before
anything like a real peace can exist. Too many Palestinians have devoted
themselves for far too long not to the creation of a two-state solution but to
the eradication of one state and
one people: Israel and the Jews. Arafat
made moderation synonymous with treason. He established a cult of total victory
and a culture of hatred toward Israel; he legitimized terrorism and suicide
bombings; he used the mosques, the media, and the schools to instill his animus
in his people, even among the youngest children. A temporary cease-fire is no
solution. It will simply raise Israeli suspicions that time is being bought to
give Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades a respite to rebuild
their arsenals. None of them will forswear the destruction of Israel. Why?
Simply because terrorist groups are rarely, if ever, truly neutralized unless
they are disbanded and disarmed, for their credo is "I kill, therefore I
am." Abu Mazen is also a
Holocaust denier who asserts that the Temple never existed in Jerusalem. He
supported Arafat when he rejected the Camp David proposals four years ago. Abu
Mazen mouthed Arafat's doctrines, including a pledge to return all of
Palestinian refugees, now totaling 4 million, to the pre-1948 original home of
their ancestors in Israel and to oust Israel from all of the West Bank. The
"right of return," he said, was a nonnegotiable prerequisite. The
implementation of this demand would destroy the Jewish character of Israel and
is clearly a nonstarter. Abu Mazen has attacked Israelis as "Zionist
enemies" and vowed that he would not only never attack members of Hamas,
Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and al-Aqsa but defend them instead. Palestinians see
Abu Mazen as a member of the old guard, the Tunis thugocracy that came to
Palestine and became rich men. (USN&WR,
1/24/05, 60)
Yasser Arafat was personally responsible for the murder of eleven Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics; he directed the execution of two American diplomats in Sudan; he masterminded the cold-blooded murder of 25 people – 21 of them children – in Ma’alot, a city in northern Israel; he authorized the takeover of the Italian cruise ship ACHILLE LAURO, and the murder of a wheelchair-bound American citizen. He was the originator of the infamous crime of suicide bombings and brought it to a horrified world. He was the inventor of the hijacking and bombing of airplanes that killed thousands. And that is just the tip of the evil iceberg. Arafat rejected a more than generous offer that gave virtually everything he ever demanded, except the “right of return” of the descendants of the Palestinian “refugees,” which would have been the end of the Jewish state. Arafat decided instead to start his bloody “intifada,” which by now has cost over 1,000 Jewish lives – and three times as many Arab lives and untold thousands wounded on both sides. The Palestinian economy is in ruins. More than one-half of its population is without work; famine would be rampant were it not for the constant infusion of cash by the U.S. and other western countries (most of it pilfered by Arafat and his cohorts and stashed in secret accounts all over the world). But the greatest harm, the greatest crime that Arafat committed was to poison the minds of two generations of Palestinian Arabs against Israel and against the Jews. Evil propaganda permeates all Palestinian media. Palestinian children, beginning with pre-school, learn to hate Jews and Israel, and to become “shahids” – martyrs and suicide bombers. The State of Israel does not appear in Arab textbooks; the area is described as “Occupied Palestine.” Even with the best effort, it may take at least two generations to change that mind set.
It seems almost incredible and a cruel joke that such a man, such a fiend, would have received the Nobel Peace Prize and that presidents, prime ministers and secretaries of state of major countries would have attended this man’s funeral in Cairo.
Arafat left his people and the territory that the Israelis had generously yielded to him in a shambles. He refused to create any institutions that could possibly become precursors to a government. He looted the treasury that foreign countries – mostly, of course, the United States – had generously provided for the welfare of his constituents. He implanted hate and poisoned the minds of his people. His main interest never seems to have been the creation of a Palestinian state; his primary goal, ceaselessly pursued, was the destruction of Israel. With that heritage, it will take a very long time, if it can ever happen at all, that peace between Arabs and Jews can come about.
http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_89.html
JERUSALEM (09/09/05, AP) - Arafat's Death Remains a Mystery.
Newly revealed medical records have failed to solve the mystery of Yasser Arafat's death, although they do cast doubt on popular conspiracy theories about poisoning or rumors of AIDS. But the main question - what led to the massive stroke that killed the longtime Palestinian leader - may never be answered. Arafat, 75, died Nov. 11, 2004, in a French military hospital near Paris after a sudden, rapid decline in his health. Arafat's wife, Suha, refused an autopsy and Palestinian leaders have never given a definitive cause of death. French doctors who treated Arafat concluded he died of a "massive brain hemorrhage" after suffering intestinal inflammation, jaundice and a blood condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation, or DIC. But the records are inconclusive about what brought about DIC, which has numerous causes ranging from infections to colitis to liver disease. Since Arafat's death, rumors have swirled throughout the Middle East that Arafat died from either AIDS or poisoning. Many Palestinian officials insist that Israeli agents somehow poisoned him. Poisoning was highly unlikely; toxicology studies done by the French doctors were negative and said Arafat did not suffer extensive kidney and liver damage typical of poisoning. Arafat's condition improved in the hospital and that he was able to walk and talk before slipping into a coma Nov. 3. Such improvement would make poisoning unlikely. An unidentified Israeli infectious-diseases expert as criticized the French medical team for not testing for AIDS. But the expert said after studying the records, AIDS was unlikely due to the sudden onset of an intestinal illness.
For two decades, Hezbollah's Islamic fanatics have been a foreign legion for Iran in Lebanon, dedicated to hate and violence. When thousands of them cried, "Death to America! Death to America!" in response to a speech last year by Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah's leader, they meant it. Before 9/11, Hezbollah was responsible for more American casualties than any other terrorist organization.
What of the civilian deaths, exemplified by the tragedy of Qana? A truer picture is summarized by a cartoon showing an Israeli soldier standing defensively in front of a baby carriage, while a soldier of Hezbollah fires at Israel from the other side of the baby carriage. To kill Israelis, Hezbollah cynically hides behind women and children, just as it deliberately dug bunkers in the crowded suburbs of Beirut. Yet these abuses don't attract much international condemnation, especially from the anti-Israel United Nations. It is only luck and tough security measures that have prevented large-scale Israeli tragedies. By contrast, Israel warns the Lebanese population in advance of attacks and urges people to leave the area. Warnings preceded the bombing of the Hezbollah rocket site in Qana--which is still a mystery. The building collapse came seven hours after the bomb fell on or near it. If the blast was perceived as a danger, why didn't Hezbollah or the Lebanese get the civilians out? Hezbollah has clearly violated the most basic laws of war, including the Geneva Conventions, which require parties to a conflict to "avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas" and state that "the presence of a protected person [i.e., a civilian] may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations."The Geneva Conventions also forbid exactly what Hezbollah was doing at Qana, that is, concealing weaponry among civilians, as revealed in video footage from an Israeli drone showing a Hezbollah rocket launcher firing from a spot directly adjacent to the building struck in Qana. Israeli forces didn't know that dozens of civilians had found refuge there. Hezbollah did when it set up its rocket launcher there. International law is not a suicide pact.
(8/6/06) http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/articles/060806/14edit_3.htm
Israel pulled out of Gaza more than a year ago, but instead of using their independence to build a Palestinian state, the Gaza Arabs have been killing each other, as well as trying to kill Israelis. Factional fighting between
Hamas forces loyal to Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and the Fatah forces more or less loyal to President Mahmoud Abbas verges on a civil war. The turmoil will threaten Israel, which cannot be expected to stand aside as it did to its cost in southern Lebanon while Hezbollah grew strong enough to rocket Israeli cities. In Gaza, every intelligence, police, military, and security agency predicted violence if the security of the Gaza-Egypt border, the Philadelphia Route, was left to those parties when Israel withdrew. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice forced the Israelis to agree to the deal-and the border has indeed become a sewer for terrorists and weapons. The Egyptians have betrayed their obligations, even though Hamas is a threat to Egypt. The Israeli Defense Forces have discovered as many as 100 transborder tunnels, through which some 20 tons of explosives, tens of thousands of rifles, RPGs, rockets, and missiles of all kinds have been shipped. The Gazans have made matters worse by building hundreds of short-range Kassam rockets to rain on southern Israel. None of this is in the interest of the people of Gaza. Their vote for Hamas back in January has brought anarchy, corruption, chaos, and tribal wars. Abdallah Awad, columnist for the Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam, writes: "The factions, which not long ago were, in the eyes of the public, the guarantee for ridding ourselves of the occupation and for freedom and independence, have become ... another occupation, more repressive than the [Israeli] occupation itself." Hamas simply isn't interested in peace; in the latest survey, two thirds of Gazans reject peace with Israel while almost as many believe in shelling Israeli cities. Hamas ensures further bloodshed by indoctrinating Palestinian children. They are not born hating, but from the age of 3 their radical leadership incites them to murder. The hate pervades the educational system, TV broadcasting, summer camps, children's trading cards, movies, music, even games that make martyrdom a major theme. A Palestinian psychiatrist recently reported that over half the Palestinian children between the ages of 6 and 11 dream of becoming suicide bombers. And in this perverse and tragic pursuit, they are urged on by their prime minister, Haniyeh. "One of the signs of victory," he told a rally recently, "is the Palestinian mother who prepares her son to be a warrior and then receives the news of his death for the sake of Allah with cries of happiness." Hamas prefers to let the Gazans suffer in the hope that sympathy for the victims of its own intransigence trump reason and sound judgment. Hamas, in truth, is not a nationalist force. It is part of the global movement of jihad, a Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood founded in Egypt with the goal of eliminating Israel with help from its Syrian and Iranian backers. Middle East diplomats, so enamored of process, keep hoping the right dose of concessions will somehow result in mutually reinforcing perceptions of security. This is hopelessly naive. For now and the foreseeable future, the seat on the other side of the table across from Israel is occupied only by a death's-head.
(11/5/06) http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/articles/061105/13edit_2.htm
A
captured Hamas leader, who recruited and trained Palestinian suicide bombers,
said they could strike anywhere and anytime they wanted. He claimed that most
Palestinians would be willing to sacrifice their lives to accomplish their goal
to destroy Israel. They are promised martyrdom, which includes everlasting happiness
with 70 virgin wives. (CBS, Sixty Minutes, 8/19/01) ..... Hamas,
sworn to wipe
out Israel,
wants the Jewish state and the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip for a
future Palestinian state run in accordance with Islamic
law.
(Reuters, 03/25/04 11:10 ET) ..... Islamic
terrorists in suicide missions are told they will be rewarded in heaven with 72
virgin brides. However, females are promised little rewards, possibly explaining
why so few volunteer. (USN&WR, 2/25/02, 6) ..... UCLA Islamic Law Prof.
Khaled Abou El Fadl said that studies of the Koran suggest that the rewards for
martyrdom should actually be translated as "raisons,"
not "virgins."
(USN&WR, 4/15/02, 36) More complete info at http://win4sports.com/terror.htm#virgins
..... Despite past feuds, Hamas
now is allied with (PLO) Fatah. Hamas' goal is the
eradication
of Israel
as a Jewish
state, dismantling of Jewish settlements, return of 4 million Palestine
refugees, establishment of Islamic state with Islamic law. (OCR, 4/4/02, News 7)
..... Hamas repeated "its demand that all of historic Palestine - including
all of
modern-day Israel - should be in Arab hands."
(OCR, 8/23/02, News 40) ..... Dogs are a new weapon against terrorists. Dogs can
detect bombs from surprising distances. "Islamic radicals believe that dogs
are dirty, and if Fido's blood is mixed with that of a 'martyr,' he will not
ascend to paradise and win his 72
virgins.
As a result, some officials want to place
dogs at sites most threatened
by suicide bombers." (USN&WR, 9/29/03, 2) ..... Hamas leader Ahmed
Yassen said that Muslims will defeat America, and those carrying bombs and
blowing themselves up (suicide
attackers)
are destined for paradise. (OCR, News 15, 9/25/03)
Hamas
teaches children to hate Jews. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTGbP55HGi8
There are one million male
students studying in Pakistan's 10,000 mostly militant Islamic religious
schools. The students range from 8 to 35 years, are
taught to hate
and kill
Americans, and many become
Pecharich terrorists.
(Reader's Digest, 1/02, 70) ..... "More than a million of the
[Palestinian] refugees from the 1948 war live in 59 camps scattered throughout
the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. The camps have supplied most of
the fighters willing to kill themselves." (OCR, 3/10/02, News 4) ..... On
3/9/77, About a dozen armed Hanafi Muslims invaded three buildings in Washington
D.C., killing one person and taking more than 130 hostages. The siege ended two
days later. (OCR, 3/9/02, Accent 7)
Three
14-year old Gaza male classmates left suicide notes about martyrdom,
attacked a Jewish settlement in Gaza with homemade pipe bombs, and were killed.
Interviewed Palestinians blamed the deaths on Israel for causing a sense of
hopelessness and traumatizing the boys. [The Palestinians refuse to accept any
responsibility for the deaths of the boys. The boys have been taught in school
to hate the Jews, that Israel must be destroyed, and to die for the cause leads
to martyrdom. Either the Palestinians are lying to us, lying to themselves, or
both.] (OCR, 4/25/02, News 21) ..... "The Arab world seethes with hatred
of the Jews
as rabid as the Nazi's. ... it is the Arab world that preaches 'Kill the Jews!'
and dances in the street when terrorists do so." (OCR, 9/29/02, Commentary
6)
"Ahmed Tibi, a former
advisor to Arafat and now a member of Israel's parliament, accused Arab states
of hypocrisy when they cite Palestinian corruption as an obstacle to financial
aid. Many of the regions other leaders are every bit as corrupt, he said."
(L. A. Times, 3/27/01, A4) ..... Bush urged Arafat to purge his
administration of the corruption
that is the source of much criticism from Palestinians themselves. European
leaders echoed those comments. (OCR, 5/3/02, News 4) ..... "Palestinians
resume their calls for democratic reform and an end in what is widely seen as
rampart corruption." (OCR,
5/14/02, News 11) ..... Israel estimates that Arafat's
personal property is worth $2 billion. (Newsweek, 1/27/03, 46) [Rags
to riches!] ..... For ten years it has been alleged that Arafat, and a few close
advisors, have diverted millions of dollars to secret bank accounts. The
Palestinian Authority's first public accounting claims it has $600 million in
liquid assets. (OCR, 3/1/03, News 38) ..... Arafat
has violated every agreement he has made. Arab leaders also have stopped
trusting him. (USN&WR, 9/29/03, 68) .....
Arafat
appropriates $800M,
By
the JPost.com Staff November 7, 2003 The CBS-News program 60 minutes will report
Sunday that PA Chairman Yasser Arafat
has diverted $800 million to his private accounts
from Palestinian Authority aid money. According to the report, Arafat continues
to send his wife Suha an additional $100,000 – also from PA aid funds – each
month to Paris, where she lives with their daughter. PA Finance Minister, Salam
Fayad is currently tracking down missing PA finances, and is reported to have
assisted CBS in their report. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1068185482292
Arafat's principal legacy is hate, his gift to the world a kind of terrorism whose techniques have been aped from Indonesia to Iraq. Arafat was resolute in refusing to prepare his people for peace. He used every platform--radio, TV, newspapers, the mosques, schools, even summer camps for kids--to inculcate a hatred of Jews, Israel, and the West. The Jews, Arafat declared, "never lived in or ruled Palestine.
They were relying on false mythological sources," i.e., the Bible. Canaan, for Arafat, was not the Promised Land for Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and their descendants; it was the land of banishment. For good measure, he added that "there was no temple in Jerusalem," thus denying that Jesus ever walked there, preached there, or was crucified there. A Palestinian poll in Gaza asked whether rockets and mortar attacks on Israeli towns should continue even after Israel's full withdrawal: 51 percent approved of more attacks. Only 42 percent said no. A couple of years ago, another poll found only 26 percent of Palestinians favored stopping terrorist attacks--even if they were to receive all of the West Bank and Gaza, East Jerusalem, and sovereignty over the Temple Mount. Hundreds of millions of dollars
Arafat received to improve life for Palestinians were diverted to support a terrorist network. Now the Palestinians are to be guided, it appears, by some 10 feuding groups and their warlords who have about 40,000 guns (to say nothing of the criminal gangs that control swaths of the West Bank and Gaza).
(USN&WR, 11/29/04, 68)
Yasser
Arafat ‘has £1.8bn fortune’ A TELEVISION
documentary is to claim that Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian president, has
amassed a personal fortune of up to £1.8bn and his wife is given tens of
thousands of pounds each week to fund a lavish lifestyle in Paris. The
£1.8bn estimate of Arafat's personal fortune is almost six times higher than
had been previously been touted. According to a report in the New York Daily
News, the CBS show 60 Minutes will claim on Sunday that he has amassed a
personal fortune of between £602m and £1.8bn. It will also claim that Arafat's
wife, Suha, 40, who lives away from the struggles of her homeland, is given more
than £60,000 a month from Palestinian Authority funds.
Lesley Stahl, a CBS correspondent, told the
newspaper that Raymonda Tawil, Mrs Arafat's mother, is apparently enjoying life
in Paris at the expense of the Palestinian taxpayers. http://ww1.theherald.co.uk/news/4130-print.shtml
..... "Yasser Arafat has run a system built on corruption
and repression. His aids reap money from many sources in all corners of
the dirt-poor territories -- brazenly showing off their newfound wealth with
grand new homes and fancy cars. ... The most senior PA officials are stealing
the money that belongs to the people. ... hundreds of millions of dollars have
disappeared from the PA treasury." Palestinians are fed up with PA
repression, extortion, and demand for bribes. (USN&WR, 7/1/02, 16) [Many
horrifying examples in article.] ..... Arafat Fends Off Challenge Over
Reforms, By MOHAMMED DARAGHMEH, AP, RAMALLAH, West Bank (Aug. 26, 2004) -
Veteran Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat turned back another effort by critics
to force him to reform his bloated,
corruption-plagued administration. The recommendations included forming a
viable government capable of fighting corruption more effectively and restoring
law and order. It also called on Arafat to follow through on promises made in a
speech last week to crack down on graft. ..... Starting in 1979, Arab
countries gave the PLO about $200M per year for 10 years. They stopped when
Arafat supported Saddam Hussein, who gave $150M. From 1993 to 2000, Israel gave
about $4B in tax rebates to the PA. From 1994 to 2003, other countries donated
$6.5B to the PA. Thus, more than $12.5B
has been given to Arafat, who refuses
to give an accounting of his financial empire. Arafat's wealth is
estimated to be between $3B and $5B. When he was 62, he secretly married a
28-year-old woman. His wife flew to Paris to give birth because she said
conditions in Gaza were terrible. His wife and daughter live a lavish life style
in Paris on $100,000 per month. $11.4M allegedly was transferred to the wife's
bank account between 7/02 and 9/03. (OCR, 11/9/04, News 14) ..... The
Palestinian attorney general said that senior officials in the authority may
have stolen billions of dollars
of public funds. (OCR, 2/6/06, News 11)
On Sept. 9, 1993, Yasser Arafat
signed a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin pledging that the
Palestine Liberation Organization "recognizes the right of the State of
Israel to exist in peace and security." That was a lie.
The list of crimes the PLO chairman has incited or been associated with over the
years would stain every page of a good-sized book. Highlights, however, would
include the slaughter of athletes at the 1972 Olympics by Black September; the
assassination of U.S. diplomats in Sudan in 1973; the massacre of schoolchildren
at Maalot in 1974; a bus hijacking that killed 35 civilians in 1978; the slaying
of Leon Klinghoffer on the Achille Lauro in 1985; the torture and execution of
Palestinian dissidents, especially during the intifada of the late 1980s and
early '90s; and the suicide bombings of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade in more
recent years. Even those incidents provide but a flavor of Arafat's culpability
in the decades-long terrorism that sabotaged the likelihood of Middle East
peace. Given an opportunity in '93 to lead the Palestinians in setting up a
state of their own, Arafat botched it utterly, staffing a soon-to-be corrupt
Palestinian Authority with cronies and thugs. At every turn, meanwhile, he
walked away from the possibility of a settlement with Israel. Most notably in
the fall of 2000, he left on the table a two-state
solution that gave the Palestinians nearly everything they could realistically
expect in terms of territory and a capital in East Jerusalem. In the four
years of violence that have followed, Arafat has made no serious efforts to halt
suicide bombings against Israeli civilians or to rein in the violence that has
made a shambles of the economy. No doubt part of the reason for this feeble
performance is that his Fatah movement and the PA itself are implicated in the
attacks. (Rocky Mountain News, 11/5/04) ..... Arafat realized early that Arab
dictators would pay to keep the Palestinian issue alive because it gave
them an all-purpose diversion from the disaster they were wreaking on their own
societies. Arafat became the custodian of the Palestinian grievance for
everyone. (OCR, 11/5/04, Local 7) ..... "Arafat
has said he was born in Jerusalem, though biographers have concluded that his birthplace
was Cairo." (OCR, 11/6/04, News 4)
Marwan Barghouti, a senior
official in Arafat's Fatah movement, said, "I think that President Arafat
is not only supporting the uprising but also the leader of it." Israel has
long charged that Arafat has directed the violence. Arafat has denied that he is
behind attacks on Israelis by Palestinian militants and has suggested he is
doing everything he can to stop the violence. (LAT, 9/1/01, A4) ..... Netanyahu
said that Arafat
tells his people in Arabic every night that they ought to annihilate
the Jewish state.
He has violated dozens of cease-fires, using them just to rearm. (OCR, 4/4/02,
News 2) ..... President Bush said Arafat
has not earned his trust. "I mean, here's a man who said he has signed on
at Oslo that he was going to fight off terror. We thought we had a cease- fire
arranged. We were close to a cease-fire, and the next thing we know, there's a
suicide bomber that hits. We thought a couple of months ago that ... we had an
agreement. The next thing we know, he's ordered a shipment of arms from
Iran. He's got a long way to go." (OCR, 4/6/02, News 11) ..... After
Arafat
rejected Israel's offer at Camp David, he said, "Look, we've got 150
years, and we'll throw them into the sea." Arafat has lied about everything
and to everyone. Arafat's colleague Mazen Izz al-Din said on a PLO television
broadcast "One day history will expose the fact that the whole intifada and
its instructions came from Brother Commander Yasser Arafat." Dennis Ross
wrote that he never met an Arab leader that trusted Arafat. (USN&WR, 7/8/02,
68) ..... Arafat told Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci: "We don't
want peace. We want war, victory. Peace for us means the
destruction of Israel
and nothing else. " (USN&WR, 5/20/02, 60) ..... However,
Hamas will not oppose Palestinian statehood despite its announced desire to destroy
Israel, he said. "It is the right of Palestinian people to have a
state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Jerusalem." "What we
will not accept ... is if a state was (created) in return for giving up any of
the rights of the Palestinian people," Abu Marzouk said. Hamas says all of
Israel and occupied Palestinian territories belong to the Palestinians. He
warned that no Israeli would be safe until the Israeli government caves in.
(DAMASCUS, Dec 9, 2004, Reuters)
International human-rights group Human Rights Watch said
Palestinian suicide attacks
against Israeli civilians are "crimes against humanity" and Arafat
has not done enough to deter them. No Israeli military action or violations of
international law justified such attacks. (OCR, 11/3/02, News 29) ..... For 50
years, an idealistic Jewish group from Argentina,
believing in coexistence,
lived in a kibbutz in Israeli territory bordering the West Bank. Arabs from
neighboring villages shared meals and events with the settlers. The kibbutz even
offered their own land to be used in place of Arab land for a security zone. A
Palestinian gunman from an Arafat associated group infiltrated the kibbutz and
killed five, including a mother and her young sons (4 and 5). (OCR, 11/12/02,
News 11) ..... Palestinian gunmen in Gaza killed
a pregnant Israeli woman and her four young daughters
as they headed into Israel. (OCR, 5/2/04, News 9)
Arafat
"has shown a contempt for working democracy. Corruption and nepotism are
rampant ...... a judicial system is virtually nonexistent, most media are
state-controlled and the legislature is powerless." (LAT, 12/11/01,
A18) ..... "Yasser Arafat
denounced Israel on Friday night as a racist colonial power at a U.N. conference
on intolerance, just hours after one of his senior aids [Nabil Shaath] announced
that the Palestinians would reject a proposed declaration that labeled Israel as
a racist state." (OCR, 9/1/01, News 29) ..... Arafat
arrested two people for making explosives used in a 1996 attack. They were
allowed to make more explosives in jail, and were recently released so they
could make the bombs used in a terrorist attack on a pizzeria that killed 15
innocent civilians. (USN&WR, 3/25/02, 60) ..... One day before Arafat
condemned terror against civilians, his wife told an Arab-language magazine that
she endorsed suicide attacks, and it would be an honor for her son to do it, if
she had one. She and her daughter (she has no son) live in
Paris.
(OCR, 4/15/02, News 4) .... Arafat said that Palestinians are against all forms
of terrorism. Then he said that terror doesn't serve their interests, not that
it is morally wrong. A few days prior, Arafat said he would outlaw suicide
bombings, but that was omitted from his speech. (OCR, 9/10/02, News 13)
..... An IMF official said Arafat
diverted $900 million in public funds to a special bank account he
controlled. Palestine legislator Hanan Ashrawi said she and others have been
aware of past misuse of funds for some time. (OCR, 9/21/03, News 35)
..... Gunmen in Arab
Beit Jala fired on civilians in Jewish Gilo. Israel sent in troops to stop the
attacks. The troops withdrew after two days when the Palestinians promised to
stop firing on Jala. An American official said, "This shows that Arafat can
stop the shooting." (USN&WR, 9/10/01, 19)
Defense
Secretary Rumsfeld said "I have no reason to believe anything a Taliban
representative would say." First they said they do not know where Bin Laden
is. Then they said the Taliban have been been constantly guarding and protecting
Bin Laden for more than two years. (LAT, 10/1/01, A1)
"Israeli
authorities contend that Bin Laden has not made greater inroads in their nation
and the Palestinian territories because of the tight control the Jewish state
maintains over its borders and the ability of Israeli-paid agents to penetrate
and spy on Palestinian groups." (LAT, 10/3/01, A6)
A survey found 46% of
Palestinians and 41% of Israelis believe there will be no peace in the
foreseeable future, 59% of Palestinians and 46% of Israelis expect the conflict
to continue for 5 to 10 year. Hatred has soared among Palestinians, with wide
support for suicide bombings and other armed attacks on Israelis. "Saleh,
69, once served as agriculture minister in the government Palestinian Authority
President Yasser Arafat, but he quit to protest rampant corruption. ..... He is
one of a daring handful of prominent Palestinians who speak out in favor of
nonviolent resistance." (LAT, 8/22/01, A6) ..... A Palestinian poll of 1179
randomly selected adult Palestinians during May 2002 shows 51% support
eliminating Israel and 43% wanted to push Israel out of Palestinian areas.
During December 2001, the numbers were 43% and 49%, respectively. (OCR, 6/12/02,
News 33)
JERUSALEM (AP, 4/11/06) - Israel on Tuesday stood by its new policy of firing
artillery shells at Palestinian rocket squads operating from populated areas
in Gaza.
The Israeli military intensified its offensive against Palestinian rocket fire
after the Hamas militant group took charge of the Palestinian Authority two
weeks ago.
In a major policy shift, it has begun allowing guns to fire close enough to
hit populated areas.
"As long as it's not quiet here (in Israel), it won't be quiet there (in
Gaza)," Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz said Tuesday.
Deputy Defense Minister Zeev Boim said
the military operations would continue as long as Palestinian militants
continue to launch rockets at Israel. The
military's task is to defend the security of the citizens of Israel,"
Boim said. "If the Hamas government will not control these terrorists
from firing Qassam (rockets) against Israeli civilians in cities and
communities, we will continue to push these citizens out of the range of these
rockets."
Since the beginning of the month, Israel has retaliated against the estimated
32 rockets that landed in Israeli territory with 16 air strikes and more than
1,000 artillery rounds, the military said. Seventeen Palestinians, including
13 militants, have died in the offensive since Friday. There have been no
Israeli casualties from the rocket fire.
Palestinian militants have threatened revenge for the Israeli military
crackdown, but the Hamas government is quietly urging them to refrain from
launching rockets at Israel without permission, officials from both sides have
confirmed.
While Hamas says it still supports armed resistance against
Israel, a halt in
violence would enable it to focus on other brewing crises.
Hamas won Palestinian legislative elections in January on a platform of ending
government corruption and improving public services. But since being sworn
into office, the government has found itself facing tough Western aid cutoffs,
Palestinian infighting and now, growing violence with Israel.
An Israeli
military report expects the conflict to continue for another 5 years. An
influential Israeli adviser has said the Palestinians "will never stop
shooting until they drive us into the sea." (OCR, 8/20/01, Local 6) .....
"The
Palestinians were attacking Jews even when they [Palestinians] controlled the
land now under dispute." (LAT, 8/26/01, M4 Letter) ..... "The 'right
of return,' meanwhile, is a rallying cry for Arabs, particularly hard-line
opponents of Israel. Many Arab states,
in hope of keeping anti-Israeli fervor alive, deny
Palestinians property, citizenship and other rights that might make their
lives as refugees easier." (OCR, 4/16/04, News 28) ..... "Israel is
better, more moral in conduct of its affairs, than any Arab nation you can name.
... Arab nations oppress their own
people and seek the destruction of Israel. They encourage, finance and
celebrate the most horrible acts of terrorism directed against innocent Jewish
citizens. (OCR, 11/1/04, Local 6)
Al
Jazeera, started
11/96, is a 24-hour
satellite uncensored television station from Qatar. It is "a
nightmare for Arab governments accustomed to determining what kind of
information their masses receive." Protests have been received from Jordan,
Kuwait, Arafat, Libya, Morocco, and others. Algeria has cut off power to prevent
receiving its broadcasts. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia will not permit the reporters
on their soil. Israel is concerned that the broadcasts incite Palestinians to
riot, yet "continues to allow its correspondents to operate freely within
its borders." Faisal al Kasim, an Arab current affairs show host on the station said, "For fifty
years, the media in the Arab world have been feeding people nothing but lies." (LAT, 5/7/01, A1)
"The
governments of the Arab nations
are among the most repressive in the world. In most of the countries, there is
no free press. There is no freedom of association. Dissent is crushed. Torture
is common. Opposition parties are weak or ineffective. ..... The lack of a
democratic outlet in Arab countries fosters a breeding ground for Islamic
extremists." (LAT, 10/8/01, A4 R)
The writer of this
article was talking to a Palestinian friend in 1994 in Jerusalem. The
Palestinian confided, "We have many caches of weapons buried there and all
over Israel. Arafat will make the 'peace' with the Israelis and when the time is
right and when we get more of the land, we'll take the guns out and take
the rest of the land." (O. C. Register, 4/1/01, Commentary 4)
Faisel
Husseini, the Palestinian leader who headed the Orient House, compared the 1993
Oslo peace accords with the Trojan horse, an attempt to subvert and ultimately
destroy Israel through territorial concessions. The Oslo agreement is a phased
goal, while ambushing and cheating the Israelis. The ultimate goal is the
liberation of all Palestine, even if this means conflict for another 1000 years.
(LAT, 8/20/01, B11) ..... In 1949, one year after Israel was established, Arafat
published the Voice of Palestine, in which he vowed to fight "the Zionist
entity" and the "agent of imperialism" in the Middle East.
(LAT, 2/10/02, A5)
Most Arabs most times believe "that
the Jewish state must be destroyed, with its inhabitants either subjugated,
exiled or killed." Syria portrays the current Palestinian violence as the
"countdown for the destruction of Israel." Lebanon claims that the
present time offers "an exceptional historic opportunity to finish off the
entire cancerous Zionist project." A Palestinian magazine children's poem
addresses Israelis: "You can choose the sea like cowards, or choose us, and
we will rip you to shreds." Zionist leader Zev Jabotinsky in 1923
explained, "So long as Arabs have a glimmer of hope to rid themselves of
our presence, they will not give it up for all sweet words and far-reaching
promises in the world." (LAT, 8/31/01, B15) ..... Author Hillel Halkin
is searching for the descendants of the 10
lost Jewish tribes, driven from ancient Palestine in 8BC by the
Assyrians. There may be more than 35 million descendants world wide, which could
help offset the sharply increasing Palestinian population. (Newsweek, 10/21/02,
11)
A
Palestinian militant said, "These weapons (mortars) have existed here for a
long time and now is the time to use them." There have been 56 mortar
attacks in the last two months. By the 1993 Oslo agreement, which gave the
Palestinians control of some of the land, Arafat's police can have 15,000 guns
and a few armored personnel carriers. Most other weaponry is illegal. The
Palestinians are now using mortars with a range of 2.5 miles. Israel believes
the Palestinians have been stockpiling antiaircraft guns, antitank missiles, and
other far more deadly equipment. These items have been smuggled into, or
manufactured in Gaza. (LAT, 4/10/01, A9)
The Israeli
navy intercepted a fishing boat loaded with long range weaponry destined for
Palestinian fighters in Gaza. The captured weapons included Katyusha
ground-to-ground rockets, antiaircraft missiles, mines, and antitank grenades.
(LAT, 5/8/01, A3)
Israel intercepted a ship in the Red Sea,
allegedly from Iran, carrying 50 tons of advanced weaponry destined for the Palestinian Authority.
The Captain and several crew members were officers in the Palestinian navy. The
ship was owned by the Palestinian Authority. The Palestinian Authority denied
any involvement. The weapons included 12-mile range Katyusha rockets, 120-mm
mortars, antiaircraft missiles, mines, armor-piercing Sagger antitank missiles,
sniper rifles, and C4 explosives. Most of the weapons are forbidden to the
Palestinians under existing agreements. (LAT, 1/7/02, A3 & 1/5/02, A7) .....
The Bush administration accused Arafat of lying about his government's role in
the arms smuggling operation and lying about arresting three Palestinians
involved. (LAT, 1/25/02, A3) ..... "Yasser Arafat
lied to the president about a ... shipment of weapons to terrorists that
Yasser Arafat said he had nothing to do with, had no knowledge of, when it was
proven that he was involved in it," Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer said last
year. (Dan Williams, Reuters, 10/18/04) ..... US and Israeli intelligence concluded Arafat
has had an agreement with Iran for
shipments of heavy weapons and millions of dollars to Palestinian groups that
are waging guerrilla war against Israel. The partnership was arranged at a
clandestine meeting in May in Moscow. (OCR, 3/24/02, News 27)
"Under the 1993 Oslo peace accords,
Palestinian security forces were allowed to have thousands of machine guns,
assault rifles, and pistols, much of the weaponry supplied by Israel.
In addition, large caches have been smuggled into Palestinian territory from
Egypt, Jordan and Israel or manufactured domestically. Recently, militants
have added mortars to their arsenal, and judging from intercepted shipments, may
have acquired surface-to-air missiles and artillery." Palestinians
"have been armed and trained since the Palestinian Authority gained control
of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1994 and 1995, and are now organized into
paramilitary units determined to eject the
Israelis." (LAT, 5/24/01,
A1) ..... The Israeli army seized eight missiles and a launcher in
the West Bank. The missiles have a range of eight miles and could hit cities in
the heart of Israel. The missiles were found in a truck carrying vegetables from
Nablus to Jenin, both towns very active in the fight against Israel. This is the
first time these missiles have been found in the West Bank, but Hamas has fired
similar missiles in the Gaza Strip. (LAT, 2/7/02, A3) ..... Palestinians fired
two home-made Kassam-II rockets from the Gaza Strip into Israel. They carry up
to 22 pounds of explosives, and have no guidance systems, but are precise enough
to be used against a metropolitan target. (OCR, 2/11/02, News 11)
RAMALLAH, West Bank (1/31/06, AP) - Hamas is searching for new sources of funding. International donors that support the Palestinian government said millions of dollars of aid could be in jeopardy if Hamas does not change its violent ways. Hamas, which has killed hundreds of Israelis in suicide attacks, is poised to lead the next Palestinian government after winning legislative elections. Western donors, led by the United States and EU, funnel some
$900 million to the Palestinians each
year, most of it designated for reconstruction projects in the impoverished Gaza Strip and West Bank. The United States and European Union list Hamas as a terrorist group, making it difficult, if not illegal, for them to give money to a government led by Hamas. Israel also said it would stop the
monthly transfer of $55 million in taxes and customs it collects from Palestinian workers and merchants to the Palestinian Authority if a Hamas government is installed. Hamas officials said the group already is in touch with potential donors in Arab and Muslim nations. Analysts say that although most wealthy Gulf nations will not stand by and watch the Palestinians starve, the
Arab and Muslim world is unlikely to provide the kind of cash Western nations have
given. Government officials in the oil-rich countries of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar, the most likely donors, are staying clear of the subject for now, refusing to discuss the issue despite repeated contacts from the AP. The
Gulf governments have pledged tens of millions of dollars to the Palestinians in the past but sent only a tiny fraction of that money.
..... Arafat opened the space for Hamas. Arafat created one of the most
ill-disciplined, corrupt, and
ineffective organizations ever to be taken seriously on the world stage.
(Newsweek, 2/6/06, 32)
Palestinian aid in jeopardy
[after Hamas election victory]: At least half of the PA's $3
billion budget is dependent on funds from donors. The European Union is the largest donor to Palestinian projects. Last year it gave $612 million in aid, but halted direct payments to the Palestinian Authority (PA) due to concerns over the high level of government salaries.
The United States gave the PA $400 million last year and has budgeted $234 million in assistance this year. Since 1993, the US has given the Palestinians more than $1.5 billion.
Israel has suggested it would suspend customs revenue transfers to the PA, which total $40 million to $50 million per month and are crucial toward paying the salaries of 135,000 Palestinian employees.
Hamas has rejected threats of a funding cutoff as blackmail and has said it could seek money from alternative sources, within the Arab world and beyond.
Source: Reuters, 1/31/06

The birth of a Hamas terrorist statelet in the West Bank is not just one disaster but many. It will destroy the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, it will threaten America's regional friends, such as Jordan and Egypt, and it will embolden all of America's enemies in the region—Syria, Iran, the Islamic insurgents in Iraq, al Qaeda, and Hezbollah. Hamastan, as they call it, will become a training ground for terrorism—a sort of Afghanistan lite. As Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar put it, "We will join the Legislative Council with our weapons in our hands." These killers will now be wearing official police and military uniforms. Who in Palestine will dare argue for a peaceful negotiation with Israel? Hamas, which claims the blood of almost 600 innocent Israelis on its hands, could not have been more explicit than it was in a tv advertisement that aired January 17: "We do not recognize the Israeli enemy, nor his right to be our neighbor, nor to stay [on the land], nor his ownership of any inch of land." Hamas doesn't even pretend to want peace with Israel. Its goals are, quite simply, the
annihilation of the Jewish state in favor of an Islamic state throughout the Holy
Land—an Islamic regime whose source of authority and laws is Islamic law as codified in the sharia. As Zahar put it, "In the Islamist Palestinian State, every citizen will be required to act in accordance with the codes of Islamic religious law."
Hamas covenant: "The time [of Muslim unity] will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews and kill them; until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry, 'O, Muslims, there is a Jew behind me, come on and kill him.'" In Article 6, the covenant states Hamas's objective clearly: "To raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine . . . Israel will just continue until Islam will eliminate it." The conflict is defined in religious terms: "The Land of Palestine from the river to the sea is considered an Islamic waqf [endowment], and no Muslim has the right to cede any part of it."A two-state solution? "Never!" How will Hamas accomplish the obliteration of Israel? Article 13 states: "There is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by jihad; initiatives, proposals, and international conferences are but a waste of time." A former Hamas leader, Abdel Aziz Rantisi, spelled it out: "We will not leave one Jew in Palestine." The current Hamas leader, Khaled Mashaal, reiterated the threat at a post-election press conference in Damascus. Hamas will not disarm; it will not even recognize Israel's 1967 borders—never mind the secure and recognized boundaries for Israel called for by U.N. resolutions. A two-state solution? "Never!" vowed Zahar, when asked if Hamas would recognize Israel.Hamas is not just a mortal threat to Israel and all who live in the state. It inhabits an irrational world of paranoid fantasy. Articles 22 and 32 of the covenant, for instance, assert that "the Jews" control the world media, such as news agencies, the press, publication houses, broadcasting, and the like and have used this power and their wealth to stir revolutions—including the French and the Communist revolutions, wwi, and wwii. "They used their money to establish clandestine organizations such as the Free Masons, Rotary Clubs, Lions Clubs, and the like—all secret organizations . . . that act for the interest of Zionism and under its direction . . . laid out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion." The Protocols! Everyone knows they were a clumsy Bolshevik fraud, but to Hamas they are sacred writ. How can Israelis or anyone else negotiate with such fantasists? And only fantasists can hope that Hamas will soon turn its back on terrorism. Extremist parties of this nature don't become more moderate; they become more extreme—see the record of the Baath Party in Syria under Hafez Assad and in Iraq under Saddam Hussein, as well as Muslims under the Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran—not to mention how Arafat's idea of responsibility was starting the second intifada or the wretched behavior of Hezbollah in Lebanon.Hamas may try to play the old word game and put a sheep's clothing on the wolf, as Arafat did. Israeli intelligence has concluded that, in fact, Hamas will do just that, biding its time before it finally strikes. It ought to be clear to everyone that any deal with Hamas will have as much meaning as a deal with Osama bin Laden. Is it really so hard to understand that a group that calls for genocide, extols terrorism, and demands a Taliban-style regime is not about to become moderate?
Contempt for Christianity. Hamas hates Christians as much as it does Jews. Take Bethlehem. It is no longer a Christian city. Muslims now vastly outnumber the departing Christians who are being effectively forced out at a rate where fairly soon the only Christians in Bethlehem will be holiday tourists. Just last year, Hamas won the citywide election, and a city councilor quickly advocated a special tax on non-Muslim residents, as ordained by the Koran for dhimmis, second-class Jews and Christians. The contempt for Christianity was manifest several years earlier when the newly elected radical Muslim mayor of Nazareth gave permission to build a mosque in the parking lot of the Basilica of the Annunciation, which would have overwhelmed the Basilica and made it virtually impossible for Christians to visit. Fortunately, the plan was blocked by the Israelis.In 2002. Washington has already helped create another flashpoint, by imposing on Israel the porous border-control agreement between Gaza and Egypt in Raffah in the belief that the Palestinian Authority, corrupt and inefficient as it was, would do what it promised. Now this border will be taken over by Hamas, which will try to bring in terrorists and weapons, especially rockets with greater range and accuracy. If rockets are deployed to fire on Israeli cities, Israel will have to intervene to protect its citizens.The Palestinian election reminds us all that the Islamists remain the only organized political force in the Arab world. They are the most effective at capitalizing on popular discontent. We have seen their resurgence in Iraq. If really free elections were held in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood would win; in Algeria, in Saudi Arabia, the same thing would happen—and not because of Israel. Jordan, with its population made up of 70 percent Palestinians, is now at risk, and it is a country whose stability is vital to America's interests.Sadly, the beneficiary of this turn of events is another heinous power in the region, Iran. For 25 years, Tehran has been steadily giving more and more money to terrorist organizations. It has been the principal sponsor of Hezbollah and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, as well as Hamas, and they all work together. For example, Hamas has been transferring rockets and other materiel to these terrorist organizations so they can launch rocket attacks from Gaza against Israel. A few weeks ago, in Damascus, the extremist Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said publicly to Mashaal, the Hamas leader, that the party's victory in Palestine has become a matter of life and death for the Islamic world. The
flow of funds from the United States and Europe should cease; it has long been unconscionable that so many millions of dollars have been spent to support terror and hate: Palestinian schools and media have never ceased inculcating hatred, sowing the poison from generation to
generation. (USN&WR, 2/13/06, 64)
MOSCOW (AP, 3/3/06) - Hamas' political leader on Friday bluntly
rejected any discussion of the militant group's refusal to recognize Israel,
dealing a setback to Moscow's effort to persuade it to soften its stance. The
issue of recognition (of Israel) is a decided
issue," said Hamas' exiled political leader Khaled Mashaal upon
arrival in Moscow for talks with Russian officials. "We
don't intend to recognize Israel."
The newly designated Hamas prime minister, Ismail
Haniyeh was speaking from Shati refugee camp in Gaza, where he lives with
his wife and 12 children. Do you recognize
Israel's right to exist?
The answer is, let Israel say they will recognize a Palestinian state
along the 1967 borders, release the prisoners and recognize the rights of the
refugees to return to Israel. Hamas will
have a position if this occurs.
(Newsweek, 3/6/06, 30) [Clear answer and commitment?]
A video message on the Hamas website proclaims: "We are a
nation that drinks blood, and we know that there is no blood better than the blood
of the Jews." But the lust to kill Jews is only part of it. Hamas,
like Osama bin Laden and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has ambitions
that threaten us all. Khaled Mashal, Hamas's top leader, spelled them out:
"The nation of Islam will sit at
the throne of the world ... Muhammad is gaining victory in Palestine
[and] in Iraq. ... The Arab and Islamic nation is rising and awakening. ... Tomorrow
we will lead the world." Not to be outdone is the Hamas leader in
Gaza, Mahmoud al-Zahar: "We are part of the great world plan whose name is
the world Islamic movement." According to the Jerusalem Post, the Hamas
victory will "lift the morale of the Arab and Islamic world and affect the
battle for Afghanistan and Iraq." Just a few days before the Palestinian
election, Ahmadinejad met Mashal and Hamas's other leader-in-exile, Musa Abu
Marzuk, in Damascus, along with the leaders of nine other Syria-based terrorist
groups. The Palestinian conflict, they
concluded, will become a "focal point of the final war" between Islam
and the West. Hezbollah has already moved its operational headquarters
from Beirut to Gaza; al Qaeda elements are already there. These are omens
of an evil confluence, the formation of a Tehran-Damascus-Hezbollah-Gaza axis in
which Iran will fund and arm a new front of terrorism with its head in Iran, its
body in Iraq and Lebanon, and its feet in Gaza and the West Bank. Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei, Iran's leader, warned that
financial aid to the Palestinians would be conditional on continued terror and
resistance against Israel. (USN&WR, 3/20/06, 72)

Muslims
and Jews
"The
original Jewish community in Hebron was destroyed in 1929, when Arabs rose up
against Jewish immigration to Palestine, killing 69 people and forcing the rest
to flee." (L. A. Times, 4/2/01, A6) ..... After living in Hebron for
centuries, Jews were driven out during Arab riots in 1929. Dozens were massacred.
When Israel captured the West Bank in the 1967 Middle East war, settlers began moving back into what had been Hebron's Jewish quarter. Kiryat Arba, one of the West Bank's largest settlements, was established in 1972, and is home to thousands of Israelis today.
Nearly all the (about 450) Jews in Hebron and many living in the nearby settlement of Kiryat Arba walk to the Tomb of the Patriarchs every Friday evening, and the route is heavily guarded by Israeli security forces. The site is the burial place of the biblical Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, who are revered by both faiths.
(AP-NY-11-15-02 1601EST) ..... Before 1948, Arab riots forced Jews from Yemen to
flee from Silwan, a community area in east Jerusalem. Some Jews now want to
re-establish their Silwan community. The Arabs call it a "land
grab." (OCR, 4/1/04, News 21)
Israeli public relations now will stress that the Jews were
there long before the Palestinians. They recognize that Palestinians now living
in Israel are entitled to rights, but "the whole land of Israel is the
birthright of the Jewish people." (LAT, 8/8/01, A1)
No practising Muslim looks at you as a Jew -- if he knows you
are a Jew -- looks at you in any way other than you are the enemy. He can give
you any line, he can tell you, he can lie…Under the practise of Islam, Taqiya
is lying under Islam in order to advance the cause of Islam. And the way
you advance the cause of Islam is lying to the Jews under Dawa, and I know this
is another word that you have never heard. Dawa is literally "the
call" -- when Muslims must befriend the Jews in order to win them over.
http://www.ajn.com.au/news/news.asp?pgID=3403
http://www.answering-islam.org/Index/T/taqiya.html more on
taqiya
Lebanese troops arrested about 250 Christians because of their
demands that Syria pull its 25,000 soldiers out of Lebanon. (LAT, 8/9/01, A4)
..... A Lebanese journalist faces death for meeting with Israeli
officials. (OCR, 8/24/01, News 30) ..... Israel fears that Syrian-backed
Hezbollah is heavily armed and preparing direct attacks on Israel. However, the
Israeli response will not be to Lebanon, but will be to Syria.
(USN&WR, 3/18/02, 4)
"The
United Nations admitted last month that it misled Israel about the existence of
a videotape filmed 18 hours after the Oct. 7 abduction [of 3 Israeli soldiers].
It showed U.N. peacekeepers handing over, at gunpoint, two vehicles probably
used in the abduction." (LAT, 8/9/01, A6) ..... A U.N. report found no
evidence of a massacre in Jenin refugee camp (April 2002), refuting Arab
lies that it had occurred. (OCR, 8/3/02, News 2)
"A
Palestinian blew himself up in a crowded downtown Jerusalem pizzeria at
lunchtime Thursday, killing 15 other people, including children and one
[pregnant] American." This followed a June 1 suicide bombing outside a Tel
Aviv disco killing 22 young people. (LAT, 8/10/01, A1) ........ A
28-year old Palestinian blew himself up in a cafe in northern Israel, injuring
about 20. (LAT, 8/13/01) ..... During the five months of the Palestinian
uprising when Barak was prime minister, Israelis were killed by Palestinians at
a rate of 13 per month. This increased to 21 per month during Sharon's year in
office. (OCR, 3/7/02, News 14)
In
1981, Israeli warplanes destroyed the Osirak (Iraq) nuclear
reactor, capable of
producing nuclear weapons. The raid was roundly condemned in Europe and
the United States. Ten years later (1991), Iraq invaded Kuwait, and a
U.S.-backed coalition responded. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney gave to Israel
a satellite photo of the destroyed nuclear plant, with the message, "With
thanks and appreciation for the outstanding job you did on the Iraqi nuclear
program ..... which made our job much easier in Desert Storm." (LAT,
8/12/01, M2) ..... http://www.alisrael.com/tamuz/
..... Ilan Ramon, a 48-year-old Israeli air force colonel, died
with 6 other astronauts on the Columbia space shuttle 2/1/03. Ramon was one of
the first Israeli pilots for F-16 fighters, fought in 1973 and 1982 wars, and
was one of the pilots that destroyed an unfinished nuclear
reactor in Iraq in 1981. (OCR, 2/11/03, News 18)
"Under the Israeli government, all religious groups have
always had full access to their special sites and, in most cases, full control
of them." (San Diego Union-Tribune, 9/5/01, B9 Letter) [The Jews were
denied access to their most important religious site, the wailing wall, when the
Arabs controlled it.]
In 1901, a fund was created to buy
land for Zionists. During the past 100 years, the fund has developed 250,000
acres and planted more than 200 million trees. (LAT, 9/7/01, A3)
After the 9/11/01 murder of 5000? civilian Americans, the
Israeli Defense Minister said, "I hope the world now understands that its
No. 1 enemy is Islamic terror." Predictably, most Arab leaders, even those
advocating 'death to Americans', expressed their regrets about the killing of so
many innocent people. However, many of their people were dancing with joy and
having celebration parties. Elliot Cohen, professor of strategic studies, said
"we have to stop thinking about this as cops and robbers and start thinking
of it as war. .... It means you may well do thing that may well involve
collateral damage and hurting civilians." Loren Thompson, a defense
analyst, said "retaliation might include bombing in major cities and
attacks on material assets of countries considered friendly to terrorists. .....
The only way to prevent this in the future is to do what the terrorists did to
demonstrate the consequences. We need a huge show of force that involves huge
loss of material assets and lots of casualties." Larry Johnson, a former
counter-terrorist official, said "Bin Laden's awakened people to the need
to use weapons not used before - including nuclear weapons - on Afghanistan. You
don't launch a few missiles and make a few craters and expect the problem to go
away." (LAT, 9/12/01, A15) ..... A poll in the U.S. "finds that
66 percent of Americans think that a government should stop terrorists before
they act, just as Israel has done in Palestine." (USN&WR, 9/10/01, 10)
Arafat angrily rejected any suggestion that the Palestinians
rejoiced over the terrorist attacks on the U.S. He said that "it was less
than 10 children in East Jerusalem, and we punished them." "It was
unclear how this assertion could be squared with photographs of the
crowds." (OCR, 9/13/01, News 22) ..... Palestinian groups celebrated in the
streets the attack on the U.S. "Palestinian policemen and gunmen threatened
photographers and other journalists who attempted to cover the demonstrations,
and Arafat quickly banned further displays." (LAT, 9/14/01, A36) .....
"Palestinian security agents are said to have detained cameramen and
confiscated their tapes after they filmed Palestinians celebrating the Sept. 11
attacks on the United States. In subsequent days, some areas of the Gaza Strip
were closed to journalists by Palestinian authorities in an apparent effort to
prevent the coverage of such demonstrations." (OCR, 5/4/02, News 7)
Extermination
of Jews and Subjugation of Christians-Inevitable Goal of History
(Excerpt from Palestinian
Authority TV Sermon)
The final stage of history will be the subjugation of all Christian countries
under Islam and the extermination of every single Jew - this according to the PA
religious leader during Friday’s Sermon. The Jews are so evil, Ibrahim
Mudayris teaches, that they cannot be subjugated like the Christian countries,
and therefore the only solution awaiting them is death – literally the
extermination of every Jew. In his words: “The day will come and we shall rule
America, Britain, we shall rule the entire world, except the Jews.” In
the sermon Ibrahim Mudayris reiterated many of the often-repeated PA
justifications for the anticipated genocide, including the following hate
messages: God has predetermined that the Jewish problem will be
solved with the extermination of the
Jews. God has predetermined that the Christian -Islam interactions will
end with today's Christian countries
under Islam. Israel has no right to exist and will be destroyed. http://www.pmw.org.il/Latest%20bulletins%20new.htm#May13
5/16/05
Jews
in Arab Countries
1948
Now
Algeria
140,000
0
Egypt
75,000
100
Iraq
135,000
100
Lebanon
5,000
100
Libya
38,000
0
Morocco
265,000 5,700
Syria
30,000
100
Tunisia
105,000 1,500
Yemen
55,000
200
http://www.factsandlogic.org/pdf/ad_106.pdf (USN&WR,
3/19/07, 63)

The Middle
East Mindset
4/13/11, http://www.hudson-ny.org/2011/middle-east-mindset
It is now clear why Mahmoud Abbas and his
Palestinian Authority have refused negotiations with Israel for more than a
year, even after Israel agreed to freeze Jewish construction in Judea, Samaria
and Jerusalem: they have been busy working behind the scenes with South American
leaders to obtain a declaration of
statehood for "Palestine." Abbas has reason to gloat. President
Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner of Argentina recently recognized "Palestine
as a free and independent state based on its pre-1967 borders," and other
South American countries have followed her lead.
Having failed to obtain an independence
declaration at the U.N. Security Council, the PA is now preparing to bypass the
Security Council and ask the General Assembly to invoke the precedent of the
U.N. General Assembly's "Uniting for Peace" Resolution 377 (passed in
1950), which could allow that body to recommend collective action "if the
Security Council, because of lack of unanimity of the permanent members, fails
to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international
peace and security". Such action would not only preempt the authority of
the Security Council, but would pressure Israel into accepting Palestinian
statehood without the Palestinians being required to honor their international
commitments or to make any compromises or concessions.
Forgotten are UN Security Council Resolutions
242 and 338, both passed in the wake of the Six-Day War (1967) and the Yom
Kippur War (1973). These Resolutions acknowledged Israel's need for secure and
recognized boundaries prior to any Israeli withdrawals. They now appear,
however, to be irrelevant, raising the question: Why should Israel honor its
international commitments with the Palestinians (such as those enshrined in the
Oslo Accords) if international commitments made with Israel by the Palestinians
are not honored as well?
The fact that the Montevideo Convention on the
Rights and Duties of States requires a "state" to have a permanent
population, a defined territory over which it has control, a stable government,
and the capacity to enter into relations with other states - and that
"Palestine" does not qualify for statehood under any of these
conditions is apparently unimportant to these countries in the General Assembly.
While most of the world ignored a similar
declaration by the Palestinian National Council in Algeria in 1988, these new
events are disturbing not simply because they contradict both the letter and
spirit of the Oslo Accords and bypass existing UN Security Council Resolutions
designed to do justice to both Israelis and Palestinians, but because they
reinforce the myth that the creation of
a Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza will satisfy the Palestinians
and resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. There is no historical, political
and religious basis to believe this will be the case.
The Arabs
have initiated six wars to exterminate Israel, and have lost all of them.
So intense is the fear of Arab leaders that their own people will target them as
the true source of their misery (as appears to be happening today throughout the
Arab world); so intense is their hatred of Israel incited as it is by Al-Jazeera,
al-Manar and countless other outlets; so humiliating is Israel's presence in
their midst, that any compromise on core issues --such as settlements, borders,
Jerusalem, a Palestinian right of return, and especially recognizing Israel as a
Jewish state -- would be seen by the Arab street as a betrayal of unbearable
magnitude. Arab and Muslim leaders understand that any compromise on these core
issues would threaten their power and their lives.
Sixty-three years after Israel's establishment,
Arabs who fled or left mandatory Palestine in 1948, and their descendants, who
now number over five million, continue to live in the refugee camps of Gaza, the
West Bank, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. There, they are enveloped with hatred for
Israel, while being used by their Arab brethren, and given "permanent
refugee status" by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency [UNRWA],
where they are promised that one day they will return to their homes in
"Palestine" [Israel]. At the entrance to the UNRWA-funded Aida Refugee
Camp, established in Bethlehem in 1950, and where an estimated 3,000
Palestinians live, there is a gigantic key on which is written in English and
Arabic: "Not for Sale." What is not for sale is all the land from the
Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea -- that is, all of Israel -- which, they
unapologetically state in their "moderate" Palestinian Charter, must
never be abandoned in any peace agreement. On almost every house one can see
graffiti showing an undivided Palestine.
As no Israeli government could allow an influx
of millions of hostile Palestinians into its country, Israel's refusal to allow
a complete "right of return" has become a useful pretext for
continuing the conflict. The longer Israel can be used as a scapegoat, the
better it serves Arab interests by re-directing their citizens' rage away from
their own oppressive, corrupt and crushing governance. For this reason, at Taba
(2001) and at Annapolis (2007), the Palestinian leadership, supported by the
Arab and Muslim world, and rejected Palestinian statehood on more than 95% of
the West Bank and Gaza rather than recognize Israel as a Jewish state and forego
its "right of return." Even the Fatah Revolutionary Council, the
ruling PLO Authority in the West Bank, has declared: "No to Israel as a
Jewish state, no to interim borders, no to land swaps;" and Palestinian
Prime Minister Salam Fayyad refused to sign a meeting summary with the Israelis
that accepted the concept of two-states-for-two-peoples.
Consequently, from the Arab
perspective, there is no basis for compromise and nothing to negotiate with
Israel except its demise. Recognizing Israel as a Jewish state would be
the ultimate humiliation for the Arab world: any compromise by any Arab or
Muslim leader on that subject would likely prove fatal, as it did with Egyptian
President Anwar Sadat.
This uncompromising mindset also pervaded the
Oslo "Peace Process." Despite eight years of direct negotiations with
the Israelis, Arafat could not bring himself to make peace with Israel. As
Richard Landes writes in "Augean Stables", Arafat acted with enormous
reluctance, pocketing all he could, using the ceiling of Israel's last
concession as the floor for the next; offering no concessions in return, and
assuring the Arab street that signing the Oslo Agreement was merely a Trojan
Horse, through which he planned to continue his 1974 Phased Plan for the
dismantling and ultimate destruction of the Jewish state. For Arafat, the
concessions were never real. In response to virtually universal condemnation
from the Arab/Muslim world, he justified making the Agreements by stating:
"I am hammering the first nail into
the Zionist coffin." He equated the Accords with Mohammed's Treaty
of Hudabiya with the Koreish tribe, which Mohammed maintained for only two years
instead of the promised ten -- until his forces grew strong enough to crush the
Koreish. Speaking in Johannesburg in 1993, after signing the Accords, Arafat
assured his audience that Jerusalem, in the end, would be exclusively Muslim;
that the only permanent state in present-day Israel would be the Arab state of
Palestine, and that the "peace
process" would end in the Palestinian conquest of Israel -- no
surprise given that Fatah's constitution maintains to this day that "the
struggle will not end until the elimination of the Zionist entity and the
liberation of Palestine."
Similarly, Mahmoud Zahar, co-founder of Hamas,
took pains to explain to Gazans that his commitment to an unofficial ceasefire
with Israel should not be seen as an act of weakness, but as a tactic that would
allow Hamas time to re-arm and re-organize for the coming war.
Intertwined with these overriding feelings of
humiliation, hatred and fear should any compromise be reached on Israel's right
to exist, are the principles of Islamic Shari'a law which provide for the
subordination of women, the subordination of "unbelievers," death for
apostasy, homosexuality, alleged adultery, cartoons ...," and so forth --
principles that flow through this conflict and that are downplayed by Western
leaders as mere rhetoric. Recently, the Palestinian Authority's religious
affairs official praised Palestinians who carry out ribat (religious war)
against Israel; and the coordinator of the National Committee on Summer Camps
told his local media that Palestinian summer camps instill in children the
Palestinian culture "which unites the culture of resistance, the culture of
stones and guns ... and the culture of shahada (martyrdom)."
Professor Robert Wistrich in his book, A
Lethal Obsession: Anti-Semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad leaves no
doubt that the Arab and Muslim rejection of Israel is based in large measure on
Islamic principles that permeate their societies. The treatment
of Jews in Muslim lands throughout the centuries further confirms that this
hostility toward Jews -- and the genocidal rhetoric and suicide bombers
that flow from it -- cannot be separated from an enmity that began with
Mohammed; was later encouraged by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem (infatuated as he
was with the Nazis and their propaganda); and is now aimed at Israel as a Jewish
state.
Whatever points of ideology and tactics may
divide the nominally secular Palestinian Authority f